高校图书馆编目成本的概念化途径:元数据创造成本、价值与价值论

IF 0.3 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
H. Sandy, Hyerim Cho, F. Dykas
{"title":"高校图书馆编目成本的概念化途径:元数据创造成本、价值与价值论","authors":"H. Sandy, Hyerim Cho, F. Dykas","doi":"10.1353/lib.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Cost analyses are ways in which individual libraries can generate information about how their budgets are used, and can possibly help demonstrate the worth and value of work in catalog and metadata creation in academic libraries. However, despite their acceptance in the professional literature, cost analyses may be deeply flawed. This article begins with a broad survey of the professional and scholarly literature focusing on cost analysis and the elements composing it. The nature of cost analysis and the goals of costing practices, including the potential to calculate a return on investment (ROI), are presented. Next, through an analysis of the recent (2000–2019) scholarly literature on costing cataloging and metadata creation in academic libraries, we present peer-reviewed literature relating to costs; we demonstrate that the scholarly literature diverges from a focus on cost analysis to focus instead on improvements to individual aspects of cataloging and metadata creation work. In the final section, we propose approaching the catalog as a service that can be assessed in terms of opportunity costs for failed interactions. Overall findings suggest that focusing on user needs can be a productive alternative approach to considering the value and worth of academic library catalog and metadata creation.","PeriodicalId":47175,"journal":{"name":"Library Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to Conceptualizing the Cost of Academic Library Cataloging: Discourses on Metadata Creation Cost, Value, and Worth\",\"authors\":\"H. Sandy, Hyerim Cho, F. Dykas\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/lib.2022.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Cost analyses are ways in which individual libraries can generate information about how their budgets are used, and can possibly help demonstrate the worth and value of work in catalog and metadata creation in academic libraries. However, despite their acceptance in the professional literature, cost analyses may be deeply flawed. This article begins with a broad survey of the professional and scholarly literature focusing on cost analysis and the elements composing it. The nature of cost analysis and the goals of costing practices, including the potential to calculate a return on investment (ROI), are presented. Next, through an analysis of the recent (2000–2019) scholarly literature on costing cataloging and metadata creation in academic libraries, we present peer-reviewed literature relating to costs; we demonstrate that the scholarly literature diverges from a focus on cost analysis to focus instead on improvements to individual aspects of cataloging and metadata creation work. In the final section, we propose approaching the catalog as a service that can be assessed in terms of opportunity costs for failed interactions. Overall findings suggest that focusing on user needs can be a productive alternative approach to considering the value and worth of academic library catalog and metadata creation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library Trends\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2022.0001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Trends","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2022.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:成本分析是单个图书馆获取预算使用信息的一种方式,它可能有助于展示学术图书馆目录和元数据创建工作的价值。然而,尽管在专业文献中被接受,成本分析可能存在严重缺陷。本文首先对专业和学术文献进行了广泛的调查,重点是成本分析及其构成要素。介绍了成本分析的性质和成本计算实践的目标,包括计算投资回报率(ROI)的潜力。接下来,通过对最近(2000-2019年)关于学术图书馆成本编目和元数据创建的学术文献的分析,我们提出了与成本相关的同行评审文献;我们证明了学术文献偏离了对成本分析的关注,转而关注对编目和元数据创建工作的各个方面的改进。在最后一部分中,我们建议将目录作为一种服务来处理,这种服务可以根据失败交互的机会成本进行评估。总体研究结果表明,关注用户需求是考虑学术图书馆目录和元数据创建的价值和价值的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches to Conceptualizing the Cost of Academic Library Cataloging: Discourses on Metadata Creation Cost, Value, and Worth
Abstract:Cost analyses are ways in which individual libraries can generate information about how their budgets are used, and can possibly help demonstrate the worth and value of work in catalog and metadata creation in academic libraries. However, despite their acceptance in the professional literature, cost analyses may be deeply flawed. This article begins with a broad survey of the professional and scholarly literature focusing on cost analysis and the elements composing it. The nature of cost analysis and the goals of costing practices, including the potential to calculate a return on investment (ROI), are presented. Next, through an analysis of the recent (2000–2019) scholarly literature on costing cataloging and metadata creation in academic libraries, we present peer-reviewed literature relating to costs; we demonstrate that the scholarly literature diverges from a focus on cost analysis to focus instead on improvements to individual aspects of cataloging and metadata creation work. In the final section, we propose approaching the catalog as a service that can be assessed in terms of opportunity costs for failed interactions. Overall findings suggest that focusing on user needs can be a productive alternative approach to considering the value and worth of academic library catalog and metadata creation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Library Trends
Library Trends INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library Trends, issued quarterly and edited by F. W. Lancaster, explores critical trends in professional librarianship, including practical applications, thorough analyses, and literature reviews. Both practicing librarians and educators use Library Trends as an essential tool in their professional development and continuing education. Each issue is devoted to a single aspect of professional activity or interest. In-depth, thoughtful articles explore important facets of the issue topic. Every year, Library Trends provides breadth, covering a wide variety of themes, from special libraries to emerging technologies. An invaluable resource to practicing librarians and educators, the journal is an important tool that is utilized for professional development and continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信