分散、扭曲和困境:联合国维和行动中保护平民的外部性

IF 1.2 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
A. Day, Charles T. Hunt
{"title":"分散、扭曲和困境:联合国维和行动中保护平民的外部性","authors":"A. Day, Charles T. Hunt","doi":"10.1080/13698249.2022.1995680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the unintended consequences associated with the protection of civilians (PoC) mandate in United Nations peacekeeping. Drawing primarily on two case studies – the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) and South Sudan (UNMISS) – we advance three lines of argument. First, the gravitational pull of PoC can distract missions from other, often interdependent, priorities. Second, the implementation of PoC can distort intended impacts. Third, these distractions and distortions can combine to produce dilemmas for mission architects, leadership and implementers. We conclude by identifying how these quandaries can ultimately make civilian protection, sustainable peace, and mission exits more elusive.","PeriodicalId":51785,"journal":{"name":"Civil Wars","volume":"24 1","pages":"97 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distractions, Distortions and Dilemmas: The Externalities of Protecting Civilians in United Nations Peacekeeping\",\"authors\":\"A. Day, Charles T. Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698249.2022.1995680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article explores the unintended consequences associated with the protection of civilians (PoC) mandate in United Nations peacekeeping. Drawing primarily on two case studies – the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) and South Sudan (UNMISS) – we advance three lines of argument. First, the gravitational pull of PoC can distract missions from other, often interdependent, priorities. Second, the implementation of PoC can distort intended impacts. Third, these distractions and distortions can combine to produce dilemmas for mission architects, leadership and implementers. We conclude by identifying how these quandaries can ultimately make civilian protection, sustainable peace, and mission exits more elusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Wars\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"97 - 116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Wars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2022.1995680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2022.1995680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文探讨了联合国维和行动中保护平民任务的意外后果。我们主要根据两个案例研究——刚果民主共和国(联刚稳定团)和南苏丹特派团(南苏丹特派团)——提出了三条论点。首先,PoC的引力可能会分散任务对其他(通常是相互依存的)优先事项的注意力。其次,PoC的实施可能会扭曲预期影响。第三,这些干扰和扭曲可能会给任务架构师、领导层和执行者带来困境。最后,我们确定了这些困境如何最终使平民保护、可持续和平和任务退出变得更加难以捉摸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distractions, Distortions and Dilemmas: The Externalities of Protecting Civilians in United Nations Peacekeeping
ABSTRACT This article explores the unintended consequences associated with the protection of civilians (PoC) mandate in United Nations peacekeeping. Drawing primarily on two case studies – the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) and South Sudan (UNMISS) – we advance three lines of argument. First, the gravitational pull of PoC can distract missions from other, often interdependent, priorities. Second, the implementation of PoC can distort intended impacts. Third, these distractions and distortions can combine to produce dilemmas for mission architects, leadership and implementers. We conclude by identifying how these quandaries can ultimately make civilian protection, sustainable peace, and mission exits more elusive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Wars
Civil Wars POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信