使用菲律宾语音障碍指数测量可燃香烟和电子烟吸烟者的发音障碍

Maria Angela Dealino, Anna Pamela C Dela Cruz
{"title":"使用菲律宾语音障碍指数测量可燃香烟和电子烟吸烟者的发音障碍","authors":"Maria Angela Dealino, Anna Pamela C Dela Cruz","doi":"10.32412/pjohns.v37i1.1721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nABSTRACT\n\n\n\n\nObjectives: To determine the prevalence of dysphonia, defined as any perceived voice pathology, in conventional cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users and to quantify and compare the Filipino Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores of the two groups based on the mean scores for each of the three domains of this tool, as well as the mean total score for each group.\nMethods: \n\n\n\n\nDesign: Cross-sectional study\nSetting: Tertiary National University Hospital\nParticipants: 52 adults between the ages 18-65 with no previously known laryngeal illness or condition were divided into 26 conventional smokers and 26 e-cigarette users and completed the self-administered Filipino Voice Handicap Index.\n\n\n\n\n \nResults: The prevalence of impairment in the sample using a total VHI score cut-off of 18 was 17.31% (9 out of 52, CI 8.23-30.32%) and the prevalence of dysphonic symptoms in the sample was 86.54% (45 out of 52, CI 74.21-94.41%). There were no significant differences between smokers and e-cigarette users for impairment using this cut-off (z: -1.36, p: .07) and dysphonic symptoms (z: 0.4063, p: .68). The prevalence of moderate impairment was 3.85% (1 out of 26, CI: 0.10-19.64%) among those using e-cigarettes; and 1.92% (1 out of 52, CI: 0.04-10.26%) among the entire sample population.\nConclusion: There appears to be no statistically significant difference between the Filipino VHI scores of conventional smokers and e-cigarette users. Further inquiry into the subject would benefit from a larger sample size, comparison with a control group, inclusion of other factors relevant to the development of dysphonia, and correlation with objective means for voice analysis.","PeriodicalId":33358,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dysphonia in Smokers of Combustible Cigarettes and E-cigarettes Measured Using the Filipino Voice Handicap Index\",\"authors\":\"Maria Angela Dealino, Anna Pamela C Dela Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.32412/pjohns.v37i1.1721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\n\\nABSTRACT\\n\\n\\n\\n\\nObjectives: To determine the prevalence of dysphonia, defined as any perceived voice pathology, in conventional cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users and to quantify and compare the Filipino Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores of the two groups based on the mean scores for each of the three domains of this tool, as well as the mean total score for each group.\\nMethods: \\n\\n\\n\\n\\nDesign: Cross-sectional study\\nSetting: Tertiary National University Hospital\\nParticipants: 52 adults between the ages 18-65 with no previously known laryngeal illness or condition were divided into 26 conventional smokers and 26 e-cigarette users and completed the self-administered Filipino Voice Handicap Index.\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n \\nResults: The prevalence of impairment in the sample using a total VHI score cut-off of 18 was 17.31% (9 out of 52, CI 8.23-30.32%) and the prevalence of dysphonic symptoms in the sample was 86.54% (45 out of 52, CI 74.21-94.41%). There were no significant differences between smokers and e-cigarette users for impairment using this cut-off (z: -1.36, p: .07) and dysphonic symptoms (z: 0.4063, p: .68). The prevalence of moderate impairment was 3.85% (1 out of 26, CI: 0.10-19.64%) among those using e-cigarettes; and 1.92% (1 out of 52, CI: 0.04-10.26%) among the entire sample population.\\nConclusion: There appears to be no statistically significant difference between the Filipino VHI scores of conventional smokers and e-cigarette users. Further inquiry into the subject would benefit from a larger sample size, comparison with a control group, inclusion of other factors relevant to the development of dysphonia, and correlation with objective means for voice analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v37i1.1721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v37i1.1721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:确定传统吸烟者和电子烟使用者的发音困难(定义为任何感知的语音病理)的患病率,并根据该工具三个领域中每个领域的平均得分以及每组的平均总分,量化和比较两组的菲律宾语音障碍指数(VHI)得分。方法:设计:横断面研究设置:国立大学第三医院参与者:52名年龄在18-65岁之间、以前没有已知喉部疾病或状况的成年人被分为26名传统吸烟者和26名电子烟使用者,并完成了自我管理的菲律宾语音障碍指数。结果:使用VHI总分截止值18的样本中,损伤的发生率为17.31%(52分中有9分,CI 8.23-30.32%),吞咽困难症状的发生率是86.54%(52分之45分,CI 74.21-94.41%)。吸烟者和电子烟使用者在使用该截止值的损伤(z:-1.36,p:.07)和吞咽困难症状方面没有显著差异(z:0.4063,p:.68)。在使用电子烟的人群中,中度损伤的患病率为3.85%(26分之一,CI:0.10-19.64%);在整个样本群体中为1.92%(1/52,CI:0.04-10.26%)。结论:传统吸烟者和电子烟使用者的菲律宾VHI评分之间似乎没有统计学上的显著差异。对受试者的进一步调查将受益于更大的样本量、与对照组的比较、包括与发音障碍发展相关的其他因素以及与语音分析的客观手段的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dysphonia in Smokers of Combustible Cigarettes and E-cigarettes Measured Using the Filipino Voice Handicap Index
ABSTRACT Objectives: To determine the prevalence of dysphonia, defined as any perceived voice pathology, in conventional cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users and to quantify and compare the Filipino Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores of the two groups based on the mean scores for each of the three domains of this tool, as well as the mean total score for each group. Methods:  Design: Cross-sectional study Setting: Tertiary National University Hospital Participants: 52 adults between the ages 18-65 with no previously known laryngeal illness or condition were divided into 26 conventional smokers and 26 e-cigarette users and completed the self-administered Filipino Voice Handicap Index.   Results: The prevalence of impairment in the sample using a total VHI score cut-off of 18 was 17.31% (9 out of 52, CI 8.23-30.32%) and the prevalence of dysphonic symptoms in the sample was 86.54% (45 out of 52, CI 74.21-94.41%). There were no significant differences between smokers and e-cigarette users for impairment using this cut-off (z: -1.36, p: .07) and dysphonic symptoms (z: 0.4063, p: .68). The prevalence of moderate impairment was 3.85% (1 out of 26, CI: 0.10-19.64%) among those using e-cigarettes; and 1.92% (1 out of 52, CI: 0.04-10.26%) among the entire sample population. Conclusion: There appears to be no statistically significant difference between the Filipino VHI scores of conventional smokers and e-cigarette users. Further inquiry into the subject would benefit from a larger sample size, comparison with a control group, inclusion of other factors relevant to the development of dysphonia, and correlation with objective means for voice analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信