巴德·格利女权主义:战后家庭生活的神话

IF 0.3 Q4 WOMENS STUDIES
E. Holliday-Karre
{"title":"巴德·格利女权主义:战后家庭生活的神话","authors":"E. Holliday-Karre","doi":"10.23860/jfs.2019.16.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to feminist history, the 1950s constitute a lapse in feminist literature as women in the post-war era were ushered into the realm of domesticity. In this article I argue that this perceived literary “gap” was both created and perpetuated by feminist historians and scholars who insist that Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique (1963) was the defining feminist text of the time. I offer an alternative discourse to that of Friedan by presenting feminist writers who challenge, rather than adopt, masculine ideology as the means to women’s empowerment. I end by encouraging feminists to allow commonly dismissed feminists from the 1950s, like Cosmopolitan editor Helen Gurley Brown and domestic humor writers Shirley Jackson and Jean Kerr, into the feminist canon.","PeriodicalId":42387,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feminist Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bad Gurley Feminism: The Myth of Post-War Domesticity\",\"authors\":\"E. Holliday-Karre\",\"doi\":\"10.23860/jfs.2019.16.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to feminist history, the 1950s constitute a lapse in feminist literature as women in the post-war era were ushered into the realm of domesticity. In this article I argue that this perceived literary “gap” was both created and perpetuated by feminist historians and scholars who insist that Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique (1963) was the defining feminist text of the time. I offer an alternative discourse to that of Friedan by presenting feminist writers who challenge, rather than adopt, masculine ideology as the means to women’s empowerment. I end by encouraging feminists to allow commonly dismissed feminists from the 1950s, like Cosmopolitan editor Helen Gurley Brown and domestic humor writers Shirley Jackson and Jean Kerr, into the feminist canon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Feminist Scholarship\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Feminist Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23860/jfs.2019.16.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feminist Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23860/jfs.2019.16.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据女权主义的历史,20世纪50年代是战后女性进入家庭生活领域的女权主义文学的失误。在这篇文章中,我认为这种被感知到的文学“差距”是由女权主义历史学家和学者们创造和延续的,他们坚持认为贝蒂·弗里丹的《女性的奥秘》(1963)是当时定义女权主义的文本。我提供了一种与弗里丹不同的论述,介绍了一些女权主义作家,他们挑战(而不是采纳)男性意识形态,将其作为赋予女性权力的手段。最后,我鼓励女权主义者允许20世纪50年代被普遍忽视的女权主义者,比如《Cosmopolitan》杂志的编辑海伦·格利·布朗(Helen Gurley Brown)和国内幽默作家雪莉·杰克逊(Shirley Jackson)和吉恩·克尔(Jean Kerr),进入女权主义经典。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bad Gurley Feminism: The Myth of Post-War Domesticity
According to feminist history, the 1950s constitute a lapse in feminist literature as women in the post-war era were ushered into the realm of domesticity. In this article I argue that this perceived literary “gap” was both created and perpetuated by feminist historians and scholars who insist that Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique (1963) was the defining feminist text of the time. I offer an alternative discourse to that of Friedan by presenting feminist writers who challenge, rather than adopt, masculine ideology as the means to women’s empowerment. I end by encouraging feminists to allow commonly dismissed feminists from the 1950s, like Cosmopolitan editor Helen Gurley Brown and domestic humor writers Shirley Jackson and Jean Kerr, into the feminist canon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信