卫生部门的财政限制:罗马尼亚在欧洲的地位,重点是风湿病

Q4 Medicine
F. Berghea, B. Pharmacy
{"title":"卫生部门的财政限制:罗马尼亚在欧洲的地位,重点是风湿病","authors":"F. Berghea, B. Pharmacy","doi":"10.37897/rjr.2018.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health represents both a personal and social asset different valued by individuals and populations. Personal education, previous experience, sex, income or housing variables contribute to a higher or lower prioritization of health care. Different actors interfere their forces and interests in this area: industry is interested in profit, administration is interested in a healthier and productive population, politicians are interested in accomplishing their agenda, patients want to pay less and receive more benefits etc. As European Union is still very inhomogeneous in terms of wealth, education or previous experience with health sector is clear that a large pool of differences could observed among EU28 countries. Objectives. In this paper we are analyzing EU official statistical data to understand these differences and find practical conclusions for what Romanian health system intend to be. Methods. Analyses of EU statistics public available in Eurostat directory. Results. We analyzed how developed and what are the outcomes of EU health sector with a focus on Romania and rheumatology field. Discussions and conclusions. There is no a clear link between different components of health sector and the way these are financed and the outcome.","PeriodicalId":33518,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana de Reumatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial constrains in the health sector: Romanian place in European perspective with a focus on rheumatic disease\",\"authors\":\"F. Berghea, B. Pharmacy\",\"doi\":\"10.37897/rjr.2018.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Health represents both a personal and social asset different valued by individuals and populations. Personal education, previous experience, sex, income or housing variables contribute to a higher or lower prioritization of health care. Different actors interfere their forces and interests in this area: industry is interested in profit, administration is interested in a healthier and productive population, politicians are interested in accomplishing their agenda, patients want to pay less and receive more benefits etc. As European Union is still very inhomogeneous in terms of wealth, education or previous experience with health sector is clear that a large pool of differences could observed among EU28 countries. Objectives. In this paper we are analyzing EU official statistical data to understand these differences and find practical conclusions for what Romanian health system intend to be. Methods. Analyses of EU statistics public available in Eurostat directory. Results. We analyzed how developed and what are the outcomes of EU health sector with a focus on Romania and rheumatology field. Discussions and conclusions. There is no a clear link between different components of health sector and the way these are financed and the outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Romana de Reumatologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Romana de Reumatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjr.2018.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana de Reumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjr.2018.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康既是一种个人资产,也是一种社会资产,受到个人和人群的不同重视。个人教育、以前的经验、性别、收入或住房等可变因素对保健的优先次序或高或低有影响。不同的参与者在这一领域干涉他们的力量和利益:工业对利润感兴趣,管理对更健康和更有生产力的人口感兴趣,政治家对完成他们的议程感兴趣,患者想要支付更少的钱而获得更多的好处等等。由于欧洲联盟在财富、教育或以前在卫生部门的经验方面仍然非常不均匀,很明显,在欧盟28个国家之间可以观察到很大的差异。目标。在本文中,我们正在分析欧盟官方统计数据,以了解这些差异,并为罗马尼亚卫生系统的意图找到实际的结论。方法。分析欧盟统计公开可在欧盟统计局目录。结果。我们以罗马尼亚和风湿病学领域为重点,分析了欧盟卫生部门的发展情况和成果。讨论和结论。卫生部门的不同组成部分与这些组成部分的筹资方式和结果之间没有明确的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial constrains in the health sector: Romanian place in European perspective with a focus on rheumatic disease
Health represents both a personal and social asset different valued by individuals and populations. Personal education, previous experience, sex, income or housing variables contribute to a higher or lower prioritization of health care. Different actors interfere their forces and interests in this area: industry is interested in profit, administration is interested in a healthier and productive population, politicians are interested in accomplishing their agenda, patients want to pay less and receive more benefits etc. As European Union is still very inhomogeneous in terms of wealth, education or previous experience with health sector is clear that a large pool of differences could observed among EU28 countries. Objectives. In this paper we are analyzing EU official statistical data to understand these differences and find practical conclusions for what Romanian health system intend to be. Methods. Analyses of EU statistics public available in Eurostat directory. Results. We analyzed how developed and what are the outcomes of EU health sector with a focus on Romania and rheumatology field. Discussions and conclusions. There is no a clear link between different components of health sector and the way these are financed and the outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信