房地产作为盗窃主体的社会历史分析

A. Maksurov
{"title":"房地产作为盗窃主体的社会历史分析","authors":"A. Maksurov","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-1-64-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the actual problems of classifying real estate as objects of theft and, above all, fraud. The importance of solving this kind of issue from the standpoint of the history of legal regulation is determined, the socio-economic significance of real estate in modern society is shown. The conclusion is made about the change in the social essence of real estate during the historical development, which influenced the legal regulation of the protection of rights to real estate, including the norms of criminal law. The prerequisites and possibilities of the historical and legal approach in this part are considered. Characteristics are given to the main trends in the development of legal understanding about real estate as an object of criminal encroachment and, first of all, theft. The author came to the conclusion that such development is largely due to a change in the content characteristics of the right to real estate, on the one hand, and a clarification of the place of ownership in the system of other rights to real estate, on the other. In addition, the concept of fraud as a type of criminal behavior has historically changed. The paper identifies priorities in the area under study of the post-revolutionary period, which did not hasten to take full advantage of the previous historical experience and offered its own vision of the issue. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were drawn about the opportunities for improving the legislation on criminal liability for theft of real estate provides the genesis of Russian law.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real Estate as a Subject of Theft: a Socio-Historical Analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Maksurov\",\"doi\":\"10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-1-64-76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the actual problems of classifying real estate as objects of theft and, above all, fraud. The importance of solving this kind of issue from the standpoint of the history of legal regulation is determined, the socio-economic significance of real estate in modern society is shown. The conclusion is made about the change in the social essence of real estate during the historical development, which influenced the legal regulation of the protection of rights to real estate, including the norms of criminal law. The prerequisites and possibilities of the historical and legal approach in this part are considered. Characteristics are given to the main trends in the development of legal understanding about real estate as an object of criminal encroachment and, first of all, theft. The author came to the conclusion that such development is largely due to a change in the content characteristics of the right to real estate, on the one hand, and a clarification of the place of ownership in the system of other rights to real estate, on the other. In addition, the concept of fraud as a type of criminal behavior has historically changed. The paper identifies priorities in the area under study of the post-revolutionary period, which did not hasten to take full advantage of the previous historical experience and offered its own vision of the issue. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were drawn about the opportunities for improving the legislation on criminal liability for theft of real estate provides the genesis of Russian law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-1-64-76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-1-64-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了将房地产归类为盗窃对象,尤其是欺诈对象的实际问题。从法律规制史的角度确定了解决这类问题的重要性,表明了房地产在现代社会中的社会经济意义。结论是在历史发展过程中,房地产的社会本质发生了变化,影响了房地产权利保护的法律规范,包括刑法规范。这一部分考虑了历史和法律方法的先决条件和可能性。将房地产作为犯罪侵占的对象,首先是盗窃,给出了法律理解的主要发展趋势。作者得出的结论是,这种发展很大程度上是由于不动产权利的内容特征发生了变化,另一方面是不动产其他权利体系中所有权归属地的明确。此外,欺诈作为一种犯罪行为的概念也发生了历史性的变化。本文确定了后革命时期研究领域的优先事项,后革命时期没有迅速充分利用以前的历史经验,并提出了自己对这一问题的看法。根据研究结果,得出了关于改进盗窃房地产刑事责任立法的机会的结论,为俄罗斯法律的起源提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real Estate as a Subject of Theft: a Socio-Historical Analysis
The article deals with the actual problems of classifying real estate as objects of theft and, above all, fraud. The importance of solving this kind of issue from the standpoint of the history of legal regulation is determined, the socio-economic significance of real estate in modern society is shown. The conclusion is made about the change in the social essence of real estate during the historical development, which influenced the legal regulation of the protection of rights to real estate, including the norms of criminal law. The prerequisites and possibilities of the historical and legal approach in this part are considered. Characteristics are given to the main trends in the development of legal understanding about real estate as an object of criminal encroachment and, first of all, theft. The author came to the conclusion that such development is largely due to a change in the content characteristics of the right to real estate, on the one hand, and a clarification of the place of ownership in the system of other rights to real estate, on the other. In addition, the concept of fraud as a type of criminal behavior has historically changed. The paper identifies priorities in the area under study of the post-revolutionary period, which did not hasten to take full advantage of the previous historical experience and offered its own vision of the issue. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were drawn about the opportunities for improving the legislation on criminal liability for theft of real estate provides the genesis of Russian law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信