元伦理学史再探——以艾尔的情感主义为例

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Anuario Filosofico Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.15581/009.54.3.005

Santiago-A. Vrech

{"title":"元伦理学史再探——以艾尔的情感主义为例","authors":"Santiago-A. Vrech","doi":"10.15581/009.54.3.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is double. In the fi rst part I argue against the traditional interpretation of Ayer’s emotivism. According to this interpretation, in Language, Truth and Logic Ayer based emotivism on his “radical empiricist” (positivist) view. I argue that this is not so. Then, in the second part I develop a new interpretation of emotivism according to which Ayer’s analysis of moral vocabulary does not depend on positivism. The purpose of the article is to contribute to the history of metaethics by presenting a correct account of Ayer’s analysis.","PeriodicalId":42698,"journal":{"name":"Anuario Filosofico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revising the History of Meta-ethics: the Case of Ayer’s Emotivism\",\"authors\":\"Santiago-A. Vrech\",\"doi\":\"10.15581/009.54.3.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is double. In the fi rst part I argue against the traditional interpretation of Ayer’s emotivism. According to this interpretation, in Language, Truth and Logic Ayer based emotivism on his “radical empiricist” (positivist) view. I argue that this is not so. Then, in the second part I develop a new interpretation of emotivism according to which Ayer’s analysis of moral vocabulary does not depend on positivism. The purpose of the article is to contribute to the history of metaethics by presenting a correct account of Ayer’s analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario Filosofico\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario Filosofico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15581/009.54.3.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario Filosofico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15581/009.54.3.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是双重的。在第一部分中，我反对对艾尔情绪主义的传统解读。根据这一解释，艾尔在《语言、真理与逻辑》一书中，以其“激进经验主义”（实证主义）观点为基础的情感主义。然后，在第二部分中，我对情绪主义进行了新的解释，根据这一解释，艾尔对道德词汇的分析并不依赖于实证主义。本文的目的是通过对艾尔分析的正确描述，为元伦理学史做出贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Revising the History of Meta-ethics: the Case of Ayer’s Emotivism

The aim of this paper is double. In the fi rst part I argue against the traditional interpretation of Ayer’s emotivism. According to this interpretation, in Language, Truth and Logic Ayer based emotivism on his “radical empiricist” (positivist) view. I argue that this is not so. Then, in the second part I develop a new interpretation of emotivism according to which Ayer’s analysis of moral vocabulary does not depend on positivism. The purpose of the article is to contribute to the history of metaethics by presenting a correct account of Ayer’s analysis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Anuario Filosofico PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Anuario Filosófico, first published in 1968, is one of the most influential philosophical journals in the Spanish-speaking world. Since its beginning, it has published the work of a significant number of both Spanish and foreign philosophers, including Jan A. Aertsen, Elizabeth Anscombe, Werner Beierwaltes, Michael Dummett, Peter Geach, Susan Haack, Friedrich Kaulbach, Ralph McInerny, Antonio Millán-Puelles, Giovanni Reale and Robert Spaemann.