排序形状还是连接点?丹麦幼儿教育全球化的地方立法

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Signe Hvid Thingstrup, Christian Aabro, Karen Prins, Kira Saabye Christensen
{"title":"排序形状还是连接点?丹麦幼儿教育全球化的地方立法","authors":"Signe Hvid Thingstrup, Christian Aabro, Karen Prins, Kira Saabye Christensen","doi":"10.1177/20436106231179604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how complex globalization processes play out in early childhood education (ECE) in Denmark. The article builds on two concepts of globalization: First, we understand globalization as the ways in which transnational educational policy discourses characterized by neoliberal pedagogical values affect national and local policies. Second, we understand globalization as ways in which cultural diversity as a product of global migration processes is discursively constructed as constituting specific “problems” for early childhood education. Drawing on the first concept of globalization, the article explores how a key policy document, The Strengthened Learning Plan (the SLP), is recontextualized and “put into action” in practice, and whether it leads to practices characterized by globalized neoliberal values at the cost of Nordic pedagogical ideals. We show that the SLP is enacted in very different ways in different centers, giving very different emphasis to globalized and Nordic ideals, respectively, and thus that the globalization of Danish ECE is by no means unambiguous. Looking more closely into the different enactments of the SLP, it becomes clear that they are closely connected to discursive constructions of the demography of the center: Constructions of ethnic minority children draw on culturalized categorizations where children are seen as vulnerable and as lacking, whereas constructions of ethnic majority children draw on non-culturalized categorizations where children are seen as natural and resourceful. Drawing on the second concept of globalization, we argue that the different enactments of early childhood policy build on connections between constructions of cultural diversity (or the lack thereof) and the construction of pedagogical “problems.” As such, the different enactments of the SLP—including those that prioritize Nordic ideals—represent globalization in the sense of constructions of cultural diversity that pose specific problems for early childhood education. Building on these findings, the article argues that the two globalization processes intersect, mutually shaping each other, and affecting how policies are enacted in pedagogical practice.","PeriodicalId":37143,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies of Childhood","volume":"13 1","pages":"261 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sorting shapes or connecting dots? Local enactments of globalization in early childhood education in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Signe Hvid Thingstrup, Christian Aabro, Karen Prins, Kira Saabye Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20436106231179604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores how complex globalization processes play out in early childhood education (ECE) in Denmark. The article builds on two concepts of globalization: First, we understand globalization as the ways in which transnational educational policy discourses characterized by neoliberal pedagogical values affect national and local policies. Second, we understand globalization as ways in which cultural diversity as a product of global migration processes is discursively constructed as constituting specific “problems” for early childhood education. Drawing on the first concept of globalization, the article explores how a key policy document, The Strengthened Learning Plan (the SLP), is recontextualized and “put into action” in practice, and whether it leads to practices characterized by globalized neoliberal values at the cost of Nordic pedagogical ideals. We show that the SLP is enacted in very different ways in different centers, giving very different emphasis to globalized and Nordic ideals, respectively, and thus that the globalization of Danish ECE is by no means unambiguous. Looking more closely into the different enactments of the SLP, it becomes clear that they are closely connected to discursive constructions of the demography of the center: Constructions of ethnic minority children draw on culturalized categorizations where children are seen as vulnerable and as lacking, whereas constructions of ethnic majority children draw on non-culturalized categorizations where children are seen as natural and resourceful. Drawing on the second concept of globalization, we argue that the different enactments of early childhood policy build on connections between constructions of cultural diversity (or the lack thereof) and the construction of pedagogical “problems.” As such, the different enactments of the SLP—including those that prioritize Nordic ideals—represent globalization in the sense of constructions of cultural diversity that pose specific problems for early childhood education. Building on these findings, the article argues that the two globalization processes intersect, mutually shaping each other, and affecting how policies are enacted in pedagogical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"261 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106231179604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies of Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106231179604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了复杂的全球化进程如何在丹麦幼儿教育中发挥作用。本文基于全球化的两个概念:首先,我们将全球化理解为以新自由主义教育价值观为特征的跨国教育政策话语影响国家和地方政策的方式。其次,我们将全球化理解为,作为全球移民过程产物的文化多样性被随意构建为幼儿教育的具体“问题”。本文借鉴全球化的第一个概念,探讨了一份关键的政策文件《强化学习计划》(SLP)是如何在实践中被重新文本化和“付诸行动”的,以及它是否以北欧教育理想为代价,导致了以全球化新自由主义价值观为特征的实践。我们表明,SLP在不同的中心以非常不同的方式制定,分别对全球化和北欧理想给予了非常不同的重视,因此丹麦欧洲经委会的全球化绝非毫不含糊。更仔细地观察SLP的不同制定,很明显,它们与中心人口统计学的话语建构密切相关:少数民族儿童的建构借鉴了文化化的分类,在这些分类中,儿童被视为脆弱和缺乏,而少数民族儿童的结构则借鉴了非文化化的分类,即儿童被视为天生和足智多谋。根据全球化的第二个概念,我们认为,幼儿政策的不同制定建立在文化多样性构建(或缺乏文化多样性)和教学“问题”构建之间的联系之上,SLP的不同法令——包括那些优先考虑北欧理想的法令——代表了文化多样性建设意义上的全球化,这给幼儿教育带来了特定的问题。基于这些发现,文章认为,这两个全球化过程是交叉的,相互影响,并影响着教育实践中政策的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sorting shapes or connecting dots? Local enactments of globalization in early childhood education in Denmark
This article explores how complex globalization processes play out in early childhood education (ECE) in Denmark. The article builds on two concepts of globalization: First, we understand globalization as the ways in which transnational educational policy discourses characterized by neoliberal pedagogical values affect national and local policies. Second, we understand globalization as ways in which cultural diversity as a product of global migration processes is discursively constructed as constituting specific “problems” for early childhood education. Drawing on the first concept of globalization, the article explores how a key policy document, The Strengthened Learning Plan (the SLP), is recontextualized and “put into action” in practice, and whether it leads to practices characterized by globalized neoliberal values at the cost of Nordic pedagogical ideals. We show that the SLP is enacted in very different ways in different centers, giving very different emphasis to globalized and Nordic ideals, respectively, and thus that the globalization of Danish ECE is by no means unambiguous. Looking more closely into the different enactments of the SLP, it becomes clear that they are closely connected to discursive constructions of the demography of the center: Constructions of ethnic minority children draw on culturalized categorizations where children are seen as vulnerable and as lacking, whereas constructions of ethnic majority children draw on non-culturalized categorizations where children are seen as natural and resourceful. Drawing on the second concept of globalization, we argue that the different enactments of early childhood policy build on connections between constructions of cultural diversity (or the lack thereof) and the construction of pedagogical “problems.” As such, the different enactments of the SLP—including those that prioritize Nordic ideals—represent globalization in the sense of constructions of cultural diversity that pose specific problems for early childhood education. Building on these findings, the article argues that the two globalization processes intersect, mutually shaping each other, and affecting how policies are enacted in pedagogical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Studies of Childhood
Global Studies of Childhood Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信