这场展览必须继续:21世纪考古学的崩溃、复原和转型

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY

Reviews in Anthropology Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI:10.1080/00938157.2017.1343025

G. Middleton

{"title":"这场展览必须继续:21世纪考古学的崩溃、复原和转型","authors":"G. Middleton","doi":"10.1080/00938157.2017.1343025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Collapse is a theme addressed by specialists from many disciplines, from environmental and sustainability studies to popular culture and the hard sciences, as well as by archaeologists and historians. This review focuses on three recent books about past collapses and sets them in the context of collapse studies. The new contributions build on the growing body of collapse theory and increasing data on individual case studies, but each takes a new direction, adding to the ongoing debates about collapse, resilience, and transformation. While taking us forward, it is apparent that issues of definition and terminology are still an issue in collapse studies. The review also demonstrates that collapse is an area of lively research that can be regarded as a recognizable subfield of archaeological and historical research that also crosses over into other disciplines.","PeriodicalId":43734,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Anthropology","volume":"46 1","pages":"105 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2017.1343025","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The show must go on: Collapse, resilience, and transformation in 21st-century archaeology\",\"authors\":\"G. Middleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00938157.2017.1343025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Collapse is a theme addressed by specialists from many disciplines, from environmental and sustainability studies to popular culture and the hard sciences, as well as by archaeologists and historians. This review focuses on three recent books about past collapses and sets them in the context of collapse studies. The new contributions build on the growing body of collapse theory and increasing data on individual case studies, but each takes a new direction, adding to the ongoing debates about collapse, resilience, and transformation. While taking us forward, it is apparent that issues of definition and terminology are still an issue in collapse studies. The review also demonstrates that collapse is an area of lively research that can be regarded as a recognizable subfield of archaeological and historical research that also crosses over into other disciplines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"105 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2017.1343025\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1343025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1343025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 32

摘要

崩塌是许多学科的专家讨论的主题，从环境和可持续性研究到流行文化和硬科学，以及考古学家和历史学家。这篇综述集中在最近的三本关于过去崩溃的书，并将它们置于崩溃研究的背景下。新的贡献建立在不断增长的崩溃理论和个体案例研究的数据基础上，但每一个都有一个新的方向，增加了关于崩溃，弹性和转变的持续辩论。在我们前进的同时，很明显，定义和术语的问题仍然是崩溃研究中的一个问题。该评论还表明，倒塌是一个活跃的研究领域，可以被视为考古和历史研究的一个可识别的子领域，也跨越到其他学科。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The show must go on: Collapse, resilience, and transformation in 21st-century archaeology

ABSTRACT Collapse is a theme addressed by specialists from many disciplines, from environmental and sustainability studies to popular culture and the hard sciences, as well as by archaeologists and historians. This review focuses on three recent books about past collapses and sets them in the context of collapse studies. The new contributions build on the growing body of collapse theory and increasing data on individual case studies, but each takes a new direction, adding to the ongoing debates about collapse, resilience, and transformation. While taking us forward, it is apparent that issues of definition and terminology are still an issue in collapse studies. The review also demonstrates that collapse is an area of lively research that can be regarded as a recognizable subfield of archaeological and historical research that also crosses over into other disciplines.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.