{"title":"后进先出法的兴衰","authors":"D. Tinkelman, Qianhua Ling","doi":"10.2308/aahj-2021-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We trace the history of LIFO from the 1930s to 2021. LIFO usage rose sharply in the 1970s. LIFO’s supporters praised its matching of recent costs against sales, and its nonrecognition of inventory holding gains. Managers appreciated its tax-lowering effects in inflationary periods. The 1970s LIFO adoptions spurred accounting research into market efficiency and accounting choice. LIFO’s tax advantages began decreasing in the 1980s due to lower tax rates, low inflation, and changing inventory practices. Its theoretical justification weakened as the FASB adopted a Conceptual Framework in the 1980s that deemphasized matching, and instead valued relevance, decision-usefulness, representational faithfulness, and comparability. Without major tax advantages or strong theoretical justifications, LIFO usage declined markedly beginning in the mid-1980s. The IASB disallowed LIFO in 2005. By 2020, LIFO had become a niche method, surviving mainly due to the LIFO conformity rule. Whether its use will increase with renewed inflation is unclear.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rise and Decline of LIFO\",\"authors\":\"D. Tinkelman, Qianhua Ling\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/aahj-2021-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We trace the history of LIFO from the 1930s to 2021. LIFO usage rose sharply in the 1970s. LIFO’s supporters praised its matching of recent costs against sales, and its nonrecognition of inventory holding gains. Managers appreciated its tax-lowering effects in inflationary periods. The 1970s LIFO adoptions spurred accounting research into market efficiency and accounting choice. LIFO’s tax advantages began decreasing in the 1980s due to lower tax rates, low inflation, and changing inventory practices. Its theoretical justification weakened as the FASB adopted a Conceptual Framework in the 1980s that deemphasized matching, and instead valued relevance, decision-usefulness, representational faithfulness, and comparability. Without major tax advantages or strong theoretical justifications, LIFO usage declined markedly beginning in the mid-1980s. The IASB disallowed LIFO in 2005. By 2020, LIFO had become a niche method, surviving mainly due to the LIFO conformity rule. Whether its use will increase with renewed inflation is unclear.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2021-010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2021-010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
We trace the history of LIFO from the 1930s to 2021. LIFO usage rose sharply in the 1970s. LIFO’s supporters praised its matching of recent costs against sales, and its nonrecognition of inventory holding gains. Managers appreciated its tax-lowering effects in inflationary periods. The 1970s LIFO adoptions spurred accounting research into market efficiency and accounting choice. LIFO’s tax advantages began decreasing in the 1980s due to lower tax rates, low inflation, and changing inventory practices. Its theoretical justification weakened as the FASB adopted a Conceptual Framework in the 1980s that deemphasized matching, and instead valued relevance, decision-usefulness, representational faithfulness, and comparability. Without major tax advantages or strong theoretical justifications, LIFO usage declined markedly beginning in the mid-1980s. The IASB disallowed LIFO in 2005. By 2020, LIFO had become a niche method, surviving mainly due to the LIFO conformity rule. Whether its use will increase with renewed inflation is unclear.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.