中国在中东的三级博弈

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES
G. Burton
{"title":"中国在中东的三级博弈","authors":"G. Burton","doi":"10.1080/25765949.2021.1928412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How has China responded to regional tensions and conflicts in the Middle East? Broadly, it has done so in the form of a three-level game, at the global level (involving powerful outside parties like the US, Russia and the Europeans), at the regional level (and specifically the main regional powers like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel and Turkey) and at the sub-regional level where smaller and weaker states are based. The existence of this multipolar and competitive environment in which no one state or group of states is sufficiently capable to overcome another means that China’s relations with the region involve a range of sometimes contrary responses, including cooperation with these states while avoiding being caught up in their differences. This strategy may be summarised as ‘strategic ambiguity’ or ‘hedging’ and while it has served China well, it may be reaching the endpoint of its current utility.","PeriodicalId":29909,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"189 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25765949.2021.1928412","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Three Level Game in the Middle East\",\"authors\":\"G. Burton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25765949.2021.1928412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract How has China responded to regional tensions and conflicts in the Middle East? Broadly, it has done so in the form of a three-level game, at the global level (involving powerful outside parties like the US, Russia and the Europeans), at the regional level (and specifically the main regional powers like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel and Turkey) and at the sub-regional level where smaller and weaker states are based. The existence of this multipolar and competitive environment in which no one state or group of states is sufficiently capable to overcome another means that China’s relations with the region involve a range of sometimes contrary responses, including cooperation with these states while avoiding being caught up in their differences. This strategy may be summarised as ‘strategic ambiguity’ or ‘hedging’ and while it has served China well, it may be reaching the endpoint of its current utility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"189 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25765949.2021.1928412\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2021.1928412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2021.1928412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要中国如何应对中东地区的紧张局势和冲突?总的来说,它是以三级游戏的形式做到这一点的,在全球层面(包括美国、俄罗斯和欧洲等强大的外部政党),在地区层面(特别是沙特阿拉伯、伊朗、以色列和土耳其等主要地区大国),以及在较小和较弱国家所在的次区域层面。这种多极竞争环境的存在意味着,中国与该地区的关系涉及一系列有时相反的反应,包括与这些国家合作,同时避免陷入分歧。这种策略可以概括为“战略模糊”或“对冲”,尽管它对中国很有帮助,但它可能正在达到其当前效用的终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
China’s Three Level Game in the Middle East
Abstract How has China responded to regional tensions and conflicts in the Middle East? Broadly, it has done so in the form of a three-level game, at the global level (involving powerful outside parties like the US, Russia and the Europeans), at the regional level (and specifically the main regional powers like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel and Turkey) and at the sub-regional level where smaller and weaker states are based. The existence of this multipolar and competitive environment in which no one state or group of states is sufficiently capable to overcome another means that China’s relations with the region involve a range of sometimes contrary responses, including cooperation with these states while avoiding being caught up in their differences. This strategy may be summarised as ‘strategic ambiguity’ or ‘hedging’ and while it has served China well, it may be reaching the endpoint of its current utility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信