综合法之后的印尼最低工资政策&基于伊斯兰原则的比较分析

Q3 Social Sciences
Mirza Satria Buana, R. Budiman
{"title":"综合法之后的印尼最低工资政策&基于伊斯兰原则的比较分析","authors":"Mirza Satria Buana, R. Budiman","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The labour sector and industrial relations are pivotal for Indonesia’s development, especially in the current neo-capitalist setting. Therefore, this article examined the current Indonesian labour law and its industrial relations through a comparative analysis with Islamic principles, particularly after revision with the 2020 Omnibus Law. Using a socio-legal methodology, it analysed the historical and political contexts of the Acts on labour to determine their tendency to enhance or undermine labourers’ rights. Moreover, this article explored the government’s utilisation of the Acts for suppression and compared the ways of Islamic principles’ regulation of justice in industrial affairs, especially in the minimum wage policy. The study revealed that the 2003 Manpower Law, the 2020 Omnibus Law on Work Creation, and the 2021 Regulation on Wages, which are claimed to protect labourer’ rights, erode them instead. The labour laws are firm in stressing workers’ duties and obligations, yet are indecisive in regulating their rights, leading to the reduction and abolishment of several work benefits. In addition, government authorities are weak and accommodate to the interests of companies and investors. Therefore, this article concluded that the labour law provision, specifically the legal issue of minimum wage policy, does not correspond to Islamic principles and the practices of maslahah and maqosid al-shari’ah.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INDONESIA’S MINIMUM WAGE POLICY AFTER THE OMNIBUS LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FROM ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES\",\"authors\":\"Mirza Satria Buana, R. Budiman\",\"doi\":\"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The labour sector and industrial relations are pivotal for Indonesia’s development, especially in the current neo-capitalist setting. Therefore, this article examined the current Indonesian labour law and its industrial relations through a comparative analysis with Islamic principles, particularly after revision with the 2020 Omnibus Law. Using a socio-legal methodology, it analysed the historical and political contexts of the Acts on labour to determine their tendency to enhance or undermine labourers’ rights. Moreover, this article explored the government’s utilisation of the Acts for suppression and compared the ways of Islamic principles’ regulation of justice in industrial affairs, especially in the minimum wage policy. The study revealed that the 2003 Manpower Law, the 2020 Omnibus Law on Work Creation, and the 2021 Regulation on Wages, which are claimed to protect labourer’ rights, erode them instead. The labour laws are firm in stressing workers’ duties and obligations, yet are indecisive in regulating their rights, leading to the reduction and abolishment of several work benefits. In addition, government authorities are weak and accommodate to the interests of companies and investors. Therefore, this article concluded that the labour law provision, specifically the legal issue of minimum wage policy, does not correspond to Islamic principles and the practices of maslahah and maqosid al-shari’ah.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

劳工部门和劳资关系对印度尼西亚的发展至关重要,尤其是在当前的新资本主义环境中。因此,本文通过与伊斯兰原则的比较分析,特别是在与2020年《综合法》修订后,考察了印尼现行劳动法及其劳资关系。它采用社会法律方法,分析了《劳工法》的历史和政治背景,以确定其加强或损害劳动者权利的倾向。此外,本文探讨了政府利用《法案》进行镇压的情况,并比较了伊斯兰原则在工业事务中,特别是在最低工资政策中对司法的监管方式。该研究显示,2003年的《人力法》、2020年的《创造就业综合法》和2021年的《工资条例》声称保护劳动者的权利,但却削弱了这些权利。劳动法坚定地强调了工人的义务和义务,但在规范他们的权利方面却犹豫不决,导致了一些工作福利的减少和取消。此外,政府当局软弱,照顾公司和投资者的利益。因此,这篇文章的结论是,劳动法的规定,特别是最低工资政策的法律问题,不符合伊斯兰原则和maslahah和maqosid al-shari'ah的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INDONESIA’S MINIMUM WAGE POLICY AFTER THE OMNIBUS LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FROM ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES
The labour sector and industrial relations are pivotal for Indonesia’s development, especially in the current neo-capitalist setting. Therefore, this article examined the current Indonesian labour law and its industrial relations through a comparative analysis with Islamic principles, particularly after revision with the 2020 Omnibus Law. Using a socio-legal methodology, it analysed the historical and political contexts of the Acts on labour to determine their tendency to enhance or undermine labourers’ rights. Moreover, this article explored the government’s utilisation of the Acts for suppression and compared the ways of Islamic principles’ regulation of justice in industrial affairs, especially in the minimum wage policy. The study revealed that the 2003 Manpower Law, the 2020 Omnibus Law on Work Creation, and the 2021 Regulation on Wages, which are claimed to protect labourer’ rights, erode them instead. The labour laws are firm in stressing workers’ duties and obligations, yet are indecisive in regulating their rights, leading to the reduction and abolishment of several work benefits. In addition, government authorities are weak and accommodate to the interests of companies and investors. Therefore, this article concluded that the labour law provision, specifically the legal issue of minimum wage policy, does not correspond to Islamic principles and the practices of maslahah and maqosid al-shari’ah.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信