阿曼多·塞尔瓦托(Armando Salvatore):《伊斯兰社会学:知识、权力和文明》

Igor Johannsen
{"title":"阿曼多·塞尔瓦托(Armando Salvatore):《伊斯兰社会学:知识、权力和文明》","authors":"Igor Johannsen","doi":"10.17192/META.2017.9.7528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"#09–2017 Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2016; pp. 344; ISBN 978-1-119-10997-6 (paperback) With this book, Armando Salvatore, Professor of Global Religious Studies at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, presents the first volume of a forthcoming trilogy on the sociology of Islam. This introductory volume focuses especially on the role and function of civility in Muslim thought and practice, considering mainly the timespan of the Middle Periods, which are in academic and public discourse often associated with the slow cultural, religious, and material decay of the realm of Islam, up until the postcolonial present. In contrast to resting on the simplified and defective notion of retrogression, Salvatore challenges the reader to dare go beyond those rather naïve and basic (dis) qualification in a quest to examine the unique and ambivalent ways through which civility was crafted and remained intact in the Muslim world. To accomplish this, the book introduces a row of adjustments to key significations that are relevant in the respective academic and public discourse. Crucially, the very notion of civil society – a recurring trope in the analysis of Islamic societies and their presumed deficiency regarding their modernizing potential – is unmasked as a quite distinct feature of an essentially European quest for modernity and in its static and circumscribed quality unfit to present itself as a coherent concept for evaluating the attendant qualifications in non-European societies. Another word and concept that is crucial for understanding Salvatore’s approach is the term “Islamdom,” borrowed from Marshall Hodgson, to clarify the three-dimensional frame of comprehension followed through in his analysis: the religious (Islam), civilizational (Islamdom), and meta-institutional or traditional (Islam/Islamdom nexus and node) aspects of what is commonly referred to by using the disclaimer Islam(ic) (286). By understanding civil society as the specific way of institutionalization of civility in a European context, determined by the theory of the State as it emanated from the Westphalian order and attendant political theory, Salvatore argues for a more open conceptualization of civility to be able to incorporate divergent forms of comprehending and instituting forms of the knowledgepower equation. In acknowledging the challenge that Islam poses to solidified sociological categories, Salvatore reminds us about the strong focus (or obsession) of sociology as a field of knowledge production with the concept of modernity and equates that with “initial paradigmatic limitations of Western sociology”, as it proves unable to escape the comparative mode of sociological research (2). Here, he rephrases an argument he made in the edited volume Islam review 143","PeriodicalId":30565,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Topics Arguments","volume":"9 1","pages":"143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Armando Salvatore: \\\"The Sociology of Islam: Knowledge, Power and Civility\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Igor Johannsen\",\"doi\":\"10.17192/META.2017.9.7528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"#09–2017 Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2016; pp. 344; ISBN 978-1-119-10997-6 (paperback) With this book, Armando Salvatore, Professor of Global Religious Studies at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, presents the first volume of a forthcoming trilogy on the sociology of Islam. This introductory volume focuses especially on the role and function of civility in Muslim thought and practice, considering mainly the timespan of the Middle Periods, which are in academic and public discourse often associated with the slow cultural, religious, and material decay of the realm of Islam, up until the postcolonial present. In contrast to resting on the simplified and defective notion of retrogression, Salvatore challenges the reader to dare go beyond those rather naïve and basic (dis) qualification in a quest to examine the unique and ambivalent ways through which civility was crafted and remained intact in the Muslim world. To accomplish this, the book introduces a row of adjustments to key significations that are relevant in the respective academic and public discourse. Crucially, the very notion of civil society – a recurring trope in the analysis of Islamic societies and their presumed deficiency regarding their modernizing potential – is unmasked as a quite distinct feature of an essentially European quest for modernity and in its static and circumscribed quality unfit to present itself as a coherent concept for evaluating the attendant qualifications in non-European societies. Another word and concept that is crucial for understanding Salvatore’s approach is the term “Islamdom,” borrowed from Marshall Hodgson, to clarify the three-dimensional frame of comprehension followed through in his analysis: the religious (Islam), civilizational (Islamdom), and meta-institutional or traditional (Islam/Islamdom nexus and node) aspects of what is commonly referred to by using the disclaimer Islam(ic) (286). By understanding civil society as the specific way of institutionalization of civility in a European context, determined by the theory of the State as it emanated from the Westphalian order and attendant political theory, Salvatore argues for a more open conceptualization of civility to be able to incorporate divergent forms of comprehending and instituting forms of the knowledgepower equation. In acknowledging the challenge that Islam poses to solidified sociological categories, Salvatore reminds us about the strong focus (or obsession) of sociology as a field of knowledge production with the concept of modernity and equates that with “initial paradigmatic limitations of Western sociology”, as it proves unable to escape the comparative mode of sociological research (2). Here, he rephrases an argument he made in the edited volume Islam review 143\",\"PeriodicalId\":30565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Topics Arguments\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"143-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Topics Arguments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17192/META.2017.9.7528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Topics Arguments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17192/META.2017.9.7528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

# 09-2017霍博肯,新泽西州:Wiley, 2016;页。344;在这本书中,加拿大蒙特利尔麦吉尔大学全球宗教研究教授阿曼多·萨尔瓦托(Armando Salvatore)介绍了即将出版的伊斯兰社会学三部曲的第一卷。这个介绍性的卷特别侧重于角色和功能的文明在穆斯林的思想和实践,主要考虑的时间跨度的中期,这是在学术和公共话语往往与缓慢的文化,宗教和物质腐朽的伊斯兰教的领域,直到后殖民现在。与停留在简化和有缺陷的倒退概念上相反,塞尔瓦托挑战读者敢于超越那些相当naïve和基本(不)资格,探索独特而矛盾的方式,通过这些方式,文明在穆斯林世界被精心制作并保持完整。为了做到这一点,本书引入了一系列调整,以适应各自学术和公共话语中相关的关键意义。至关重要的是,公民社会这一概念本身——在分析伊斯兰社会及其在现代化潜力方面的假定缺陷中反复出现的一个比喻——被揭露为本质上是欧洲对现代性的追求的一个相当明显的特征,其静态和受限制的性质不适合作为一个连贯的概念来评价非欧洲社会的相关资格。另一个对理解塞尔瓦托的方法至关重要的词和概念是“伊斯兰世界”(Islamdom),这是从马歇尔·霍奇森(Marshall Hodgson)那里借来的,用来澄清他分析中所遵循的三维理解框架:宗教(伊斯兰教)、文明(伊斯兰教)和元制度或传统(伊斯兰教/伊斯兰教的联系和节点)方面,这些方面通常被使用免责声明Islam(ic)(286)所提及。通过将公民社会理解为文明在欧洲背景下制度化的具体方式,并由源自威斯特伐利亚秩序和随之而来的政治理论的国家理论所决定,Salvatore主张一个更开放的文明概念化,以便能够将不同形式的理解和建立形式的知识权力等式。在承认伊斯兰教对固化的社会学范畴构成的挑战时,塞尔瓦托提醒我们,社会学作为一个具有现代性概念的知识生产领域的强烈关注(或痴迷),并将其等同于“西方社会学的初始范式限制”,因为它无法逃脱社会学研究的比较模式(2)。在这里,他重新阐述了他在编辑的《伊斯兰评论143》卷中提出的论点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Armando Salvatore: "The Sociology of Islam: Knowledge, Power and Civility"
#09–2017 Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2016; pp. 344; ISBN 978-1-119-10997-6 (paperback) With this book, Armando Salvatore, Professor of Global Religious Studies at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, presents the first volume of a forthcoming trilogy on the sociology of Islam. This introductory volume focuses especially on the role and function of civility in Muslim thought and practice, considering mainly the timespan of the Middle Periods, which are in academic and public discourse often associated with the slow cultural, religious, and material decay of the realm of Islam, up until the postcolonial present. In contrast to resting on the simplified and defective notion of retrogression, Salvatore challenges the reader to dare go beyond those rather naïve and basic (dis) qualification in a quest to examine the unique and ambivalent ways through which civility was crafted and remained intact in the Muslim world. To accomplish this, the book introduces a row of adjustments to key significations that are relevant in the respective academic and public discourse. Crucially, the very notion of civil society – a recurring trope in the analysis of Islamic societies and their presumed deficiency regarding their modernizing potential – is unmasked as a quite distinct feature of an essentially European quest for modernity and in its static and circumscribed quality unfit to present itself as a coherent concept for evaluating the attendant qualifications in non-European societies. Another word and concept that is crucial for understanding Salvatore’s approach is the term “Islamdom,” borrowed from Marshall Hodgson, to clarify the three-dimensional frame of comprehension followed through in his analysis: the religious (Islam), civilizational (Islamdom), and meta-institutional or traditional (Islam/Islamdom nexus and node) aspects of what is commonly referred to by using the disclaimer Islam(ic) (286). By understanding civil society as the specific way of institutionalization of civility in a European context, determined by the theory of the State as it emanated from the Westphalian order and attendant political theory, Salvatore argues for a more open conceptualization of civility to be able to incorporate divergent forms of comprehending and instituting forms of the knowledgepower equation. In acknowledging the challenge that Islam poses to solidified sociological categories, Salvatore reminds us about the strong focus (or obsession) of sociology as a field of knowledge production with the concept of modernity and equates that with “initial paradigmatic limitations of Western sociology”, as it proves unable to escape the comparative mode of sociological research (2). Here, he rephrases an argument he made in the edited volume Islam review 143
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信