{"title":"塞舌尔的移徙工人:根据《移徙工人公约》第54(2)条解决与工作有关的争端的机制","authors":"J. D. Mujuzi","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/12652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the Seychelles Ministry of Employment, as of July 2022, twenty-five per cent of the workforce in Seychelles were migrant workers. In December 1994, Seychelles acceded to the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (the Convention). Article 54(2) of the Convention provides that ‘[i]f a migrant worker claims that the terms of his or her work contract have been violated by his or her employer, he or she shall have the right to address his or her case to the competent authorities of the State of employment.’ In 2008, the Seychelles Employment Act (the Act) was amended to establish the Employment Tribunal (the Tribunal) with exclusive jurisdiction over labour matters. Before an employer or worker lodges a grievance before the Tribunal, he/she is required to first attempt mediation before a competent officer in the Ministry of Employment. The Act includes specific provisions applicable to non-Seychellois workers. In this article, the author read the cases decided by the Tribunal between 2008 and September 2022 to establish how it has protected the rights of migrant workers. The author also assesses the mediation provisions under the Act—before competent officers. The findings show that the Tribunal’s approach substantially complies with Article 54(2) of the Convention. The author also illustrates the extent to which Seychelles complies with Articles 1(2), 25, 26, 32, 37, 43(3) 66(2) and 68 of the Convention. However, where necessary, the author suggests ways in which the rights of migrant workers can be better protected. Although there have been a few reported cases of irregular foreign workers in Seychelles, this article is limited to the protection of the rights of regular migrant workers. This is so because the author could not find a case in which the Tribunal or the competent officer dealt with the rights of irregular foreign workers. However, based on the drafting history of the Convention, it is argued that it applies to both regular and irregular workers.","PeriodicalId":29899,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Migrant Workers in Seychelles: The Mechanisms in Place to Address Their Work-Related Disputes in the Light of Article 54(2) of the Convention on Migrant Workers\",\"authors\":\"J. D. Mujuzi\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/2522-3062/12652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the Seychelles Ministry of Employment, as of July 2022, twenty-five per cent of the workforce in Seychelles were migrant workers. In December 1994, Seychelles acceded to the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (the Convention). Article 54(2) of the Convention provides that ‘[i]f a migrant worker claims that the terms of his or her work contract have been violated by his or her employer, he or she shall have the right to address his or her case to the competent authorities of the State of employment.’ In 2008, the Seychelles Employment Act (the Act) was amended to establish the Employment Tribunal (the Tribunal) with exclusive jurisdiction over labour matters. Before an employer or worker lodges a grievance before the Tribunal, he/she is required to first attempt mediation before a competent officer in the Ministry of Employment. The Act includes specific provisions applicable to non-Seychellois workers. In this article, the author read the cases decided by the Tribunal between 2008 and September 2022 to establish how it has protected the rights of migrant workers. The author also assesses the mediation provisions under the Act—before competent officers. The findings show that the Tribunal’s approach substantially complies with Article 54(2) of the Convention. The author also illustrates the extent to which Seychelles complies with Articles 1(2), 25, 26, 32, 37, 43(3) 66(2) and 68 of the Convention. However, where necessary, the author suggests ways in which the rights of migrant workers can be better protected. Although there have been a few reported cases of irregular foreign workers in Seychelles, this article is limited to the protection of the rights of regular migrant workers. This is so because the author could not find a case in which the Tribunal or the competent officer dealt with the rights of irregular foreign workers. However, based on the drafting history of the Convention, it is argued that it applies to both regular and irregular workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/12652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/12652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Migrant Workers in Seychelles: The Mechanisms in Place to Address Their Work-Related Disputes in the Light of Article 54(2) of the Convention on Migrant Workers
According to the Seychelles Ministry of Employment, as of July 2022, twenty-five per cent of the workforce in Seychelles were migrant workers. In December 1994, Seychelles acceded to the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (the Convention). Article 54(2) of the Convention provides that ‘[i]f a migrant worker claims that the terms of his or her work contract have been violated by his or her employer, he or she shall have the right to address his or her case to the competent authorities of the State of employment.’ In 2008, the Seychelles Employment Act (the Act) was amended to establish the Employment Tribunal (the Tribunal) with exclusive jurisdiction over labour matters. Before an employer or worker lodges a grievance before the Tribunal, he/she is required to first attempt mediation before a competent officer in the Ministry of Employment. The Act includes specific provisions applicable to non-Seychellois workers. In this article, the author read the cases decided by the Tribunal between 2008 and September 2022 to establish how it has protected the rights of migrant workers. The author also assesses the mediation provisions under the Act—before competent officers. The findings show that the Tribunal’s approach substantially complies with Article 54(2) of the Convention. The author also illustrates the extent to which Seychelles complies with Articles 1(2), 25, 26, 32, 37, 43(3) 66(2) and 68 of the Convention. However, where necessary, the author suggests ways in which the rights of migrant workers can be better protected. Although there have been a few reported cases of irregular foreign workers in Seychelles, this article is limited to the protection of the rights of regular migrant workers. This is so because the author could not find a case in which the Tribunal or the competent officer dealt with the rights of irregular foreign workers. However, based on the drafting history of the Convention, it is argued that it applies to both regular and irregular workers.