水平指标。应用程序功能

IF 0.1 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Gennadiy Narodnytskyi, Evgeniy Suhomlinov, Svitlana Tiupa, O. Marchenko
{"title":"水平指标。应用程序功能","authors":"Gennadiy Narodnytskyi, Evgeniy Suhomlinov, Svitlana Tiupa, O. Marchenko","doi":"10.24027/2306-7039.3.2021.241633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers various aspects of application of the most common types of level gauges – magnetostrictive, servo-driven, radar and reflex. Much attention is paid to accuracy of level gauges, expressed in error and uncertainty, including those referred to the legally regulated measuring instruments. Due to the fact that the most of the level gauges are installed on tanks, the requirements for them, given in the standards, and possible ways to improve the accuracy of level gauges installed on tanks have been analyzed. Methods of verification and calibration of level gauges are considered, including both verification on standard units using water, and carried out by the simulation method. \nThe requirements for the metrological control of level gauges with moving parts are stated. It is shown that for verification of such level gauges, it is necessary to carry out measurements when the water moves both up and down. However, there is no need to take measurements, as in determining the variation, at the same points when the water moves up and when the water moves down. \nSome known caution is needed when using the results of the verification of level gauges by the simulation method. Especially big differences in the results of verification on the standard unit with water and the simulation method are observed for magnetostrictive level gauges. \nThis difference is due to the fact that in these level gauges, the float slides along the pipe with a certain friction, and in the simulation method, the float moves by hand and its movement does not depend on friction.","PeriodicalId":40775,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level gauges. Application features\",\"authors\":\"Gennadiy Narodnytskyi, Evgeniy Suhomlinov, Svitlana Tiupa, O. Marchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.24027/2306-7039.3.2021.241633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers various aspects of application of the most common types of level gauges – magnetostrictive, servo-driven, radar and reflex. Much attention is paid to accuracy of level gauges, expressed in error and uncertainty, including those referred to the legally regulated measuring instruments. Due to the fact that the most of the level gauges are installed on tanks, the requirements for them, given in the standards, and possible ways to improve the accuracy of level gauges installed on tanks have been analyzed. Methods of verification and calibration of level gauges are considered, including both verification on standard units using water, and carried out by the simulation method. \\nThe requirements for the metrological control of level gauges with moving parts are stated. It is shown that for verification of such level gauges, it is necessary to carry out measurements when the water moves both up and down. However, there is no need to take measurements, as in determining the variation, at the same points when the water moves up and when the water moves down. \\nSome known caution is needed when using the results of the verification of level gauges by the simulation method. Especially big differences in the results of verification on the standard unit with water and the simulation method are observed for magnetostrictive level gauges. \\nThis difference is due to the fact that in these level gauges, the float slides along the pipe with a certain friction, and in the simulation method, the float moves by hand and its movement does not depend on friction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrainian Metrological Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrainian Metrological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.3.2021.241633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.3.2021.241633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了最常见类型的液位计应用的各个方面——磁致伸缩、伺服驱动、雷达和反射。液位计的精度受到了极大的关注,用误差和不确定度表示,包括那些涉及法律规定的测量仪器的精度。由于大多数液位计都安装在储罐上,因此分析了标准中对液位计的要求,以及提高储罐上液位计精度的可能方法。考虑了液位计的检定和校准方法,包括在用水的标准装置上进行的检定和通过模拟方法进行的检定。阐述了带有移动部件的液位计的计量控制要求。结果表明,为了验证这种液位计,有必要在水上下移动时进行测量。然而,在确定变化时,不需要在水向上移动和向下移动的相同点进行测量。当使用模拟方法验证液位计的结果时,需要一些已知的注意事项。特别是磁致伸缩液位计在有水的标准装置上的验证结果和模拟方法存在很大差异。这种差异是由于在这些液位计中,浮子以一定的摩擦力沿着管道滑动,而在模拟方法中,浮子通过手动移动,其移动不取决于摩擦力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Level gauges. Application features
This paper considers various aspects of application of the most common types of level gauges – magnetostrictive, servo-driven, radar and reflex. Much attention is paid to accuracy of level gauges, expressed in error and uncertainty, including those referred to the legally regulated measuring instruments. Due to the fact that the most of the level gauges are installed on tanks, the requirements for them, given in the standards, and possible ways to improve the accuracy of level gauges installed on tanks have been analyzed. Methods of verification and calibration of level gauges are considered, including both verification on standard units using water, and carried out by the simulation method. The requirements for the metrological control of level gauges with moving parts are stated. It is shown that for verification of such level gauges, it is necessary to carry out measurements when the water moves both up and down. However, there is no need to take measurements, as in determining the variation, at the same points when the water moves up and when the water moves down. Some known caution is needed when using the results of the verification of level gauges by the simulation method. Especially big differences in the results of verification on the standard unit with water and the simulation method are observed for magnetostrictive level gauges. This difference is due to the fact that in these level gauges, the float slides along the pipe with a certain friction, and in the simulation method, the float moves by hand and its movement does not depend on friction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ukrainian Metrological Journal
Ukrainian Metrological Journal INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信