{"title":"白银时代女性抒情作品的创作隐喻与主体性问题","authors":"Екатерина В. Кузнецова (E.V. Kuznetsova)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Focusing on the problems of female authorship, this article considers how the “I” of the author is expressed in the works of Z. Gippius, E. Dmitrieva, A. Gertsyk and T. Shchepkina-Kupernik in the context of the gender revolution of the late XIX – early XX centuries. This increased the scope of women’s opportunities but was still a very painful process. Constrained by gender role traditionalism, female writers’ authorial subjectivity was called into question. The article examines these poets’ narrative strategies and the emergence in resistance to dominant androcentric practices of a dual female style or voice, identified in analysis of metalyric texts containing <em>metaphors of women’s needlework</em>: images of spinning, sewing and weaving wreaths that encode the creative process of the female subject. Zinaida Gippius’ lyrics reveal the hidden female subject. Gertsyk (articulating passivity but hinting at a special relationship with the Higher Principle) and Dmitrieva (problematizing female authorship as a threatening act but emphasizing her heroine’s favorites) experiment with an ultra-feminine mode of poetic utterance. Even Shchepkina-Kupernik, whose poems do not stray beyond the traditional “women's circle”, uses gender role stereotypes to mask the true content and the addressee of her lyrics, as her own biography suggests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Метафоры рукоделия и проблематика субъектности в женской лирике Серебряного века\",\"authors\":\"Екатерина В. Кузнецова (E.V. Kuznetsova)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Focusing on the problems of female authorship, this article considers how the “I” of the author is expressed in the works of Z. Gippius, E. Dmitrieva, A. Gertsyk and T. Shchepkina-Kupernik in the context of the gender revolution of the late XIX – early XX centuries. This increased the scope of women’s opportunities but was still a very painful process. Constrained by gender role traditionalism, female writers’ authorial subjectivity was called into question. The article examines these poets’ narrative strategies and the emergence in resistance to dominant androcentric practices of a dual female style or voice, identified in analysis of metalyric texts containing <em>metaphors of women’s needlework</em>: images of spinning, sewing and weaving wreaths that encode the creative process of the female subject. Zinaida Gippius’ lyrics reveal the hidden female subject. Gertsyk (articulating passivity but hinting at a special relationship with the Higher Principle) and Dmitrieva (problematizing female authorship as a threatening act but emphasizing her heroine’s favorites) experiment with an ultra-feminine mode of poetic utterance. Even Shchepkina-Kupernik, whose poems do not stray beyond the traditional “women's circle”, uses gender role stereotypes to mask the true content and the addressee of her lyrics, as her own biography suggests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030434792200014X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030434792200014X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Метафоры рукоделия и проблематика субъектности в женской лирике Серебряного века
Focusing on the problems of female authorship, this article considers how the “I” of the author is expressed in the works of Z. Gippius, E. Dmitrieva, A. Gertsyk and T. Shchepkina-Kupernik in the context of the gender revolution of the late XIX – early XX centuries. This increased the scope of women’s opportunities but was still a very painful process. Constrained by gender role traditionalism, female writers’ authorial subjectivity was called into question. The article examines these poets’ narrative strategies and the emergence in resistance to dominant androcentric practices of a dual female style or voice, identified in analysis of metalyric texts containing metaphors of women’s needlework: images of spinning, sewing and weaving wreaths that encode the creative process of the female subject. Zinaida Gippius’ lyrics reveal the hidden female subject. Gertsyk (articulating passivity but hinting at a special relationship with the Higher Principle) and Dmitrieva (problematizing female authorship as a threatening act but emphasizing her heroine’s favorites) experiment with an ultra-feminine mode of poetic utterance. Even Shchepkina-Kupernik, whose poems do not stray beyond the traditional “women's circle”, uses gender role stereotypes to mask the true content and the addressee of her lyrics, as her own biography suggests.
期刊介绍:
Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.