涨潮?以色列的混血家庭

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Sylvie Fogiel-Bijaoui
{"title":"涨潮?以色列的混血家庭","authors":"Sylvie Fogiel-Bijaoui","doi":"10.1080/13531042.2017.1555935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past few years, scholars have shown a growing interest in mixed families and mixedness. This is reflected in numerous articles and books as well as in special issues of prominent journals devoted to the topic, such as The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science in 2015, Ethnicities in 2016, and Recherches Familiales in 2017. Quite surprisingly, and despite the growing interest in this issue, there is no agreedupon scholarly definition of mixedness. A common definition of mixed families, however, is that they are constituted by unconventional and even forbidden marriage or by unions between individuals who belong to specific groups—such as race, nation, class, ethnicity, religion, or some combination of these—that are constructed, depending on the time, the place, and the context, as “different” and socially “distant.”Accordingly, it is also assumed that by their very nature mixed families threaten the social order and collective identities by challenging the prevailing endogamous marital norms and by creating new spaces that disrupt social hierarchies. Moreover, by forming bridges between different groups in society they redraw social boundaries that divide or demarcate individuals and groups and indeed may change societal mainstreams. Also, it is generally agreed that these “barrier-breaking” families are becoming more common, for not only are they part of the globalization process and its intense migration flows, they are also boosted by the continual development of knowledge exchange, global tourism, sports and art, transport, communication, and medical technologies; the emergence of transnational marriage markets; and the growing diversification of family forms. At the current stage of research, it can be argued that the growing body of scholarship already provides us with pivotal insights into the ways that mixedness is formed, lived, contested, fought against, or celebrated, in terms of both the individual and society. It can also be assumed that in the future this research trend will continue, because, as scholars argue, academia itself has a substantial role to play in conceptualizing these processes. Yet, despite the ever-growing number of families that are mixed across national, cultural, racial, and religious boundaries worldwide, it appears that most of the existing research and theorizing on mixedness relates to Western countries, with a special emphasis on English-speaking, North American, and British contexts, where most of the research is carried out. Consequently, research on mixedness in the global village is","PeriodicalId":43363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Israeli History","volume":"36 1","pages":"103 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13531042.2017.1555935","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rising Tide? Mixed families in Israel\",\"authors\":\"Sylvie Fogiel-Bijaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13531042.2017.1555935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past few years, scholars have shown a growing interest in mixed families and mixedness. This is reflected in numerous articles and books as well as in special issues of prominent journals devoted to the topic, such as The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science in 2015, Ethnicities in 2016, and Recherches Familiales in 2017. Quite surprisingly, and despite the growing interest in this issue, there is no agreedupon scholarly definition of mixedness. A common definition of mixed families, however, is that they are constituted by unconventional and even forbidden marriage or by unions between individuals who belong to specific groups—such as race, nation, class, ethnicity, religion, or some combination of these—that are constructed, depending on the time, the place, and the context, as “different” and socially “distant.”Accordingly, it is also assumed that by their very nature mixed families threaten the social order and collective identities by challenging the prevailing endogamous marital norms and by creating new spaces that disrupt social hierarchies. Moreover, by forming bridges between different groups in society they redraw social boundaries that divide or demarcate individuals and groups and indeed may change societal mainstreams. Also, it is generally agreed that these “barrier-breaking” families are becoming more common, for not only are they part of the globalization process and its intense migration flows, they are also boosted by the continual development of knowledge exchange, global tourism, sports and art, transport, communication, and medical technologies; the emergence of transnational marriage markets; and the growing