富有魅力的灵修会促进新的福音化吗?第二部分

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
J. Mcdermott
{"title":"富有魅力的灵修会促进新的福音化吗?第二部分","authors":"J. Mcdermott","doi":"10.1353/atp.2020.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article examines Mary Healy’s thesis that charismatic healings are an essential part of evangelization, on the same level as preaching and sacramental ministry. Her proposal lacks a secure biblical basis and entails some mistaken dogmatic presuppositions. She interprets the charism of healing as a stable power bestowed with baptism whereby believers can heal by command, not just by petition and expects miraculous healings to become ordinary in Church life. She mistakenly identifies God’s nature with healing and interprets Jesus’ mission as oriented as much to healing bodies as to saving souls. While the Catholic Charismatic Renewal remains orthodox, one should be aware of tensions between its emphasis on immediate experience of the “Spirit” and the normal sacramental mediation of salvation. An objective apologetics which explains the positive dimension of suffering in Catholicism would be more effective in evangelization.","PeriodicalId":40281,"journal":{"name":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Charismatic Healings Promote the New Evangelization? Part II\",\"authors\":\"J. Mcdermott\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/atp.2020.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This article examines Mary Healy’s thesis that charismatic healings are an essential part of evangelization, on the same level as preaching and sacramental ministry. Her proposal lacks a secure biblical basis and entails some mistaken dogmatic presuppositions. She interprets the charism of healing as a stable power bestowed with baptism whereby believers can heal by command, not just by petition and expects miraculous healings to become ordinary in Church life. She mistakenly identifies God’s nature with healing and interprets Jesus’ mission as oriented as much to healing bodies as to saving souls. While the Catholic Charismatic Renewal remains orthodox, one should be aware of tensions between its emphasis on immediate experience of the “Spirit” and the normal sacramental mediation of salvation. An objective apologetics which explains the positive dimension of suffering in Catholicism would be more effective in evangelization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2020.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2020.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:这篇文章探讨了玛丽·希利的论点,即魅力疗愈是传福音的重要组成部分,与传教和圣事同等重要。她的建议缺乏可靠的圣经基础,并包含了一些错误的教条主义预设。她将治愈的慈善解释为洗礼赋予的一种稳定的力量,信徒可以通过命令而不仅仅是请愿来治愈,并期待奇迹般的治愈在教会生活中变得平凡。她错误地将上帝的本性与治愈联系在一起,并将耶稣的使命解释为既要治愈身体,又要拯救灵魂。虽然天主教的魅力复兴仍然是正统的,但人们应该意识到它对“精神”的直接体验的强调与救赎的正常圣礼调解之间的紧张关系。一个客观的辩护法,解释天主教痛苦的积极方面,将更有效地传播福音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Charismatic Healings Promote the New Evangelization? Part II
ABSTRACT:This article examines Mary Healy’s thesis that charismatic healings are an essential part of evangelization, on the same level as preaching and sacramental ministry. Her proposal lacks a secure biblical basis and entails some mistaken dogmatic presuppositions. She interprets the charism of healing as a stable power bestowed with baptism whereby believers can heal by command, not just by petition and expects miraculous healings to become ordinary in Church life. She mistakenly identifies God’s nature with healing and interprets Jesus’ mission as oriented as much to healing bodies as to saving souls. While the Catholic Charismatic Renewal remains orthodox, one should be aware of tensions between its emphasis on immediate experience of the “Spirit” and the normal sacramental mediation of salvation. An objective apologetics which explains the positive dimension of suffering in Catholicism would be more effective in evangelization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信