前言

Q2 Engineering
T. Länsivaara
{"title":"前言","authors":"T. Länsivaara","doi":"10.1080/1023697X.2018.1482593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Landslides and debris flows pose a serious risk to human lives and the built environment in many parts of the world. In Hong Kong alone, an average of around 320 landslides occurred each year from 1945 to 2000, with significant loss of life during the decade 1970–1980. Increasing population has pushed human habitation more and more into potential hazard areas. Even in less densely populated areas, landslides and debris flows may endanger infrastructure networks vital to the community. Increasing precipitation due to climate change is likely to accelerate the occurrence of landslides. Although slope stability analysis is one of the oldest disciplines in geotechnical engineering, there is an increasing demand for new research to better understand the core fundamentals of landslide and debris flow failures, so that we can more accurately predict them in today’s changing climate conditions and are able to design more robust hazard mitigation measures. I am honoured and delighted to introduce five high-quality papers and one technical note on this subject to the readers of the HKIE Transactions theme issue on “Landslides and Debris Flow – Theory and Design, Mitigation, Stabilisation and Monitoring”. The first paper by Cheung et al. discusses the use of advanced numerical analysis to model debris flows and barrier interaction. The analyses include landslide debris mobility, the structural analysis of flexible barriers, and coupled analysis of debris impact on a flexible barrier. Verification of the numerical models has been carried out against actual landslides and impact tests with good success. The article by Kwan et al. presents a very helpful summary of the many research studies concerning technical advancements in the design of both rigid and flexible barriers. The reader can pick up helpful studies, for example, on the performance of cushioning materials for reducing dynamic impact on rigid barriers, or the important aspect of serviceability of flexible barriers when a stream crosses the barrier. Lo et al. present the results of an interesting case study of a large-scale failure that occurred following an intense storm on 21 May 2016. The investigations included detailed engineering geological mapping, ground investigation and analyses to diagnose the probable causes of failure and the likelihood of further large-scale instability. The landslide occurred in difficult mountainous terrain, which presented a major challenge for the investigators. From the many important conclusions of the paper, I would like to mention that the failurewas triggered by rain-induced cleft water pressure and that a three-dimensional slope stability assessment was needed for the complex geometry. Sze et al. introduce a new type of flexible barrier in which the shape of the valley is better accounted for, resulting in more favourable geometry and greater structural effectiveness. The design and analysis of such valley-shaped barriers are presented using a state-ofthe-art analytical force approach. The authors propose lower and upper bound characteristic design curves for the energy-dissipating devices. In the paper by Yifru et al., the performance of a screen-type debris-flow countermeasure is studied in laboratory conditions. The essence of this approach is to reduce the energy of the flow by separating the water from the debris-flow. Different screen types were studied, and an optimum screen opening width identified. Finally, Ip et al. present an interesting note on the challenges encounteredwhen building an overhead line circuit in very difficult terrain, including potential landslide and rockfall areas. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the authors, reviewers, members of the HKIE Transactions Committee and the HKIE Secretariat for their time and dedication in launching this theme issue for the benefit of the engineering profession inHongKong and the rest of the world.","PeriodicalId":35587,"journal":{"name":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1023697X.2018.1482593","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreword\",\"authors\":\"T. Länsivaara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1023697X.2018.1482593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Landslides and debris flows pose a serious risk to human lives and the built environment in many parts of the world. In Hong Kong alone, an average