螺旋折流板与节段折流板的热水力性能比较

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 MECHANICS
Mechanika Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.5755/j02.mech.31096
M. Yousfi
{"title":"螺旋折流板与节段折流板的热水力性能比较","authors":"M. Yousfi","doi":"10.5755/j02.mech.31096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution, we reworked the Bell-Delaware technique for a HB-STHX to systematically study its thermohydraulic performance behavior in the shell side. The helical baffles are continuous quadrant sectors with five inclination angles 25°, 30°, 35°, 40° and 45° and are exanimated for six different values of Reynolds number  from  up to 40 . We have observed an increase in global heat transfer rate while a decrease in pressure loss, in continuous helical baffle case compared to segmental one. we have found that the baffle inclination 40° has the largest heat transfer coefficient, 25° gives the lowest pressure drop, whereas 45°, the largest inclination we have used, displays the greatest performance evaluation factor.","PeriodicalId":54741,"journal":{"name":"Mechanika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Helical Baffle Thermohydraulic Performance Versus Segmental Baffle One\",\"authors\":\"M. Yousfi\",\"doi\":\"10.5755/j02.mech.31096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution, we reworked the Bell-Delaware technique for a HB-STHX to systematically study its thermohydraulic performance behavior in the shell side. The helical baffles are continuous quadrant sectors with five inclination angles 25°, 30°, 35°, 40° and 45° and are exanimated for six different values of Reynolds number  from  up to 40 . We have observed an increase in global heat transfer rate while a decrease in pressure loss, in continuous helical baffle case compared to segmental one. we have found that the baffle inclination 40° has the largest heat transfer coefficient, 25° gives the lowest pressure drop, whereas 45°, the largest inclination we have used, displays the greatest performance evaluation factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.31096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanika","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.31096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇论文中,我们对HB-STHX的Bell-Delaware技术进行了重新设计,系统地研究了它在壳侧的热液性能行为。螺旋挡板是连续的象限扇形,有5个倾角25°、30°、35°、40°和45°,并可检测6种不同的雷诺数值,最高可达40。我们观察到,与分段式挡板相比,连续式螺旋挡板的整体传热率增加,压力损失减少。我们发现挡板倾角为40°时传热系数最大,25°时压降最小,而倾角为45°时性能评价因子最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Helical Baffle Thermohydraulic Performance Versus Segmental Baffle One
In this contribution, we reworked the Bell-Delaware technique for a HB-STHX to systematically study its thermohydraulic performance behavior in the shell side. The helical baffles are continuous quadrant sectors with five inclination angles 25°, 30°, 35°, 40° and 45° and are exanimated for six different values of Reynolds number  from  up to 40 . We have observed an increase in global heat transfer rate while a decrease in pressure loss, in continuous helical baffle case compared to segmental one. we have found that the baffle inclination 40° has the largest heat transfer coefficient, 25° gives the lowest pressure drop, whereas 45°, the largest inclination we have used, displays the greatest performance evaluation factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mechanika
Mechanika 物理-力学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal is publishing scientific papers dealing with the following problems: Mechanics of Solid Bodies; Mechanics of Fluids and Gases; Dynamics of Mechanical Systems; Design and Optimization of Mechanical Systems; Mechanical Technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信