俯卧位高流量鼻氧合治疗中重度病态肥胖合并COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征的优势:回顾性分析

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Reema Wadhawa, V. Trivedi, Anisha Singh, A. Bhalotra, Vivek Wadhawa, P. Shah, Deepali D. Jadav
{"title":"俯卧位高流量鼻氧合治疗中重度病态肥胖合并COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征的优势:回顾性分析","authors":"Reema Wadhawa, V. Trivedi, Anisha Singh, A. Bhalotra, Vivek Wadhawa, P. Shah, Deepali D. Jadav","doi":"10.4103/theiaforum.theiaforum_134_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 has rapidly spread globally and has become a global public health crisis. Obesity is the most frequent comorbidity exhibited by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Many studies have highlighted the benefits of prone position (PP) with high flow nasal oxygenation (HFNC) in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This further delay intubation, reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stay and decreases overall morbidity. Methods: In this study, we analyzed case record data of morbidly obese patients (body mass index >35Kg/m2) with moderate-to-severe ARDS over 3 months. We evaluated the efficacy of early application of PP with HFNO in morbidly obese patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS on PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Results: A total of 24 morbidly obese patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group F (those who were intubated) and Group S (who did not require invasive mechanical ventilation). One hour of PP along with the use of HFNO, the P/F ratio was significantly higher in Group S (78.23 ± 7.16) than in Group F (63.58 ± 15.40) (P < 0.05). The ICU stay was longer in patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation, 17.33±2.52 days in Group F as compared to 8.11±1.05 days in Group S. Conclusion: PP with HFNO seems safe in morbidly obese patients and may improve oxygenation more than in nonobese patients. It is important to stress the necessity to start out postural treatment as early because the patient's clinical condition permits. PP with HFNO might avoid tracheal intubation and its inherent risks and prove beneficial in resource-limited scenarios.","PeriodicalId":42359,"journal":{"name":"Indian Anaesthetists Forum","volume":"23 1","pages":"68 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pros of prone positioning with high-flow nasal oxygenation in morbidly obese patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"Reema Wadhawa, V. Trivedi, Anisha Singh, A. Bhalotra, Vivek Wadhawa, P. Shah, Deepali D. Jadav\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/theiaforum.theiaforum_134_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 has rapidly spread globally and has become a global public health crisis. Obesity is the most frequent comorbidity exhibited by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Many studies have highlighted the benefits of prone position (PP) with high flow nasal oxygenation (HFNC) in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This further delay intubation, reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stay and decreases overall morbidity. Methods: In this study, we analyzed case record data of morbidly obese patients (body mass index >35Kg/m2) with moderate-to-severe ARDS over 3 months. We evaluated the efficacy of early application of PP with HFNO in morbidly obese patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS on PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Results: A total of 24 morbidly obese patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group F (those who were intubated) and Group S (who did not require invasive mechanical ventilation). One hour of PP along with the use of HFNO, the P/F ratio was significantly higher in Group S (78.23 ± 7.16) than in Group F (63.58 ± 15.40) (P < 0.05). The ICU stay was longer in patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation, 17.33±2.52 days in Group F as compared to 8.11±1.05 days in Group S. Conclusion: PP with HFNO seems safe in morbidly obese patients and may improve oxygenation more than in nonobese patients. It is important to stress the necessity to start out postural treatment as early because the patient's clinical condition permits. PP with HFNO might avoid tracheal intubation and its inherent risks and prove beneficial in resource-limited scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Anaesthetists Forum\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"68 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Anaesthetists Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/theiaforum.theiaforum_134_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Anaesthetists Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/theiaforum.theiaforum_134_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病在全球迅速蔓延,已成为全球性公共卫生危机。肥胖是严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2最常见的合并症。许多研究都强调了俯卧位(PP)高流量鼻氧合(HFNC)对中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的益处。这进一步延迟了插管,减少了重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间,降低了总体发病率。方法:分析3个月以上中重度ARDS合并病态肥胖(体重指数> ~ 35Kg/m2)患者的病例记录资料。我们评估早期应用PP联合HFNO对中重度病态肥胖合并COVID-19 ARDS患者PaO2/FiO2比值的影响。结果:共纳入24例病态肥胖患者。患者分为两组:F组(插管组)和S组(不需要有创机械通气组)。P/F比值S组(78.23±7.16)显著高于F组(63.58±15.40)(P < 0.05)。有创机械通气患者在ICU的住院时间较长,F组为17.33±2.52天,s组为8.11±1.05天。结论:高氧一氧化氮加PP对病态肥胖患者是安全的,对氧合的改善作用优于非肥胖患者。重要的是要强调必须尽早开始体位治疗,因为患者的临床条件允许。HFNO的PP可以避免气管插管及其固有的风险,在资源有限的情况下是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pros of prone positioning with high-flow nasal oxygenation in morbidly obese patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective analysis
Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 has rapidly spread globally and has become a global public health crisis. Obesity is the most frequent comorbidity exhibited by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Many studies have highlighted the benefits of prone position (PP) with high flow nasal oxygenation (HFNC) in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This further delay intubation, reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stay and decreases overall morbidity. Methods: In this study, we analyzed case record data of morbidly obese patients (body mass index >35Kg/m2) with moderate-to-severe ARDS over 3 months. We evaluated the efficacy of early application of PP with HFNO in morbidly obese patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS on PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Results: A total of 24 morbidly obese patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group F (those who were intubated) and Group S (who did not require invasive mechanical ventilation). One hour of PP along with the use of HFNO, the P/F ratio was significantly higher in Group S (78.23 ± 7.16) than in Group F (63.58 ± 15.40) (P < 0.05). The ICU stay was longer in patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation, 17.33±2.52 days in Group F as compared to 8.11±1.05 days in Group S. Conclusion: PP with HFNO seems safe in morbidly obese patients and may improve oxygenation more than in nonobese patients. It is important to stress the necessity to start out postural treatment as early because the patient's clinical condition permits. PP with HFNO might avoid tracheal intubation and its inherent risks and prove beneficial in resource-limited scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Anaesthetists Forum
Indian Anaesthetists Forum ANESTHESIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信