{"title":"儿童和年轻人的正念之路","authors":"J. Lehmann","doi":"10.1017/cha.2019.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For more than two decades, there has been enthusiasm for mindfulness training and therapy for children and young people, though it seems the enthusiasm might still outweigh the evidence of efficacy (Greenberg &Harris, 2011). It is certainly an approach that, intuitively, sounds and feels like a good idea. Most of us, and our children, live very “crowded” lives and not only in terms of activities undertaken.We are constantly bombarded by noise, lights and smells; by the pressures to respond to our peers, to the demands of technology and to cultural expectations – family, community and beyond. There is little room for silence and quiet contemplation, time for emotional restoration or for the generation of ideas that come from within ourselves and are part of our creative spirit. So, the permission mindfulness gives us to stop and be in the moment has become more important than perhaps it might have been in times past. It’s no surprise, then, that in the last 10 years or so, mindfulness has grown beyond a therapeutic approach to be a restorative process for adults in all walks of life. In addition, numerous tools have been developed ranging from colouring-in, individual exercises to team and group work exercises. And in this same time frame, tools for children have also been developed in tandem with the introduction of mindfulness into contexts beyond the counselling room. Coholic’s Arts activities for children and young people in need (Coholic, 2010); and Plummer and Surrurier’s Focusing and calming games for children: Mindfulness strategies and activities to help children relax, concentrate and take control (Plummer & Serrurier, 2012) are but two examples of guides and activities that are now used in a variety of environments. Quite apart from mindfulness for children being supported by psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers, it has found purchase in the work of life coaches like van der Steenstraten (2017), who recorded her observations of themany benefits of mindfulness in Educating young children: Learning and teaching in the early childhood years. Many schools have been quick to include mindfulness in the classroom curriculum to allay issues of anxiety, of over-active behaviour (for instance, attention-deficit hyperactive disorder, and to teach self-calming techniques and increase focus as identified by Sheinman, Hadar, Gafni, andMilman (2018). The inclusion of mindfulness in school curricula has been to support positive development, to assist children and young people to overcome stress and promote life skill development that, together, support the educational process. It is the capacity of mindfulness to assist in coping with stressors that offers children and young people a tangible set of skills to build resilience. Most health professionals will be aware that children do not always recognise when they are stressed, but acute and chronic stress can lead to a range of physical symptoms as well as disrupting behavioural patterns and affecting the capacity to learn (Medline, 2019). Educationalists are also championing mindfulness, making strong claims for the differences they notice not only amongst students, but also among teaching staff and parents if their particular programme includes the wider school community. However, there are various approaches to promoting mindfulness in education and, in spite of burgeoning research internationally, there is still the intriguing issue of its long-term impacts on health and wellbeing (Sheinman et al., 2018). Some programmes include students, teachers and parents, while others are focused on the students and teaching staff. The Smiling Mind organisation has been a strong advocate of its Smiling Mind Education Program, which has been evaluated by academics of Deakin University and Insight SRC (Smiling Mind, 2017). The programme was established due to concerns that half of all adults had experienced mental health issues by the age of 14 years, and three-quarters by the age of 24 years, and the resulting high economic costs of mental illness in Australia. The programme also takes account of the Victorian 10-Year Mental Health Plan (State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services, 2015). In the first evaluation report, which included 1853 students and 104 teachers from 12 schools in Victoria, positive changes were noted for both groups. Students, for example, reported that “participation in the program significantly improved sleep,” and there was a","PeriodicalId":44896,"journal":{"name":"Children Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/cha.2019.41","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pathway to mindfulness for children and young people\",\"authors\":\"J. Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cha.2019.