转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(mRCC)的一线免疫肿瘤联合治疗:III期临床试验的系统回顾

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Kidney Cancer Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI:10.3233/kca-210123
A. Hahn, A. Shah, M. Campbell
{"title":"转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(mRCC)的一线免疫肿瘤联合治疗:III期临床试验的系统回顾","authors":"A. Hahn, A. Shah, M. Campbell","doi":"10.3233/kca-210123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors rapidly changed treatment for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). First-line treatment now includes multiple immuno-oncology (IO) combinations that were approved over a short time period and were not directly compared in randomized clinical trials. Thus, clinicians face a challenge in individualizing first-line treatment to optimize clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review clinical outcomes for first-line IO combinations for patients with mRCC. METHODS: Literature reporting outcomes from phase III clinical trials that evaluated first-line IO combination therapies was identified through a search of the PubMed electronic database following PRISMA guidelines. Abstracts were screened to identify manuscripts that fit the search criteria, and then, a descriptive review was performed. RESULTS: Our literature search identified 2,229 abstracts that met the initial search criteria, and then, it was narrowed to 431 abstracts using filters for “clinical trial” and a “ten year” time window. After review of the abstracts, six manuscripts were selected for data extraction and subsequent review. CONCLUSION: When compared to sunitinib, four IO combinations improved overall survival as first-line treatment, and five improved progression free survival for patients with mRCC. These IO combination therapies have unique characteristics, so clinicians should take into account patient and cancer factors to individualize treatment recommendations.","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-Line Immune-Oncology Combinations for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC): A Systematic Review of Phase III Clinical Trials\",\"authors\":\"A. Hahn, A. Shah, M. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/kca-210123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors rapidly changed treatment for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). First-line treatment now includes multiple immuno-oncology (IO) combinations that were approved over a short time period and were not directly compared in randomized clinical trials. Thus, clinicians face a challenge in individualizing first-line treatment to optimize clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review clinical outcomes for first-line IO combinations for patients with mRCC. METHODS: Literature reporting outcomes from phase III clinical trials that evaluated first-line IO combination therapies was identified through a search of the PubMed electronic database following PRISMA guidelines. Abstracts were screened to identify manuscripts that fit the search criteria, and then, a descriptive review was performed. RESULTS: Our literature search identified 2,229 abstracts that met the initial search criteria, and then, it was narrowed to 431 abstracts using filters for “clinical trial” and a “ten year” time window. After review of the abstracts, six manuscripts were selected for data extraction and subsequent review. CONCLUSION: When compared to sunitinib, four IO combinations improved overall survival as first-line treatment, and five improved progression free survival for patients with mRCC. These IO combination therapies have unique characteristics, so clinicians should take into account patient and cancer factors to individualize treatment recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-210123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-210123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂的引入迅速改变了转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的治疗方法。一线治疗现在包括多种免疫肿瘤学(IO)组合,这些组合在短时间内被批准,并且没有在随机临床试验中直接比较。因此,临床医生面临着个性化一线治疗以优化临床结果的挑战。目的:我们试图系统地回顾一线IO联合治疗mRCC患者的临床结果。方法:根据PRISMA指南,通过检索PubMed电子数据库来确定评估一线IO联合治疗的III期临床试验结果的文献。对摘要进行筛选,以确定符合搜索标准的手稿,然后进行描述性审查。结果:我们的文献检索确定了2229篇符合初始检索标准的摘要,然后,使用“临床试验”过滤器和“十年”时间窗口将其缩小到431篇摘要。摘要审阅后,选择6篇稿件进行数据提取和后续审阅。结论:与舒尼替尼相比,4种IO组合作为一线治疗可改善mRCC患者的总生存期,5种可改善mRCC患者的无进展生存期。这些IO联合治疗具有独特的特点,因此临床医生应考虑患者和癌症因素来个性化治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-Line Immune-Oncology Combinations for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC): A Systematic Review of Phase III Clinical Trials
BACKGROUND: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors rapidly changed treatment for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). First-line treatment now includes multiple immuno-oncology (IO) combinations that were approved over a short time period and were not directly compared in randomized clinical trials. Thus, clinicians face a challenge in individualizing first-line treatment to optimize clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review clinical outcomes for first-line IO combinations for patients with mRCC. METHODS: Literature reporting outcomes from phase III clinical trials that evaluated first-line IO combination therapies was identified through a search of the PubMed electronic database following PRISMA guidelines. Abstracts were screened to identify manuscripts that fit the search criteria, and then, a descriptive review was performed. RESULTS: Our literature search identified 2,229 abstracts that met the initial search criteria, and then, it was narrowed to 431 abstracts using filters for “clinical trial” and a “ten year” time window. After review of the abstracts, six manuscripts were selected for data extraction and subsequent review. CONCLUSION: When compared to sunitinib, four IO combinations improved overall survival as first-line treatment, and five improved progression free survival for patients with mRCC. These IO combination therapies have unique characteristics, so clinicians should take into account patient and cancer factors to individualize treatment recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Cancer
Kidney Cancer Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信