{"title":"地理上的撤退和象征性的前进?","authors":"J. Coakley","doi":"10.1075/lplp.00079.coa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Language policy in the Republic of Ireland has an unusual starting point: the geographical base of the Irish\n language is very weak and territorially dispersed, yet the constitutional status of the language is extremely strong. The article\n explores this paradox. It sets Irish language policy in two contexts: that of successful nationalist movements mainly in Central\n and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century, and that of the struggling Celtic languages of Western Europe. It explores the\n evolution of the language and its weakening demographic status since the nineteenth century, noting that while its demographic\n weakness mirrors that of the other Celtic languages, its constitutional entrenchment resembles that of the national languages of\n Central and East European states. It attempts to explain this by suggesting that the language has played a marginal role in\n nationalist mobilisation; the language served as a symbol of a specific cultural heritage rather than as the vital lingua franca\n of the community. The central role of the language in nationalist ideology, however, failed to address the reality of continuing\n decline in the Irish-speaking districts, notwithstanding the emergence of a sizeable population of ‘new speakers’ of the language\n outside these districts.","PeriodicalId":44345,"journal":{"name":"Language Problems & Language Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographical retreat and symbolic advance?\",\"authors\":\"J. Coakley\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lplp.00079.coa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Language policy in the Republic of Ireland has an unusual starting point: the geographical base of the Irish\\n language is very weak and territorially dispersed, yet the constitutional status of the language is extremely strong. The article\\n explores this paradox. It sets Irish language policy in two contexts: that of successful nationalist movements mainly in Central\\n and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century, and that of the struggling Celtic languages of Western Europe. It explores the\\n evolution of the language and its weakening demographic status since the nineteenth century, noting that while its demographic\\n weakness mirrors that of the other Celtic languages, its constitutional entrenchment resembles that of the national languages of\\n Central and East European states. It attempts to explain this by suggesting that the language has played a marginal role in\\n nationalist mobilisation; the language served as a symbol of a specific cultural heritage rather than as the vital lingua franca\\n of the community. The central role of the language in nationalist ideology, however, failed to address the reality of continuing\\n decline in the Irish-speaking districts, notwithstanding the emergence of a sizeable population of ‘new speakers’ of the language\\n outside these districts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00079.coa\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Problems & Language Planning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00079.coa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Language policy in the Republic of Ireland has an unusual starting point: the geographical base of the Irish
language is very weak and territorially dispersed, yet the constitutional status of the language is extremely strong. The article
explores this paradox. It sets Irish language policy in two contexts: that of successful nationalist movements mainly in Central
and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century, and that of the struggling Celtic languages of Western Europe. It explores the
evolution of the language and its weakening demographic status since the nineteenth century, noting that while its demographic
weakness mirrors that of the other Celtic languages, its constitutional entrenchment resembles that of the national languages of
Central and East European states. It attempts to explain this by suggesting that the language has played a marginal role in
nationalist mobilisation; the language served as a symbol of a specific cultural heritage rather than as the vital lingua franca
of the community. The central role of the language in nationalist ideology, however, failed to address the reality of continuing
decline in the Irish-speaking districts, notwithstanding the emergence of a sizeable population of ‘new speakers’ of the language
outside these districts.
期刊介绍:
Language Problems and Language Planning is published in cooperation with the Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems. This international multi-lingual journal publishes articles primarily on political, sociological, and economic aspects of language and language use. It is especially concerned with relationships between and among language communities, particularly in international contexts, and in the adaptation, manipulation, and standardization of language for international use.