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For more than two decades, there has been enthusiasm for mindfulness training and therapy for children and young people, though it seems the enthusiasm might still outweigh the evidence of efficacy (Greenberg &Harris, 2011). It is certainly an approach that, intuitively, sounds and feels like a good idea. Most of us, and our children, live very “crowded” lives and not only in terms of activities undertaken.We are constantly bombarded by noise, lights and smells; by the pressures to respond to our peers, to the demands of technology and to cultural expectations – family, community and beyond. There is little room for silence and quiet contemplation, time for emotional restoration or for the generation of ideas that come from within ourselves and are part of our creative spirit. So, the permission mindfulness gives us to stop and be in the moment has become more important than perhaps it might have been in times past. It’s no surprise, then, that in the last 10 years or so, mindfulness has grown beyond a therapeutic approach to be a restorative process for adults in all walks of life. In addition, numerous tools have been developed ranging from colouring-in, individual exercises to team and group work exercises. And in this same time frame, tools for children have also been developed in tandem with the introduction of mindfulness into contexts beyond the counselling room. Coholic’s Arts activities for children and young people in need (Coholic, 2010); and Plummer and Surrurier’s Focusing and calming games for children: Mindfulness strategies and activities to help children relax, concentrate and take control (Plummer & Serrurier, 2012) are but two examples of guides and activities that are now used in a variety of environments. Quite apart from mindfulness for children being supported by psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers, it has found purchase in the work of life coaches like van der Steenstraten (2017), who recorded her observations of themany benefits of mindfulness in Educating young children: Learning and teaching in the early childhood years. Many schools have been quick to include mindfulness in the classroom curriculum to allay issues of anxiety, of over-active behaviour (for instance, attention-deficit hyperactive disorder, and to teach self-calming techniques and increase focus as identified by Sheinman, Hadar, Gafni, andMilman (2018). The inclusion of mindfulness in school curricula has been to support positive development, to assist children and young people to overcome stress and promote life skill development that, together, support the educational process. It is the capacity of mindfulness to assist in coping with stressors that offers children and young people a tangible set of skills to build resilience. Most health professionals will be aware that children do not always recognise when they are stressed, but acute and chronic stress can lead to a range of physical symptoms as well as disrupting behavioural patterns and affecting the capacity to learn (Medline, 2019). Educationalists are also championing mindfulness, making strong claims for the differences they notice not only amongst students, but also among teaching staff and parents if their particular programme includes the wider school community. However, there are various approaches to promoting mindfulness in education and, in spite of burgeoning research internationally, there is still the intriguing issue of its long-term impacts on health and wellbeing (Sheinman et al., 2018). Some programmes include students, teachers and parents, while others are focused on the students and teaching staff. The Smiling Mind organisation has been a strong advocate of its Smiling Mind Education Program, which has been evaluated by academics of Deakin University and Insight SRC (Smiling Mind, 2017). The programme was established due to concerns that half of all adults had experienced mental health issues by the age of 14 years, and three-quarters by the age of 24 years, and the resulting high economic costs of mental illness in Australia. The programme also takes account of the Victorian 10-Year Mental Health Plan (State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services, 2015). In the first evaluation report, which included 1853 students and 104 teachers from 12 schools in Victoria, positive changes were noted for both groups. Students, for example, reported that “participation in the program significantly improved sleep,” and there was a\",\"PeriodicalId\":44896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children Australia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/cha.2019.41\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2019.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2019.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
