骄傲、贪婪与虚伪:詹姆斯·乔伊斯从《格蕾丝》到《姐妹》的Gnomonologies

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Kwan Lok Cheung
{"title":"骄傲、贪婪与虚伪:詹姆斯·乔伊斯从《格蕾丝》到《姐妹》的Gnomonologies","authors":"Kwan Lok Cheung","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:\"[G]nomon,\" one of the three italicized words James Joyce substituted for \"Providence\" in rewriting \"The Sisters\" as the introductory chapter of Dubliners, has engrossed readers with its implications for probing his artistic intentions, practices, and experiments. Expanding on the term's definition in geometry, interpretations of \"gnomon\" have informed approaches to his epicleti with highlights of thematic embodiments, textual gaps, and structural arrangements. Parallelism on an intertextual level, however, remains an underexplored perspective. Explanations of the enigmas in \"The Sisters,\" I argue, are encrypted within the textual hiatuses in \"Grace.\" Upon replenishment of the narrative gaps in both stories, it becomes clear that Thomas Kernan and Father Purdon mirror the boy-narrator and Father Flynn in the unfolding of their simoniac schemes. Moments that disclose consciousness point to \"pride\" and \"covetousness,\" two capital sins in Catholic doctrines, as the roots of their moral-spiritual paralysis and make the hypocrisy in their instrumental appropriation of religion explicit. The absent corner of gnomon represents not only the consciousness-revealing textual apertures but also the inner voids Dubliners with a paralytic conscience scheme to mask. With \"The Sisters\" and \"Grace\" offering projections of Joyce's most prototypical specimens, \"gnomon\" fits into the italicized triad as a trope for the vantage points required to perceive \"paralysis,\" \"simony,\" and \"Providence\" through the anamorphosis of his \"nicely polished looking-glass.\"","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pride, Covetousness, and Hypocrisy: James Joyce's Gnomonologies from \\\"Grace\\\" to \\\"The Sisters\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Kwan Lok Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jjq.2022.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:\\\"[G]nomon,\\\" one of the three italicized words James Joyce substituted for \\\"Providence\\\" in rewriting \\\"The Sisters\\\" as the introductory chapter of Dubliners, has engrossed readers with its implications for probing his artistic intentions, practices, and experiments. Expanding on the term's definition in geometry, interpretations of \\\"gnomon\\\" have informed approaches to his epicleti with highlights of thematic embodiments, textual gaps, and structural arrangements. Parallelism on an intertextual level, however, remains an underexplored perspective. Explanations of the enigmas in \\\"The Sisters,\\\" I argue, are encrypted within the textual hiatuses in \\\"Grace.\\\" Upon replenishment of the narrative gaps in both stories, it becomes clear that Thomas Kernan and Father Purdon mirror the boy-narrator and Father Flynn in the unfolding of their simoniac schemes. Moments that disclose consciousness point to \\\"pride\\\" and \\\"covetousness,\\\" two capital sins in Catholic doctrines, as the roots of their moral-spiritual paralysis and make the hypocrisy in their instrumental appropriation of religion explicit. The absent corner of gnomon represents not only the consciousness-revealing textual apertures but also the inner voids Dubliners with a paralytic conscience scheme to mask. With \\\"The Sisters\\\" and \\\"Grace\\\" offering projections of Joyce's most prototypical specimens, \\\"gnomon\\\" fits into the italicized triad as a trope for the vantage points required to perceive \\\"paralysis,\\\" \\\"simony,\\\" and \\\"Providence\\\" through the anamorphosis of his \\\"nicely polished looking-glass.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":42413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.0027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:詹姆斯·乔伊斯在《都柏林人》的引言部分改写《姐妹》时,将“普罗维登斯”(Providence)替换为三个斜体词之一的“nomon”,吸引了读者对其艺术意图、实践和实验的探索。在几何学中扩展了这个术语的定义,对“gnomon”的解释通过强调主题体现、文本空白和结构安排,为他的epicleti提供了信息。然而,互文水平上的并行性仍然是一个未充分探索的观点。我认为,对《姐妹》中谜题的解释,在《恩典》的文本空白中被加密了。在补充了两个故事的叙述空白之后,很明显,托马斯·克南和珀顿神父在展开他们的西蒙尼计划时,反映了男孩叙述者和弗林神父。揭露意识的时刻指向“骄傲”和“贪婪”,这是天主教教义中的两大罪,是他们道德-精神瘫痪的根源,并使他们对宗教的工具挪用变得虚伪。罗盘的缺失一角不仅代表了揭示意识的文本缝隙,也代表了都柏林人用麻痹的良心计划来掩盖的内心空虚。《姐妹》和《格蕾丝》提供了乔伊斯最典型的样本的投影,“gnomon”符合斜体字的三位一体,作为一种修辞,通过他“精心打磨的镜子”的变形来感知“麻痹”、“圣神”和“天意”所需的有利位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pride, Covetousness, and Hypocrisy: James Joyce's Gnomonologies from "Grace" to "The Sisters"
Abstract:"[G]nomon," one of the three italicized words James Joyce substituted for "Providence" in rewriting "The Sisters" as the introductory chapter of Dubliners, has engrossed readers with its implications for probing his artistic intentions, practices, and experiments. Expanding on the term's definition in geometry, interpretations of "gnomon" have informed approaches to his epicleti with highlights of thematic embodiments, textual gaps, and structural arrangements. Parallelism on an intertextual level, however, remains an underexplored perspective. Explanations of the enigmas in "The Sisters," I argue, are encrypted within the textual hiatuses in "Grace." Upon replenishment of the narrative gaps in both stories, it becomes clear that Thomas Kernan and Father Purdon mirror the boy-narrator and Father Flynn in the unfolding of their simoniac schemes. Moments that disclose consciousness point to "pride" and "covetousness," two capital sins in Catholic doctrines, as the roots of their moral-spiritual paralysis and make the hypocrisy in their instrumental appropriation of religion explicit. The absent corner of gnomon represents not only the consciousness-revealing textual apertures but also the inner voids Dubliners with a paralytic conscience scheme to mask. With "The Sisters" and "Grace" offering projections of Joyce's most prototypical specimens, "gnomon" fits into the italicized triad as a trope for the vantage points required to perceive "paralysis," "simony," and "Providence" through the anamorphosis of his "nicely polished looking-glass."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信