作为政府讨价还价工具的反民主威胁雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗(2019 - 2021)

Alexsander Dugno Chiodi, Ana Julia Bonzanini Bernardi
{"title":"作为政府讨价还价工具的反民主威胁雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗(2019 - 2021)","authors":"Alexsander Dugno Chiodi, Ana Julia Bonzanini Bernardi","doi":"10.26851/rucp.32.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The Bolsonaro’s government has kept conflict and democracy as a constant element in public management, as in the relationship with branches of government. In the field of Rational Choice Theory, Schelling (1980) states that bargaining is part of dissuasion, taking place in the process of influencing the choices of the other player based on the generated expectations. Thus, the research question that guides this study is: Did the Bolsonaro government use the anti‑democratic threat as a bargaining tool? In this sense, to identify the situations of bargaining, threat, and promise, we conducted a qualitative analysis, through the creation of the Bolsonaro Threat and Bargain Database, composed of 470 movements from 1.1.2019 to 9.9.2019. 2021. Preliminary conclusions indicate that Bolsonaro mobilized threat as a bargaining strategy, threatening democracy and stressing the relationship between powers throughout analyzed period.","PeriodicalId":30990,"journal":{"name":"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A ameaça antidemocrática como instrumento de barganha no governo Jair Bolsonaro (2019 2021)\",\"authors\":\"Alexsander Dugno Chiodi, Ana Julia Bonzanini Bernardi\",\"doi\":\"10.26851/rucp.32.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The Bolsonaro’s government has kept conflict and democracy as a constant element in public management, as in the relationship with branches of government. In the field of Rational Choice Theory, Schelling (1980) states that bargaining is part of dissuasion, taking place in the process of influencing the choices of the other player based on the generated expectations. Thus, the research question that guides this study is: Did the Bolsonaro government use the anti‑democratic threat as a bargaining tool? In this sense, to identify the situations of bargaining, threat, and promise, we conducted a qualitative analysis, through the creation of the Bolsonaro Threat and Bargain Database, composed of 470 movements from 1.1.2019 to 9.9.2019. 2021. Preliminary conclusions indicate that Bolsonaro mobilized threat as a bargaining strategy, threatening democracy and stressing the relationship between powers throughout analyzed period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26851/rucp.32.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26851/rucp.32.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

博索纳罗政府一直将冲突和民主作为公共管理的一个不变因素,就像与政府部门的关系一样。在理性选择理论领域,谢林(1980)指出,讨价还价是劝阻的一部分,发生在基于产生的期望影响对方选择的过程中。因此,指导本研究的研究问题是:博尔索纳罗政府是否将反民主威胁作为讨价还价的工具?从这个意义上说,为了确定讨价还价、威胁和承诺的情况,我们通过创建博索纳罗威胁和讨价还价数据库进行了定性分析,该数据库由2019年1月1日至2019年9月9日的470次运动组成。2021. 初步结论表明,博尔索纳罗在分析期间将威胁作为一种谈判策略,威胁民主并强调权力之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A ameaça antidemocrática como instrumento de barganha no governo Jair Bolsonaro (2019 2021)
: The Bolsonaro’s government has kept conflict and democracy as a constant element in public management, as in the relationship with branches of government. In the field of Rational Choice Theory, Schelling (1980) states that bargaining is part of dissuasion, taking place in the process of influencing the choices of the other player based on the generated expectations. Thus, the research question that guides this study is: Did the Bolsonaro government use the anti‑democratic threat as a bargaining tool? In this sense, to identify the situations of bargaining, threat, and promise, we conducted a qualitative analysis, through the creation of the Bolsonaro Threat and Bargain Database, composed of 470 movements from 1.1.2019 to 9.9.2019. 2021. Preliminary conclusions indicate that Bolsonaro mobilized threat as a bargaining strategy, threatening democracy and stressing the relationship between powers throughout analyzed period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信