药物诱导睡眠内窥镜检查的评分者内和评分者间一致性

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
A. Kılavuz, Ali Bayram
{"title":"药物诱导睡眠内窥镜检查的评分者内和评分者间一致性","authors":"A. Kılavuz, Ali Bayram","doi":"10.32448/ENTUPDATES.596457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a valuable  tool which is used in the diagnosis of obstructive  sleep apnea (OUA). The aim of this study is to evaluate  inter-rater and intra-rater consistency of DISE. Methods: 36 OSA patients with Apnea-hypopne index>5  included in this study. DISE was performed and recorded  digitally for all patients, by the first author (OA1). VOTE  scores were noted to procedure report in patients’ charts.  Video records of DISE were blindly evaluated six months  after the last procedure, by observer 1 for the second  time (OA2) and by observer 2 (OB) for the first time. DISE  was evaluated by using VOTE classification. OA1 and OA2  scores were compared to determine intra-rater reliability  and OA2 and OB scores were compared to determine inter- rater reliability. Results: Inter-rater consistency of DISE was poor to good.  Highest consistency rate was found in velum at anteroposterior  configuration, while the lowest was found in  the same level at lateral configuration. Intra-rater consistency  of DISE was moderate to excellent. Highest consistency  rate was found in epiglottis at lateral configuration,  while the lowest was found in oropharynx level. Conclusion: OSA is condition with possible serious complications.  DISE is a tool that could change the course of  treatment in OSA. The validity of DISE is quite acceptable  although a golden standard classification tool could enable  us to “speak the exact same language” and will surely  increase the diagnostic success of DISE.","PeriodicalId":41744,"journal":{"name":"ENT Updates","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-rater and Inter-rater consistency of drug induced sleep endoscopy\",\"authors\":\"A. Kılavuz, Ali Bayram\",\"doi\":\"10.32448/ENTUPDATES.596457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a valuable  tool which is used in the diagnosis of obstructive  sleep apnea (OUA). The aim of this study is to evaluate  inter-rater and intra-rater consistency of DISE. Methods: 36 OSA patients with Apnea-hypopne index>5  included in this study. DISE was performed and recorded  digitally for all patients, by the first author (OA1). VOTE  scores were noted to procedure report in patients’ charts.  Video records of DISE were blindly evaluated six months  after the last procedure, by observer 1 for the second  time (OA2) and by observer 2 (OB) for the first time. DISE  was evaluated by using VOTE classification. OA1 and OA2  scores were compared to determine intra-rater reliability  and OA2 and OB scores were compared to determine inter- rater reliability. Results: Inter-rater consistency of DISE was poor to good.  Highest consistency rate was found in velum at anteroposterior  configuration, while the lowest was found in  the same level at lateral configuration. Intra-rater consistency  of DISE was moderate to excellent. Highest consistency  rate was found in epiglottis at lateral configuration,  while the lowest was found in oropharynx level. Conclusion: OSA is condition with possible serious complications.  DISE is a tool that could change the course of  treatment in OSA. The validity of DISE is quite acceptable  although a golden standard classification tool could enable  us to “speak the exact same language” and will surely  increase the diagnostic success of DISE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENT Updates\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENT Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32448/ENTUPDATES.596457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENT Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32448/ENTUPDATES.596457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:药物诱导睡眠内镜(DISE)是诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OUA)的一种有价值的工具。本研究的目的是评估分级间和分级内的一致性。方法:选取36例呼吸暂停低通气指数bbb50的OSA患者作为研究对象。由第一作者(OA1)对所有患者进行DISE并进行数字化记录。投票得分记录在患者病历的程序报告中。在最后一次手术后6个月,由观察者1第二次(OA2)和观察者2第一次(OB)对DISE的视频记录进行盲评价。采用VOTE分类法对病情进行评价。比较OA1和OA2评分来确定评分内信度,比较OA2和OB评分来确定评分间信度。结果:分级间一致性由差到好。前后位的一致性率最高,而侧位的一致性率最低。DISE的组内一致性为中等至优异。会厌侧位符合率最高,口咽部符合率最低。结论:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停是一种有严重并发症的疾病。DISE是一种可以改变OSA治疗过程的工具。尽管一个黄金标准的分类工具可以使我们“说完全相同的语言”,并且肯定会增加DISE的诊断成功率,但DISE的有效性是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-rater and Inter-rater consistency of drug induced sleep endoscopy
Objective: Drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a valuable  tool which is used in the diagnosis of obstructive  sleep apnea (OUA). The aim of this study is to evaluate  inter-rater and intra-rater consistency of DISE. Methods: 36 OSA patients with Apnea-hypopne index>5  included in this study. DISE was performed and recorded  digitally for all patients, by the first author (OA1). VOTE  scores were noted to procedure report in patients’ charts.  Video records of DISE were blindly evaluated six months  after the last procedure, by observer 1 for the second  time (OA2) and by observer 2 (OB) for the first time. DISE  was evaluated by using VOTE classification. OA1 and OA2  scores were compared to determine intra-rater reliability  and OA2 and OB scores were compared to determine inter- rater reliability. Results: Inter-rater consistency of DISE was poor to good.  Highest consistency rate was found in velum at anteroposterior  configuration, while the lowest was found in  the same level at lateral configuration. Intra-rater consistency  of DISE was moderate to excellent. Highest consistency  rate was found in epiglottis at lateral configuration,  while the lowest was found in oropharynx level. Conclusion: OSA is condition with possible serious complications.  DISE is a tool that could change the course of  treatment in OSA. The validity of DISE is quite acceptable  although a golden standard classification tool could enable  us to “speak the exact same language” and will surely  increase the diagnostic success of DISE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ENT Updates
ENT Updates OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信