diversification of family forms. At the current stage of research, it can be argued that the growing body of scholarship already provides us with pivotal insights into the ways that mixedness is formed, lived, contested, fought against, or celebrated, in terms of both the individual and society. It can also be assumed that in the future this research trend will continue, because, as scholars argue, academia itself has a substantial role to play in conceptualizing these processes. Yet, despite the ever-growing number of families that are mixed across national, cultural, racial, and religious boundaries worldwide, it appears that most of the existing research and theorizing on mixedness relates to Western countries, with a special emphasis on English-speaking, North American, and British contexts, where most of the research is carried out. Consequently, research on mixedness in the global village is\",\"PeriodicalId\":43363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Israeli History\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"103 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13531042.2017.1555935\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Israeli History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2017.1555935\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Israeli History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2017.1555935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在过去的几年里,学者们对混血家庭和混血表现出越来越大的兴趣。这反映在许多文章和书籍以及专门讨论该主题的著名期刊的特刊中,例如2015年的《美国政治与社会科学院年鉴》、2016年的《种族》和2017年的《家庭研究》。令人惊讶的是,尽管人们对这个问题的兴趣越来越大,但对“混杂”的学术定义还没有达成一致。然而,对混合家庭的一个常见定义是,它们是由非常规的甚至被禁止的婚姻或属于特定群体的个体之间的结合构成的——比如种族、国家、阶级、种族、宗教或这些群体的某种组合——根据时间、地点和背景,这些群体被构建为“不同的”和社会上的“遥远的”。因此,人们还认为,就其本质而言,混合家庭挑战了普遍存在的内婚婚姻规范,并创造了破坏社会等级制度的新空间,从而威胁到社会秩序和集体身份。此外,通过在社会中不同群体之间建立桥梁,它们重新划定了划分个人和群体的社会界限,甚至可能改变社会主流。此外,人们普遍认为,这些"打破障碍"的家庭正变得越来越普遍,因为它们不仅是全球化进程及其密集移民流动的一部分,而且还受到知识交流、全球旅游、体育和艺术、运输、通信和医疗技术不断发展的推动;跨国婚姻市场的出现;以及家庭形式的日益多样化。在目前的研究阶段,可以说,越来越多的学术研究已经为我们提供了关键的见解,让我们了解混合是如何形成的,生活的,争论的,反对的,或庆祝的,从个人和社会的角度来看。也可以假设,这种研究趋势将在未来继续下去,因为正如学者们所认为的那样,学术界本身在概念化这些过程方面发挥着重要作用。然而,尽管世界范围内跨越国家、文化、种族和宗教界限的混血家庭数量不断增加,但似乎大多数现有的关于混血的研究和理论都与西方国家有关,特别强调英语、北美和英国的背景,大多数研究都是在这些国家进行的。因此,对地球村的混杂性的研究是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Rising Tide? Mixed families in Israel
Over the past few years, scholars have shown a growing interest in mixed families and mixedness. This is reflected in numerous articles and books as well as in special issues of prominent journals devoted to the topic, such as The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science in 2015, Ethnicities in 2016, and Recherches Familiales in 2017. Quite surprisingly, and despite the growing interest in this issue, there is no agreedupon scholarly definition of mixedness. A common definition of mixed families, however, is that they are constituted by unconventional and even forbidden marriage or by unions between individuals who belong to specific groups—such as race, nation, class, ethnicity, religion, or some combination of these—that are constructed, depending on the time, the place, and the context, as “different” and socially “distant.”Accordingly, it is also assumed that by their very nature mixed families threaten the social order and collective identities by challenging the prevailing endogamous marital norms and by creating new spaces that disrupt social hierarchies. Moreover, by forming bridges between different groups in society they redraw social boundaries that divide or demarcate individuals and groups and indeed may change societal mainstreams. Also, it is generally agreed that these “barrier-breaking” families are becoming more common, for not only are they part of the globalization process and its intense migration flows, they are also boosted by the continual development of knowledge exchange, global tourism, sports and art, transport, communication, and medical technologies; the emergence of transnational marriage markets; and the growing diversification of family forms. At the current stage of research, it can be argued that the growing body of scholarship already provides us with pivotal insights into the ways that mixedness is formed, lived, contested, fought against, or celebrated, in terms of both the individual and society. It can also be assumed that in the future this research trend will continue, because, as scholars argue, academia itself has a substantial role to play in conceptualizing these processes. Yet, despite the ever-growing number of families that are mixed across national, cultural, racial, and religious boundaries worldwide, it appears that most of the existing research and theorizing on mixedness relates to Western countries, with a special emphasis on English-speaking, North American, and British contexts, where most of the research is carried out. Consequently, research on mixedness in the global village is
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信