二十多年来,人们对儿童和年轻人的正念训练和治疗一直很有热情,尽管这种热情似乎仍然超过了疗效的证据(格林伯格和哈里斯,2011)。从直觉上看,这是一种听起来和感觉起来都不错的方法。我们中的大多数人,以及我们的孩子,都过着非常“拥挤”的生活,这不仅体现在所从事的活动上。我们不断受到噪音、灯光和气味的轰炸;要对同龄人、对技术的要求和对文化的期望——家庭、社区和其他方面——做出反应的压力。几乎没有空间让我们安静沉思,没有时间让我们恢复情感,也没有时间让我们产生来自内心的想法,这些想法是我们创造精神的一部分。所以,正念允许我们停下来,活在当下,这比过去更重要。因此,毫不奇怪,在过去10年左右的时间里,正念已经超越了一种治疗方法,成为各行各业成年人的一种恢复过程。此外,还开发了许多工具,从涂色,个人练习到团队和小组工作练习。与此同时,针对儿童的工具也被开发出来,同时将正念引入咨询室之外的环境。Coholic为有需要的儿童和青少年举办的艺术活动(Coholic, 2010);以及Plummer和Surrurier为儿童设计的专注和镇静游戏:帮助儿童放松、集中注意力和控制的正念策略和活动(Plummer和Serrurier, 2012)只是目前在各种环境中使用的指南和活动的两个例子。除了精神科医生、心理学家和社会工作者支持的儿童正念之外,它还在van der Steenstraten(2017)等生活教练的工作中发现了购买,她记录了她对正念教育幼儿的许多好处的观察:在幼儿时期学习和教学。许多学校迅速将正念纳入课堂课程,以减轻焦虑和过度活跃行为(例如,注意力缺陷多动障碍)的问题,并教授自我镇静技巧和提高注意力,正如谢曼、哈达尔、加夫尼和米尔曼(2018)所指出的那样。将正念纳入学校课程是为了支持积极的发展,帮助儿童和年轻人克服压力,促进生活技能的发展,共同支持教育进程。正是正念的能力帮助儿童和年轻人应对压力源,为他们提供了一套切实的技能来建立适应力。大多数卫生专业人员都会意识到,儿童并不总是能意识到自己的压力,但急性和慢性压力会导致一系列身体症状,扰乱行为模式,影响学习能力(Medline, 2019)。教育学家也在倡导正念,他们强烈声称,如果他们的特定项目包括更广泛的学校社区,他们不仅注意到学生之间的差异,而且还注意到教师和家长之间的差异。然而,在教育中促进正念的方法有很多种,尽管国际上的研究蓬勃发展,它对健康和福祉的长期影响仍然是一个有趣的问题(Sheinman等人,2018)。一些项目包括学生、教师和家长,而另一些项目则侧重于学生和教学人员。微笑心灵组织一直大力倡导其微笑心灵教育计划,该计划已被迪肯大学和Insight SRC的学者评估(微笑心灵,2017)。制定该方案的原因是,澳大利亚有一半的成年人在14岁之前经历过心理健康问题,有四分之三的成年人在24岁之前经历过心理健康问题,因此心理疾病的经济成本很高。该方案还考虑到《维多利亚州十年精神健康计划》(维多利亚州,卫生和人类服务部,2015年)。在第一份评估报告中,来自维多利亚州12所学校的1853名学生和104名教师都发现了积极的变化。例如,学生们报告说,“参加这个项目显著改善了睡眠质量”
The pathway to mindfulness for children and young people
For more than two decades, there has been enthusiasm for mindfulness training and therapy for children and young people, though it seems the enthusiasm might still outweigh the evidence of efficacy (Greenberg &Harris, 2011). It is certainly an approach that, intuitively, sounds and feels like a good idea. Most of us, and our children, live very “crowded” lives and not only in terms of activities undertaken.We are constantly bombarded by noise, lights and smells; by the pressures to respond to our peers, to the demands of technology and to cultural expectations – family, community and beyond. There is little room for silence and quiet contemplation, time for emotional restoration or for the generation of ideas that come from within ourselves and are part of our creative spirit. So, the permission mindfulness gives us to stop and be in the moment has become more important than perhaps it might have been in times past. It’s no surprise, then, that in the last 10 years or so, mindfulness has grown beyond a therapeutic approach to be a restorative process for adults in all walks of life. In addition, numerous tools have been developed ranging from colouring-in, individual exercises to team and group work exercises. And in this same time frame, tools for children have also been developed in tandem with the introduction of mindfulness into contexts beyond the counselling room. Coholic’s Arts activities for children and young people in need (Coholic, 2010); and Plummer and Surrurier’s Focusing and calming games for children: Mindfulness strategies and activities to help children relax, concentrate and take control (Plummer & Serrurier, 2012) are but two examples of guides and activities that are now used in a variety of environments. Quite apart from mindfulness for children being supported by psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers, it has found purchase in the work of life coaches like van der Steenstraten (2017), who recorded her observations of themany benefits of mindfulness in Educating young children: Learning and teaching in the early childhood years. Many schools have been quick to include mindfulness in the classroom curriculum to allay issues of anxiety, of over-active behaviour (for instance, attention-deficit hyperactive disorder, and to teach self-calming techniques and increase focus as identified by Sheinman, Hadar, Gafni, andMilman (2018). The inclusion of mindfulness in school curricula has been to support positive development, to assist children and young people to overcome stress and promote life skill development that, together, support the educational process. It is the capacity of mindfulness to assist in coping with stressors that offers children and young people a tangible set of skills to build resilience. Most health professionals will be aware that children do not always recognise when they are stressed, but acute and chronic stress can lead to a range of physical symptoms as well as disrupting behavioural patterns and affecting the capacity to learn (Medline, 2019). Educationalists are also championing mindfulness, making strong claims for the differences they notice not only amongst students, but also among teaching staff and parents if their particular programme includes the wider school community. However, there are various approaches to promoting mindfulness in education and, in spite of burgeoning research internationally, there is still the intriguing issue of its long-term impacts on health and wellbeing (Sheinman et al., 2018). Some programmes include students, teachers and parents, while others are focused on the students and teaching staff. The Smiling Mind organisation has been a strong advocate of its Smiling Mind Education Program, which has been evaluated by academics of Deakin University and Insight SRC (Smiling Mind, 2017). The programme was established due to concerns that half of all adults had experienced mental health issues by the age of 14 years, and three-quarters by the age of 24 years, and the resulting high economic costs of mental illness in Australia. The programme also takes account of the Victorian 10-Year Mental Health Plan (State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services, 2015). In the first evaluation report, which included 1853 students and 104 teachers from 12 schools in Victoria, positive changes were noted for both groups. Students, for example, reported that “participation in the program significantly improved sleep,” and there was a