“但没有证明”

IF 0.4 3区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Journal of Historical Pragmatics Pub Date : 2019-06-04 DOI:10.1075/JHP.00026.LUT

Ursula Lutzky

{"title":"“但没有证明”","authors":"Ursula Lutzky","doi":"10.1075/JHP.00026.LUT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previous studies have found discourse markers to be represented with only low frequencies in Early Modern English\n trial proceedings, especially when compared to other dialogic and fictional text types from the same period. Nevertheless, they\n comprise certain classes of markers, such as contrastive markers, which operate on different levels of discourse. This study aims\n to provide further insights into the use of the coordinator but in a sociopragmatically annotated corpus of trial\n proceedings from the period 1560 to 1760. Drawing on contextual information, the analysis will assess the distribution of\n but throughout the Early Modern English period and address certain peaks in its use. In addition, the\n sociopragmatic information included in the corpus will be consulted to discover which trial participants used the form repeatedly\n in their speech and with which functions. Overall, this study will therefore offer an innovative sociopragmatic profile of\n but as a contrastive marker in Early Modern English trials.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“But it is not prov’d”\",\"authors\":\"Ursula Lutzky\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JHP.00026.LUT\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Previous studies have found discourse markers to be represented with only low frequencies in Early Modern English\\n trial proceedings, especially when compared to other dialogic and fictional text types from the same period. Nevertheless, they\\n comprise certain classes of markers, such as contrastive markers, which operate on different levels of discourse. This study aims\\n to provide further insights into the use of the coordinator but in a sociopragmatically annotated corpus of trial\\n proceedings from the period 1560 to 1760. Drawing on contextual information, the analysis will assess the distribution of\\n but throughout the Early Modern English period and address certain peaks in its use. In addition, the\\n sociopragmatic information included in the corpus will be consulted to discover which trial participants used the form repeatedly\\n in their speech and with which functions. Overall, this study will therefore offer an innovative sociopragmatic profile of\\n but as a contrastive marker in Early Modern English trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.00026.LUT\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.00026.LUT","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

先前的研究发现，在早期现代英语审判程序中，话语标记仅以低频率表示，特别是与同一时期的其他对话和虚构文本类型相比。然而，它们包含了某些类型的标记，如对比标记，它们在不同的话语层面上起作用。本研究旨在进一步深入了解协调者的使用，但在1560年至1760年期间的社会实用注释的审判程序语料库中。根据上下文信息，分析将评估“but”在整个早期现代英语时期的分布，并指出其使用的某些高峰。此外，将参考语料库中包含的社会语用信息，以发现哪些试验参与者在其讲话中重复使用了该形式以及具有哪些功能。总的来说，本研究将提供一个创新的社会语用的轮廓，但作为一个对比标记在早期现代英语审判。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“But it is not prov’d”

Previous studies have found discourse markers to be represented with only low frequencies in Early Modern English trial proceedings, especially when compared to other dialogic and fictional text types from the same period. Nevertheless, they comprise certain classes of markers, such as contrastive markers, which operate on different levels of discourse. This study aims to provide further insights into the use of the coordinator but in a sociopragmatically annotated corpus of trial proceedings from the period 1560 to 1760. Drawing on contextual information, the analysis will assess the distribution of but throughout the Early Modern English period and address certain peaks in its use. In addition, the sociopragmatic information included in the corpus will be consulted to discover which trial participants used the form repeatedly in their speech and with which functions. Overall, this study will therefore offer an innovative sociopragmatic profile of but as a contrastive marker in Early Modern English trials.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Historical Pragmatics Multiple-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.