of around 320 landslides occurred each year from 1945 to 2000, with significant loss of life during the decade 1970–1980. Increasing population has pushed human habitation more and more into potential hazard areas. Even in less densely populated areas, landslides and debris flows may endanger infrastructure networks vital to the community. Increasing precipitation due to climate change is likely to accelerate the occurrence of landslides. Although slope stability analysis is one of the oldest disciplines in geotechnical engineering, there is an increasing demand for new research to better understand the core fundamentals of landslide and debris flow failures, so that we can more accurately predict them in today’s changing climate conditions and are able to design more robust hazard mitigation measures. I am honoured and delighted to introduce five high-quality papers and one technical note on this subject to the readers of the HKIE Transactions theme issue on “Landslides and Debris Flow – Theory and Design, Mitigation, Stabilisation and Monitoring”. The first paper by Cheung et al. discusses the use of advanced numerical analysis to model debris flows and barrier interaction. The analyses include landslide debris mobility, the structural analysis of flexible barriers, and coupled analysis of debris impact on a flexible barrier. Verification of the numerical models has been carried out against actual landslides and impact tests with good success. The article by Kwan et al. presents a very helpful summary of the many research studies concerning technical advancements in the design of both rigid and flexible barriers. The reader can pick up helpful studies, for example, on the performance of cushioning materials for reducing dynamic impact on rigid barriers, or the important aspect of serviceability of flexible barriers when a stream crosses the barrier. Lo et al. present the results of an interesting case study of a large-scale failure that occurred following an intense storm on 21 May 2016. The investigations included detailed engineering geological mapping, ground investigation and analyses to diagnose the probable causes of failure and the likelihood of further large-scale instability. The landslide occurred in difficult mountainous terrain, which presented a major challenge for the investigators. From the many important conclusions of the paper, I would like to mention that the failurewas triggered by rain-induced cleft water pressure and that a three-dimensional slope stability assessment was needed for the complex geometry. Sze et al. introduce a new type of flexible barrier in which the shape of the valley is better accounted for, resulting in more favourable geometry and greater structural effectiveness. The design and analysis of such valley-shaped barriers are presented using a state-ofthe-art analytical force approach. The authors propose lower and upper bound characteristic design curves for the energy-dissipating devices. In the paper by Yifru et al., the performance of a screen-type debris-flow countermeasure is studied in laboratory conditions. The essence of this approach is to reduce the energy of the flow by separating the water from the debris-flow. Different screen types were studied, and an optimum screen opening width identified. Finally, Ip et al. present an interesting note on the challenges encounteredwhen building an overhead line circuit in very difficult terrain, including potential landslide and rockfall areas. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the authors, reviewers, members of the HKIE Transactions Committee and the HKIE Secretariat for their time and dedication in launching this theme issue for the benefit of the engineering profession inHongKong and the rest of the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1023697X.2018.1482593\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1023697X.2018.1482593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1023697X.2018.1482593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡和泥石流对世界许多地区的人类生命和建筑环境构成严重威胁。仅在香港,从1945年到2000年,平均每年就发生约320起山体滑坡,在1970年到1980年的十年间,造成了巨大的生命损失。人口的增加已经将人类居住越来越多地推向了潜在的危险区域。即使在人口密度较低的地区,山体滑坡和泥石流也可能危及对社区至关重要的基础设施网络。气候变化导致的降水量增加可能会加速山体滑坡的发生。尽管边坡稳定性分析是岩土工程中最古老的学科之一,但人们越来越需要进行新的研究,以更好地了解滑坡和泥石流破坏的核心基本原理,从而在当今不断变化的气候条件下更准确地预测它们,并能够设计出更稳健的减灾措施。我很荣幸向《香港国际工程学报》主题期刊“滑坡和泥石流——理论与设计、缓解、稳定和监测”的读者介绍五篇关于这一主题的高质量论文和一份技术说明。Cheung等人的第一篇论文讨论了使用先进的数值分析来模拟泥石流和屏障相互作用。分析包括滑坡碎屑的流动性、柔性屏障的结构分析以及碎屑对柔性屏障影响的耦合分析。数值模型已经针对实际滑坡和冲击试验进行了验证,并取得了良好的成功。Kwan等人的文章对许多关于刚性和柔性屏障设计技术进步的研究进行了非常有益的总结。读者可以获得有用的研究,例如,关于缓冲材料减少刚性屏障动态冲击的性能,或者当水流穿过屏障时柔性屏障可用性的重要方面。Lo等人介绍了2016年5月21日强烈风暴后发生的大规模故障的有趣案例研究结果。调查包括详细的工程地质测绘、地面调查和分析,以诊断故障的可能原因和进一步大规模失稳的可能性。滑坡发生在困难的山区,这给调查人员带来了重大挑战。从论文的许多重要结论中,我想提到的是,破坏是由降雨引起的裂隙水压引发的,对于复杂的几何形状,需要进行三维边坡稳定性评估。Sze等人介绍了一种新型的柔性屏障,其中山谷的形状得到了更好的考虑,从而产生了更有利的几何形状和更大的结构有效性。采用最先进的分析力方法介绍了这种山谷形护栏的设计和分析。作者提出了耗能装置的特性设计曲线的下限和上限。在Yifru等人的论文中,在实验室条件下研究了筛网式泥石流对策的性能。这种方法的本质是通过将水从泥石流中分离来减少水流的能量。研究了不同的筛网类型,确定了最佳筛网开口宽度。最后,Ip等人对在非常困难的地形(包括潜在的滑坡和落石区域)中建造架空线路电路所面临的挑战提出了有趣的说明。我衷心感谢作者、审稿人、香港工程师学会交易委员会成员和香港工程师学会秘书处,感谢他们为香港和世界各地的工程界的利益,花时间和精力推出这期主题刊物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foreword
