旧特权与新法律精神:华沙公国的犹太人居住区

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Aleksandra Oniszczuk
{"title":"旧特权与新法律精神:华沙公国的犹太人居住区","authors":"Aleksandra Oniszczuk","doi":"10.4467/24500100STJ.20.002.12916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the most important aspects of government policy aimed at Jews in the nineteenth-century Polish lands was the issue of where Jews could reside. Medieval in its roots, the conviction that some form of separation was needed was vested in contemporary arguments. Pertinent in this context was the stance taken by the authorities of the Duchy of Warsaw. The article discusses the question whether old city privileges imposing restrictions on Jews were in force at that time. The author claims—contrary to previous historiography—that this question cannot be reduced to a simple “yes”or “no”answer. Referring to the concepts of sociology of law, the double dimension of law (law in books and law in action) can be identified. The issue may serve as an interesting example of legal pluralism and the power of law-convictions. Based on ministerial and local correspondence, the analysis leads to two major conclusions. First, while in theory old city privileges were no longer in force— and this was clearly stated by ministers—the latter decided to refrain from announcing this to the public. Moreover, they agreed to develop an unofficial policy of resolving some cases “as if the old privileges were still binding.”Second, the officially introduced concept of district (rewir) was designed to replace the old privileges, as it offered a variety of new justifications. These were linked to the modernization policy, with claims regarding the integration of acculturated individuals, order, sanitation, and safety.","PeriodicalId":37335,"journal":{"name":"Studia Judaica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Old Privileges and the New Spirit of Law: Jewish Residential Areas in the Duchy of Warsaw\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Oniszczuk\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/24500100STJ.20.002.12916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the most important aspects of government policy aimed at Jews in the nineteenth-century Polish lands was the issue of where Jews could reside. Medieval in its roots, the conviction that some form of separation was needed was vested in contemporary arguments. Pertinent in this context was the stance taken by the authorities of the Duchy of Warsaw. The article discusses the question whether old city privileges imposing restrictions on Jews were in force at that time. The author claims—contrary to previous historiography—that this question cannot be reduced to a simple “yes”or “no”answer. Referring to the concepts of sociology of law, the double dimension of law (law in books and law in action) can be identified. The issue may serve as an interesting example of legal pluralism and the power of law-convictions. Based on ministerial and local correspondence, the analysis leads to two major conclusions. First, while in theory old city privileges were no longer in force— and this was clearly stated by ministers—the latter decided to refrain from announcing this to the public. Moreover, they agreed to develop an unofficial policy of resolving some cases “as if the old privileges were still binding.”Second, the officially introduced concept of district (rewir) was designed to replace the old privileges, as it offered a variety of new justifications. These were linked to the modernization policy, with claims regarding the integration of acculturated individuals, order, sanitation, and safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Judaica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Judaica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/24500100STJ.20.002.12916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Judaica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/24500100STJ.20.002.12916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在19世纪的波兰土地上,政府针对犹太人的政策最重要的方面之一是犹太人可以居住在哪里的问题。在中世纪的根源上,认为需要某种形式的分离的信念被赋予了当代的论点。与此相关的是华沙公国当局所采取的立场。这篇文章讨论了对犹太人施加限制的老城特权在当时是否有效的问题。作者声称——与以前的史学相反——这个问题不能简化为一个简单的“是”或“否”的答案。参考法律社会学的概念,可以识别法律的双重维度(书中的法律和行动中的法律)。这个问题可以作为法律多元化和法律定罪的力量的一个有趣的例子。根据部长和地方的信件,分析得出两个主要结论。首先,虽然理论上老城特权不再有效——部长们明确表示了这一点——但后者决定不向公众宣布这一点。此外,他们同意制定一项非官方政策,“就好像旧的特权仍然具有约束力”来解决一些案件。其次,官方引入的地区(重新布线)概念旨在取代旧的特权,因为它提供了各种新的理由。这些都与现代化政策有关,主张融合文化适应的个人、秩序、卫生和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Old Privileges and the New Spirit of Law: Jewish Residential Areas in the Duchy of Warsaw
Among the most important aspects of government policy aimed at Jews in the nineteenth-century Polish lands was the issue of where Jews could reside. Medieval in its roots, the conviction that some form of separation was needed was vested in contemporary arguments. Pertinent in this context was the stance taken by the authorities of the Duchy of Warsaw. The article discusses the question whether old city privileges imposing restrictions on Jews were in force at that time. The author claims—contrary to previous historiography—that this question cannot be reduced to a simple “yes”or “no”answer. Referring to the concepts of sociology of law, the double dimension of law (law in books and law in action) can be identified. The issue may serve as an interesting example of legal pluralism and the power of law-convictions. Based on ministerial and local correspondence, the analysis leads to two major conclusions. First, while in theory old city privileges were no longer in force— and this was clearly stated by ministers—the latter decided to refrain from announcing this to the public. Moreover, they agreed to develop an unofficial policy of resolving some cases “as if the old privileges were still binding.”Second, the officially introduced concept of district (rewir) was designed to replace the old privileges, as it offered a variety of new justifications. These were linked to the modernization policy, with claims regarding the integration of acculturated individuals, order, sanitation, and safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Judaica
Studia Judaica Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Studia Judaica, as an organ of the Polish Association for Jewish Studies, is open to its members and all other scholars interested in a wide area of Jewish studies, such as Jewish history, literature, linguistics, archeology, culture, religion, and more. We aim to publish articles and reviews illustrating current development in a wide area of Jewish studies as conducted by the members of the Association. Our periodical is open also to non-members on assumption the article deals with an aspect of Polish-Jewish studies. By this we hope to create a representative platform of Jewish studies in and on Poland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信