偏头痛患者的特征与偏头痛功能障碍评估(MIDAS)评分在现实世界临床实践中的应用

Q3 Medicine
V. Chia, A. Bogdanov, A. Yusuf, L. Kallenbach
{"title":"偏头痛患者的特征与偏头痛功能障碍评估(MIDAS)评分在现实世界临床实践中的应用","authors":"V. Chia, A. Bogdanov, A. Yusuf, L. Kallenbach","doi":"10.1177/2515816320928463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Better understanding of migraine treatment in US clinical practice could be facilitated by availability of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire results collected in routine care. We present results for migraine patients with MIDAS collected in routine clinical practice through an electronic medical record (EMR) system that presented the MIDAS questionnaire as an electronic form during the patient office encounter. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to gain better understanding of migraine disability and migraine treatment patterns in US real-world clinical practice. Methods: In this EMR database study, patients were required to have 12 months baseline time for review of patient and clinical characteristics. Adult patients with documentation of migraine with subsequent MIDAS questionnaire data collected between March 2017 and September 2018 were included. Based on MIDAS responses patients were categorized into grade I—little or no disability, grade II—mild disability, grade III—moderate disability, and grade IV—severe disability. Results: This study included 2731 migraine patients with MIDAS results. Overall, 2309 (84.5%) were female with an average age of 46.7 years. Distribution by disability grade was 1161 (42.5%) little or no disability, 424 (15.5%) mild disability, 477 (17.5%) moderate disability, and 669 (24.5%) severe disability. Compared to overall, a larger proportion of patients with severe disability had baseline treatment with acute (71.3% vs. 67.6%) or preventive medications (70.4% vs. 62.0%) and to be on 3+ acute (9.4% vs. 7.0%) or 3+ preventive therapies (17.0% vs. 14.5%). Conclusion: Availability of MIDAS results in usual care provides additional insight into migraine care.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320928463","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of migraine patients with Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores in real-world clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"V. Chia, A. Bogdanov, A. Yusuf, L. Kallenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2515816320928463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Better understanding of migraine treatment in US clinical practice could be facilitated by availability of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire results collected in routine care. We present results for migraine patients with MIDAS collected in routine clinical practice through an electronic medical record (EMR) system that presented the MIDAS questionnaire as an electronic form during the patient office encounter. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to gain better understanding of migraine disability and migraine treatment patterns in US real-world clinical practice. Methods: In this EMR database study, patients were required to have 12 months baseline time for review of patient and clinical characteristics. Adult patients with documentation of migraine with subsequent MIDAS questionnaire data collected between March 2017 and September 2018 were included. Based on MIDAS responses patients were categorized into grade I—little or no disability, grade II—mild disability, grade III—moderate disability, and grade IV—severe disability. Results: This study included 2731 migraine patients with MIDAS results. Overall, 2309 (84.5%) were female with an average age of 46.7 years. Distribution by disability grade was 1161 (42.5%) little or no disability, 424 (15.5%) mild disability, 477 (17.5%) moderate disability, and 669 (24.5%) severe disability. Compared to overall, a larger proportion of patients with severe disability had baseline treatment with acute (71.3% vs. 67.6%) or preventive medications (70.4% vs. 62.0%) and to be on 3+ acute (9.4% vs. 7.0%) or 3+ preventive therapies (17.0% vs. 14.5%). Conclusion: Availability of MIDAS results in usual care provides additional insight into migraine care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320928463\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320928463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320928463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:在常规护理中收集的偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷结果的可用性可以促进对美国临床实践中偏头痛治疗的更好理解。我们介绍了在常规临床实践中通过电子病历(EMR)系统收集的MIDAS偏头痛患者的结果,该系统在患者办公室就诊时以电子形式呈现MIDAS问卷。这项回顾性观察性研究的目的是更好地了解美国现实世界临床实践中的偏头痛残疾和偏头痛治疗模式。方法:在这项EMR数据库研究中,患者被要求有12个月的基线时间来回顾患者和临床特征。纳入了2017年3月至2018年9月期间收集MIDAS问卷数据的偏头痛成年患者。根据MIDAS反应将患者分为i级轻度或无残疾、ii级轻度残疾、iii级中度残疾和iv级重度残疾。结果:本研究纳入了2731例MIDAS结果的偏头痛患者。其中女性2309人(84.5%),平均年龄46.7岁。残疾等级分布为轻度或无残疾1161人(42.5%),轻度残疾424人(15.5%),中度残疾477人(17.5%),重度残疾669人(24.5%)。与总体相比,更大比例的严重残疾患者接受了急性(71.3%比67.6%)或预防性药物(70.4%比62.0%)的基线治疗,并接受了3+急性(9.4%比7.0%)或3+预防性治疗(17.0%比14.5%)。结论:MIDAS结果在常规护理中的可用性为偏头痛护理提供了额外的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of migraine patients with Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores in real-world clinical practice
Background: Better understanding of migraine treatment in US clinical practice could be facilitated by availability of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire results collected in routine care. We present results for migraine patients with MIDAS collected in routine clinical practice through an electronic medical record (EMR) system that presented the MIDAS questionnaire as an electronic form during the patient office encounter. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to gain better understanding of migraine disability and migraine treatment patterns in US real-world clinical practice. Methods: In this EMR database study, patients were required to have 12 months baseline time for review of patient and clinical characteristics. Adult patients with documentation of migraine with subsequent MIDAS questionnaire data collected between March 2017 and September 2018 were included. Based on MIDAS responses patients were categorized into grade I—little or no disability, grade II—mild disability, grade III—moderate disability, and grade IV—severe disability. Results: This study included 2731 migraine patients with MIDAS results. Overall, 2309 (84.5%) were female with an average age of 46.7 years. Distribution by disability grade was 1161 (42.5%) little or no disability, 424 (15.5%) mild disability, 477 (17.5%) moderate disability, and 669 (24.5%) severe disability. Compared to overall, a larger proportion of patients with severe disability had baseline treatment with acute (71.3% vs. 67.6%) or preventive medications (70.4% vs. 62.0%) and to be on 3+ acute (9.4% vs. 7.0%) or 3+ preventive therapies (17.0% vs. 14.5%). Conclusion: Availability of MIDAS results in usual care provides additional insight into migraine care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia Reports
Cephalalgia Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信