新冠肺炎大流行时期从认知风格看学生解决错误的线性等式系统两变量型HOTS

Afinda Azimatul Khusna, R. E. Utami, F. Nursyahidah
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行时期从认知风格看学生解决错误的线性等式系统两变量型HOTS","authors":"Afinda Azimatul Khusna, R. E. Utami, F. Nursyahidah","doi":"10.21274/jtm.2021.4.1.77-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to describe errors done by students in solving HOTS typed linear equation of two variables problem seen from the cognitive style in a Covid-19 pandemic era. This research uses a qualitative approach. Research subjects consist of 4 students selected among 31 students from class IX Junior High School 1 Petarukan, grouped into two students with cognitive style field-dependent (FD) and two students with cognitive style field-independent (FI). Subjects cognitive style was determined by Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) score, while errors in problem-solving were determined through TKPS and interviews. Field-dependent subjects tend to make errors in transformation and encoding with low or fair fallacy rate. On the other side, field-independent subjects tend to make errors in understanding the problems with low fallacy rate. The causes of errors made by field-dependent subjects are not being able to make complete mathematical models and not showing what they had searched. Meanwhile, field-independent subjects were incapable of making sketches perfectly. Other researchers' recommendation explains only errors in reading, transformation, processing capability, and encoding of students with cognitive style FD and FI. In this context, there are still a lot of other errors done by students. Therefore, the next researcher needs to conduct further research with better execution.","PeriodicalId":52842,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tadris Matematika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Tipe HOTS Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif di Masa Pandemi Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"Afinda Azimatul Khusna, R. E. Utami, F. Nursyahidah\",\"doi\":\"10.21274/jtm.2021.4.1.77-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to describe errors done by students in solving HOTS typed linear equation of two variables problem seen from the cognitive style in a Covid-19 pandemic era. This research uses a qualitative approach. Research subjects consist of 4 students selected among 31 students from class IX Junior High School 1 Petarukan, grouped into two students with cognitive style field-dependent (FD) and two students with cognitive style field-independent (FI). Subjects cognitive style was determined by Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) score, while errors in problem-solving were determined through TKPS and interviews. Field-dependent subjects tend to make errors in transformation and encoding with low or fair fallacy rate. On the other side, field-independent subjects tend to make errors in understanding the problems with low fallacy rate. The causes of errors made by field-dependent subjects are not being able to make complete mathematical models and not showing what they had searched. Meanwhile, field-independent subjects were incapable of making sketches perfectly. Other researchers' recommendation explains only errors in reading, transformation, processing capability, and encoding of students with cognitive style FD and FI. In this context, there are still a lot of other errors done by students. Therefore, the next researcher needs to conduct further research with better execution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Tadris Matematika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Tadris Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2021.4.1.77-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tadris Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2021.4.1.77-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在从新冠肺炎大流行时代的认知方式描述学生在求解HOTS型双变量线性方程问题时的错误。本研究采用定性方法。研究对象为4名学生,选取31名槟城第一初中九班学生,分为认知风格场依赖型(FD)学生2名和认知风格场独立型(FI)学生2名。被试的认知风格采用小组嵌入图测验(Group Embedded figure Test, GEFT)评分,问题解决错误采用TKPS和访谈。场相关被试在转换和编码方面容易出现错误,其错误率较低或一般。另一方面,领域独立的被试在理解错误率较低的问题时容易出错。字段相关的研究对象所犯错误的原因是不能建立完整的数学模型,也不能显示他们所搜索的内容。与此同时,独立于现场的受试者无法完美地绘制草图。其他研究者的建议只能解释认知风格FD和FI学生在阅读、转换、加工能力和编码方面的错误。在这种情况下,学生还会犯很多其他错误。因此,下一个研究者需要进行更深入的研究和更好的执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Tipe HOTS Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif di Masa Pandemi Covid-19
This research aimed to describe errors done by students in solving HOTS typed linear equation of two variables problem seen from the cognitive style in a Covid-19 pandemic era. This research uses a qualitative approach. Research subjects consist of 4 students selected among 31 students from class IX Junior High School 1 Petarukan, grouped into two students with cognitive style field-dependent (FD) and two students with cognitive style field-independent (FI). Subjects cognitive style was determined by Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) score, while errors in problem-solving were determined through TKPS and interviews. Field-dependent subjects tend to make errors in transformation and encoding with low or fair fallacy rate. On the other side, field-independent subjects tend to make errors in understanding the problems with low fallacy rate. The causes of errors made by field-dependent subjects are not being able to make complete mathematical models and not showing what they had searched. Meanwhile, field-independent subjects were incapable of making sketches perfectly. Other researchers' recommendation explains only errors in reading, transformation, processing capability, and encoding of students with cognitive style FD and FI. In this context, there are still a lot of other errors done by students. Therefore, the next researcher needs to conduct further research with better execution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信