使用质量改进数据库来观察学生开办的免费诊所的护理差距

Jess Grimmond, M. Menning
{"title":"使用质量改进数据库来观察学生开办的免费诊所的护理差距","authors":"Jess Grimmond, M. Menning","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Student Health Alliance Reaching Indigent Needy Groups (SHARING) clinics are student run freeclinics (SRFCs) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center that serve low income, uninsured adultsin Omaha, Nebraska. Like many other SRFCs, they face multiple barriers to providing high quality care.To address this, the SHARING Quality Improvement (QI) Database was created. QI has many definitions,but, overall, it is a method of analyzing clinic performance and the changes made to improvethe clinic. Before this database, there was no way of continuously tracking clinic metrics over time, soprevious QI projects required timely data abstraction that often only evaluated retrospective outcomeswith limited real-time data to track clinical outcomes as changes were implemented therebylimiting our ability to implement further changes to improve patient health. A review of SRFC literaturereveals a lack of a model or guide on how to assess quality of care in SRFCs and track patient dataover time. This study seeks to fill this gap. Our database consists of a patient list of electronic medicalrecords that were compiled in the charting system Epic. The patient data is exported into a MicrosoftExcel document each month and clinic metrics are analyzed, thus providing a real-time dashboard ofquality metrics for the clinic. This database will be utilized to inform decisions regarding the reform ofclinic processes. This database model can be used at other SRFCs to monitor quality of care providedat their clinics and implement QI measures accordingly.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employing a Quality Improvement Database to Observe the Gaps in Care at a Student-Run Free Clinic\",\"authors\":\"Jess Grimmond, M. Menning\",\"doi\":\"10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Student Health Alliance Reaching Indigent Needy Groups (SHARING) clinics are student run freeclinics (SRFCs) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center that serve low income, uninsured adultsin Omaha, Nebraska. Like many other SRFCs, they face multiple barriers to providing high quality care.To address this, the SHARING Quality Improvement (QI) Database was created. QI has many definitions,but, overall, it is a method of analyzing clinic performance and the changes made to improvethe clinic. Before this database, there was no way of continuously tracking clinic metrics over time, soprevious QI projects required timely data abstraction that often only evaluated retrospective outcomeswith limited real-time data to track clinical outcomes as changes were implemented therebylimiting our ability to implement further changes to improve patient health. A review of SRFC literaturereveals a lack of a model or guide on how to assess quality of care in SRFCs and track patient dataover time. This study seeks to fill this gap. Our database consists of a patient list of electronic medicalrecords that were compiled in the charting system Epic. The patient data is exported into a MicrosoftExcel document each month and clinic metrics are analyzed, thus providing a real-time dashboard ofquality metrics for the clinic. This database will be utilized to inform decisions regarding the reform ofclinic processes. This database model can be used at other SRFCs to monitor quality of care providedat their clinics and implement QI measures accordingly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of student-run clinics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of student-run clinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生健康联盟帮助愤怒的需要群体(SHARING)诊所是内布拉斯加大学医学中心的学生经营的免费诊所,为内布拉斯加州奥马哈的低收入、没有保险的成年人提供服务。与许多其他SRFC一样,他们在提供高质量护理方面面临多重障碍。为了解决这个问题,创建了共享质量改进(QI)数据库。QI有很多定义,但总的来说,它是一种分析临床表现和为改善临床而做出的改变的方法。在这个数据库之前,没有办法随着时间的推移持续跟踪临床指标,以前的QI项目需要及时的数据提取,通常只评估回顾性结果,而实时数据有限,无法在实施变化时跟踪临床结果,这限制了我们实施进一步变化以改善患者健康的能力。对SRFC文献的回顾表明,缺乏关于如何评估SRFC的护理质量和跟踪患者数据的模型或指南。这项研究试图填补这一空白。我们的数据库由电子医疗记录的患者列表组成,这些记录是在图表系统Epic中汇编的。每月将患者数据导出到MicrosoftExcel文档中,并对诊所指标进行分析,从而为诊所提供质量指标的实时仪表板。该数据库将用于为有关临床程序改革的决策提供信息。该数据库模型可用于其他SRFC,以监测其诊所提供的护理质量,并相应地实施QI措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employing a Quality Improvement Database to Observe the Gaps in Care at a Student-Run Free Clinic
The Student Health Alliance Reaching Indigent Needy Groups (SHARING) clinics are student run freeclinics (SRFCs) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center that serve low income, uninsured adultsin Omaha, Nebraska. Like many other SRFCs, they face multiple barriers to providing high quality care.To address this, the SHARING Quality Improvement (QI) Database was created. QI has many definitions,but, overall, it is a method of analyzing clinic performance and the changes made to improvethe clinic. Before this database, there was no way of continuously tracking clinic metrics over time, soprevious QI projects required timely data abstraction that often only evaluated retrospective outcomeswith limited real-time data to track clinical outcomes as changes were implemented therebylimiting our ability to implement further changes to improve patient health. A review of SRFC literaturereveals a lack of a model or guide on how to assess quality of care in SRFCs and track patient dataover time. This study seeks to fill this gap. Our database consists of a patient list of electronic medicalrecords that were compiled in the charting system Epic. The patient data is exported into a MicrosoftExcel document each month and clinic metrics are analyzed, thus providing a real-time dashboard ofquality metrics for the clinic. This database will be utilized to inform decisions regarding the reform ofclinic processes. This database model can be used at other SRFCs to monitor quality of care providedat their clinics and implement QI measures accordingly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信