国家对新自由主义危机的回应:1992-2017年中美社会净工资比较

IF 1.4 Q3 ECONOMICS
Katherine A. Moos, Hao Qi
{"title":"国家对新自由主义危机的回应:1992-2017年中美社会净工资比较","authors":"Katherine A. Moos, Hao Qi","doi":"10.1080/02692171.2022.2056155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We compare the welfare states and taxation regimes of the two largest economies in the world, China and the United States, from 1992 to 2017. We begin with a comparison of each country’s net social wage – that is, the difference between total benefits received by and taxes paid by labor – using two established methods. While the net social wage in the two countries exhibited similar trends, the increasing net social wage has distinctly different implications in the two countries due to their specific historical trajectories in the neoliberal era. In the US, the increasing net social wage reflects an ambivalent and reluctant response to workers’ social reproduction. In China, it reflects institutional changes in the welfare state, which we interpret as the Chinese state’s attempt to resolve the social-reproduction crisis caused by neoliberal reforms of the 1990s.","PeriodicalId":51618,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Applied Economics","volume":"37 1","pages":"23 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The state's response to the crisis of neoliberalism: a comparison of the net social wage in China and the United States, 1992-2017\",\"authors\":\"Katherine A. Moos, Hao Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02692171.2022.2056155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We compare the welfare states and taxation regimes of the two largest economies in the world, China and the United States, from 1992 to 2017. We begin with a comparison of each country’s net social wage – that is, the difference between total benefits received by and taxes paid by labor – using two established methods. While the net social wage in the two countries exhibited similar trends, the increasing net social wage has distinctly different implications in the two countries due to their specific historical trajectories in the neoliberal era. In the US, the increasing net social wage reflects an ambivalent and reluctant response to workers’ social reproduction. In China, it reflects institutional changes in the welfare state, which we interpret as the Chinese state’s attempt to resolve the social-reproduction crisis caused by neoliberal reforms of the 1990s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Applied Economics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Applied Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2022.2056155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2022.2056155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们比较了1992年至2017年世界上最大的两个经济体——中国和美国的福利国家和税收制度。我们首先用两种既定的方法比较了每个国家的净社会工资——即劳动者获得的总福利与缴纳的税款之间的差额。虽然两国的社会净工资表现出相似的趋势,但由于两国在新自由主义时代的特定历史轨迹,社会净工资的增长在两国具有明显不同的含义。在美国,不断增长的社会净工资反映了对工人社会再生产的矛盾和不情愿的反应。在中国,它反映了福利国家的制度变化,我们将其解释为中国政府试图解决20世纪90年代新自由主义改革造成的社会再生产危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The state's response to the crisis of neoliberalism: a comparison of the net social wage in China and the United States, 1992-2017
ABSTRACT We compare the welfare states and taxation regimes of the two largest economies in the world, China and the United States, from 1992 to 2017. We begin with a comparison of each country’s net social wage – that is, the difference between total benefits received by and taxes paid by labor – using two established methods. While the net social wage in the two countries exhibited similar trends, the increasing net social wage has distinctly different implications in the two countries due to their specific historical trajectories in the neoliberal era. In the US, the increasing net social wage reflects an ambivalent and reluctant response to workers’ social reproduction. In China, it reflects institutional changes in the welfare state, which we interpret as the Chinese state’s attempt to resolve the social-reproduction crisis caused by neoliberal reforms of the 1990s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: International Review of Applied Economics is devoted to the practical applications of economic ideas. Applied economics is widely interpreted to embrace empirical work and the application of economics to the evaluation and development of economic policies. The interaction between empirical work and economic policy is an important feature of the journal. The Journal is peer reviewed and international in scope. Articles that draw lessons from the experience of one country for the benefit of others, or that seek to make cross-country comparisons are particularly welcomed. Contributions which discuss policy issues from theoretical positions neglected in other journals are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信