詹姆斯国王无聊的再思考：表演与前现代史

IF 0.4 2区历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES

JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1215/10829636-9295030

D. Hopkins

{"title":"詹姆斯国王无聊的再思考：表演与前现代史","authors":"D. Hopkins","doi":"10.1215/10829636-9295030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The royal entry of King James I into London in 1604 serves as an opportunity to reconsider the relationship between public, urban performance and the primary sources that ostensibly document it. The author revisits his own past study of this occasion, revising and expanding previous conclusions about early modern English performance in light of new research and theory. The article deploys new thinking about performance historiography, arguing that such perspectives unsettle the easy placement of an event in historical chronology, disrupt archival logic, and insist on a degree of historiographical ambiguity. The legacy of new historicism is considered in tandem with current theories of performance history, and a hybridization of new historicism and performance theory is considered in relation to historiographic practice.","PeriodicalId":51901,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering the Boredom of King James: Performance and Premodern Histories\",\"authors\":\"D. Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/10829636-9295030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The royal entry of King James I into London in 1604 serves as an opportunity to reconsider the relationship between public, urban performance and the primary sources that ostensibly document it. The author revisits his own past study of this occasion, revising and expanding previous conclusions about early modern English performance in light of new research and theory. The article deploys new thinking about performance historiography, arguing that such perspectives unsettle the easy placement of an event in historical chronology, disrupt archival logic, and insist on a degree of historiographical ambiguity. The legacy of new historicism is considered in tandem with current theories of performance history, and a hybridization of new historicism and performance theory is considered in relation to historiographic practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-9295030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-9295030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

1604年，英国国王詹姆斯一世（King James I）正式进入伦敦，这为我们提供了一个重新思考公共、城市表演与表面上记录它的主要来源之间关系的机会。作者回顾了自己过去对这一场合的研究，并根据新的研究和理论对先前关于早期现代英语表演的结论进行了修订和扩展。文章对表演史学进行了新的思考，认为这种观点扰乱了事件在历史年表中的容易位置，扰乱了档案逻辑，并坚持一定程度的历史模糊性。新历史主义的遗产与当前的表演史理论相结合，新历史主义和表演理论的混合与历史实践相结合。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reconsidering the Boredom of King James: Performance and Premodern Histories

The royal entry of King James I into London in 1604 serves as an opportunity to reconsider the relationship between public, urban performance and the primary sources that ostensibly document it. The author revisits his own past study of this occasion, revising and expanding previous conclusions about early modern English performance in light of new research and theory. The article deploys new thinking about performance historiography, arguing that such perspectives unsettle the easy placement of an event in historical chronology, disrupt archival logic, and insist on a degree of historiographical ambiguity. The legacy of new historicism is considered in tandem with current theories of performance history, and a hybridization of new historicism and performance theory is considered in relation to historiographic practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies publishes articles informed by historical inquiry and alert to issues raised by contemporary theoretical debate. The journal fosters rigorous investigation of historiographical representations of European and western Asian cultural forms from late antiquity to the seventeenth century. Its topics include art, literature, theater, music, philosophy, theology, and history, and it embraces material objects as well as texts; women as well as men; merchants, workers, and audiences as well as patrons; Jews and Muslims as well as Christians.