印度的受教育权法案是一个合理的份额吗?分配政治、教育和媒体

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
A. Gilbertson, B. Arnold
{"title":"印度的受教育权法案是一个合理的份额吗?分配政治、教育和媒体","authors":"A. Gilbertson, B. Arnold","doi":"10.1177/14649934221084886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India’s Right to Education Act contains a provision requiring private schools to educate underprivileged children without charging fees, hinting at a new politics of distribution akin to James Ferguson’s notion of the ‘rightful share’. Through analysis of coverage of this provision in English language newspapers, we argue that the role of the media in building legitimacy for a ‘rightful share’ is undermined: by critics’ representations of a market-based distribution of education as more just; by supporters’ use of traditional welfare language of compassion for the meritorious poor; and, by reports of implementation failures that undermine the value of social assistance. This points to the significance of universality, unconditionality and clear distributive logics to the concept of the ‘rightful share’.","PeriodicalId":47042,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Development Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"374 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is India’s Right to Education Act a Rightful Share? Distributive Politics, Education and the Media\",\"authors\":\"A. Gilbertson, B. Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14649934221084886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"India’s Right to Education Act contains a provision requiring private schools to educate underprivileged children without charging fees, hinting at a new politics of distribution akin to James Ferguson’s notion of the ‘rightful share’. Through analysis of coverage of this provision in English language newspapers, we argue that the role of the media in building legitimacy for a ‘rightful share’ is undermined: by critics’ representations of a market-based distribution of education as more just; by supporters’ use of traditional welfare language of compassion for the meritorious poor; and, by reports of implementation failures that undermine the value of social assistance. This points to the significance of universality, unconditionality and clear distributive logics to the concept of the ‘rightful share’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"374 - 391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934221084886\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934221084886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度的《教育权法案》包含一项条款,要求私立学校在不收费的情况下教育贫困儿童,这暗示了一种类似于詹姆斯·弗格森“合法份额”概念的新的分配政治。通过分析英文报纸对这一条款的报道,我们认为媒体在为“合法份额”建立合法性方面的作用受到了损害:批评者认为教育的市场分配更加公正;支持者使用同情有功绩的穷人的传统福利语言;以及关于实施失败的报告,这些报告破坏了社会援助的价值。这指出了普遍性、无条件性和明确的分配逻辑对“合法份额”概念的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is India’s Right to Education Act a Rightful Share? Distributive Politics, Education and the Media
India’s Right to Education Act contains a provision requiring private schools to educate underprivileged children without charging fees, hinting at a new politics of distribution akin to James Ferguson’s notion of the ‘rightful share’. Through analysis of coverage of this provision in English language newspapers, we argue that the role of the media in building legitimacy for a ‘rightful share’ is undermined: by critics’ representations of a market-based distribution of education as more just; by supporters’ use of traditional welfare language of compassion for the meritorious poor; and, by reports of implementation failures that undermine the value of social assistance. This points to the significance of universality, unconditionality and clear distributive logics to the concept of the ‘rightful share’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Development Studies
Progress in Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Progress in Development Studies is an exciting new forum for the discussion of development issues, ranging from: · Poverty alleviation and international aid · The international debt crisis · Economic development and industrialization · Environmental degradation and sustainable development · Political governance and civil society · Gender relations · The rights of the child
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信