跨越鸿沟：公共考古的分类、理论与实践

IF 0.8 4区历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Public Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-10-02 DOI:10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398

M. Oldham

{"title":"跨越鸿沟：公共考古的分类、理论与实践","authors":"M. Oldham","doi":"10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models and classifications have been a part of thinking about public archaeology since at least the early 2000s, but how are these ideas translated into practice? By looking into the development of such classifications and models and by examining archaeologists’ attitudes to an archaeological education outreach project for schoolchildren in Oslo, Norway, this paper looks at the relationship between classification, theory, and practice in public archaeology.","PeriodicalId":45023,"journal":{"name":"Public Archaeology","volume":"16 1","pages":"214 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Gap: Classification, Theory and Practice in Public Archaeology\",\"authors\":\"M. Oldham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Models and classifications have been a part of thinking about public archaeology since at least the early 2000s, but how are these ideas translated into practice? By looking into the development of such classifications and models and by examining archaeologists’ attitudes to an archaeological education outreach project for schoolchildren in Oslo, Norway, this paper looks at the relationship between classification, theory, and practice in public archaeology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"214 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

至少从21世纪初开始，模型和分类就一直是公共考古思考的一部分，但这些想法是如何转化为实践的呢？通过研究这些分类和模型的发展，并通过考察考古学家对挪威奥斯陆学童考古教育外展项目的态度，本文探讨了公共考古分类、理论和实践之间的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bridging the Gap: Classification, Theory and Practice in Public Archaeology

Models and classifications have been a part of thinking about public archaeology since at least the early 2000s, but how are these ideas translated into practice? By looking into the development of such classifications and models and by examining archaeologists’ attitudes to an archaeological education outreach project for schoolchildren in Oslo, Norway, this paper looks at the relationship between classification, theory, and practice in public archaeology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Archaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量