Landslides and debris flows pose a serious risk to human lives and the built environment in many parts of the world. In Hong Kong alone, an average of around 320 landslides occurred each year from 1945 to 2000, with significant loss of life during the decade 1970–1980. Increasing population has pushed human habitation more and more into potential hazard areas. Even in less densely populated areas, landslides and debris flows may endanger infrastructure networks vital to the community. Increasing precipitation due to climate change is likely to accelerate the occurrence of landslides. Although slope stability analysis is one of the oldest disciplines in geotechnical engineering, there is an increasing demand for new research to better understand the core fundamentals of landslide and debris flow failures, so that we can more accurately predict them in today’s changing climate conditions and are able to design more robust hazard mitigation measures. I am honoured and delighted to introduce five high-quality papers and one technical note on this subject to the readers of the HKIE Transactions theme issue on “Landslides and Debris Flow – Theory and Design, Mitigation, Stabilisation and Monitoring”. The first paper by Cheung et al. discusses the use of advanced numerical analysis to model debris flows and barrier interaction. The analyses include landslide debris mobility, the structural analysis of flexible barriers, and coupled analysis of debris impact on a flexible barrier. Verification of the numerical models has been carried out against actual landslides and impact tests with good success. The article by Kwan et al. presents a very helpful summary of the many research studies concerning technical advancements in the design of both rigid and flexible barriers. The reader can pick up helpful studies, for example, on the performance of cushioning materials for reducing dynamic impact on rigid barriers, or the important aspect of serviceability of flexible barriers when a stream crosses the barrier. Lo et al. present the results of an interesting case study of a large-scale failure that occurred following an intense storm on 21 May 2016. The investigations included detailed engineering geological mapping, ground investigation and analyses to diagnose the probable causes of failure and the likelihood of further large-scale instability. The landslide occurred in difficult mountainous terrain, which presented a major challenge for the investigators. From the many important conclusions of the paper, I would like to mention that the failurewas triggered by rain-induced cleft water pressure and that a three-dimensional slope stability assessment was needed for the complex geometry. Sze et al. introduce a new type of flexible barrier in which the shape of the valley is better accounted for, resulting in more favourable geometry and greater structural effectiveness. The design and analysis of such valley-shaped barriers are presented using a state-ofthe-art analytical force approach. The authors propose lower and upper bound characteristic design curves for the energy-dissipating devices. In the paper by Yifru et al., the performance of a screen-type debris-flow countermeasure is studied in laboratory conditions. The essence of this approach is to reduce the energy of the flow by separating the water from the debris-flow. Different screen types were studied, and an optimum screen opening width identified. Finally, Ip et al. present an interesting note on the challenges encounteredwhen building an overhead line circuit in very difficult terrain, including potential landslide and rockfall areas. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the authors, reviewers, members of the HKIE Transactions Committee and the HKIE Secretariat for their time and dedication in launching this theme issue for the benefit of the engineering profession inHongKong and the rest of the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信