国际口腔修复学:二十年的讨论

J. Dudley
{"title":"国际口腔修复学:二十年的讨论","authors":"J. Dudley","doi":"10.26912/SDJ.V2I3.2830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The perception that the specialty of prosthodontics has changed over time is subjective and largely based on personal belief, with little data to uphold this view in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of presentation categories at each International College of Prosthodontists Conference from 1999 to 2017 and identify trends. Methods: Available ICP Conference Programs were sourced from the ICP Administration and the titles of all presentations reviewed and catalogued into one of 13 presentation categories. The number of presentations in each category was expressed as a percentage of the total number of presentations for each conference and statistically analyzed for trends throughout the study period. Results: 69.61% of all presentations from all conferences were categorized as one of implant dentistry; materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies; removable prosthodontics and edentulism; or fixed prosthodontics. 46.38% were categorized as implant dentistry or materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies. The frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry and medically compromised patients; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased (p<0.05) over the study period. Conclusion: The ICP Conference presentation titles reviewed from 1999 to 2017 maintained a focus on implant dentistry and materials, CAD- CAM and digital technologies alongside a diverse range of other topics. Throughout the study period, the frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of presentation of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased.","PeriodicalId":32049,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Dental Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"85 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions\",\"authors\":\"J. Dudley\",\"doi\":\"10.26912/SDJ.V2I3.2830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The perception that the specialty of prosthodontics has changed over time is subjective and largely based on personal belief, with little data to uphold this view in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of presentation categories at each International College of Prosthodontists Conference from 1999 to 2017 and identify trends. Methods: Available ICP Conference Programs were sourced from the ICP Administration and the titles of all presentations reviewed and catalogued into one of 13 presentation categories. The number of presentations in each category was expressed as a percentage of the total number of presentations for each conference and statistically analyzed for trends throughout the study period. Results: 69.61% of all presentations from all conferences were categorized as one of implant dentistry; materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies; removable prosthodontics and edentulism; or fixed prosthodontics. 46.38% were categorized as implant dentistry or materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies. The frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry and medically compromised patients; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased (p<0.05) over the study period. Conclusion: The ICP Conference presentation titles reviewed from 1999 to 2017 maintained a focus on implant dentistry and materials, CAD- CAM and digital technologies alongside a diverse range of other topics. Throughout the study period, the frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of presentation of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26912/SDJ.V2I3.2830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26912/SDJ.V2I3.2830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口腔修复专业随着时间的推移而发生变化的看法是主观的,主要基于个人信仰,文献中几乎没有数据支持这一观点。目的:本研究的目的是比较1999年至2017年每届国际口腔修复学会会议上演讲类别的频率,并确定趋势。方法:可用的国际比较项目会议计划来源于国际比较项目管理局,所有报告的标题都经过审查并编目为13个报告类别之一。每个类别的演讲次数以每次会议演讲总数的百分比表示,并对整个研究期间的趋势进行统计分析。结果:在所有会议的所有演讲中,69.61%被归类为种植牙;材料、CAD-CAM和数字技术;可移除口腔修复术和缺牙术;或固定修复。46.38%被归类为种植牙或材料、CAD-CAM和数字技术。固定修复术的出现频率显著降低,而种植牙的出现频率明显降低;颌面修复学;老年牙科和医学受损患者;临床病例表现和治疗计划在研究期间显著增加(p<0.05)。结论:从1999年到2017年,国际比较项目会议的演讲题目集中在种植牙和材料、CAD/CAM和数字技术以及其他各种主题上。在整个研究期间,固定修复术的出现频率显著降低,而种植牙的出现频率则显著降低;颌面修复学;老年牙科;临床病例表现和治疗计划显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions
Background: The perception that the specialty of prosthodontics has changed over time is subjective and largely based on personal belief, with little data to uphold this view in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of presentation categories at each International College of Prosthodontists Conference from 1999 to 2017 and identify trends. Methods: Available ICP Conference Programs were sourced from the ICP Administration and the titles of all presentations reviewed and catalogued into one of 13 presentation categories. The number of presentations in each category was expressed as a percentage of the total number of presentations for each conference and statistically analyzed for trends throughout the study period. Results: 69.61% of all presentations from all conferences were categorized as one of implant dentistry; materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies; removable prosthodontics and edentulism; or fixed prosthodontics. 46.38% were categorized as implant dentistry or materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies. The frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry and medically compromised patients; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased (p<0.05) over the study period. Conclusion: The ICP Conference presentation titles reviewed from 1999 to 2017 maintained a focus on implant dentistry and materials, CAD- CAM and digital technologies alongside a diverse range of other topics. Throughout the study period, the frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of presentation of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信