银行作为种族化和性别化的组织:对一线员工的访谈

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Terri L. Friedline, So’Phelia Morrow, S. Oh, Thomas Klemm, Jase Kugiya
{"title":"银行作为种族化和性别化的组织:对一线员工的访谈","authors":"Terri L. Friedline, So’Phelia Morrow, S. Oh, Thomas Klemm, Jase Kugiya","doi":"10.1086/721145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banking as an industry and banks as organizations play central roles in determining access to credit and routine retail banking. However, the persistence of well-documented inequalities necessitates questions about how banks provide access. Through in-depth interviews with 36 bank employees, we deployed theories of racialized and gendered organizations to explore banks’ familiar, routinized practices and procedures. Bank employees’ highly predictable, patterned narratives offered supportive evidence of banks as racialized and gendered organizations that diminish the agency of marginalized groups, legitimate unequal resource distribution, credential Whiteness, and decouple practices from official procedures in ways that uphold racial and gender hierarchies. In the context of banks’ familiar and mundane roles of retail banking and customer service, our findings speak to the depths of these organizations’ reliance on racial and gender hierarchies with wide-reaching implications.","PeriodicalId":47665,"journal":{"name":"Social Service Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Banks as Racialized and Gendered Organizations: Interviews with Frontline Workers\",\"authors\":\"Terri L. Friedline, So’Phelia Morrow, S. Oh, Thomas Klemm, Jase Kugiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Banking as an industry and banks as organizations play central roles in determining access to credit and routine retail banking. However, the persistence of well-documented inequalities necessitates questions about how banks provide access. Through in-depth interviews with 36 bank employees, we deployed theories of racialized and gendered organizations to explore banks’ familiar, routinized practices and procedures. Bank employees’ highly predictable, patterned narratives offered supportive evidence of banks as racialized and gendered organizations that diminish the agency of marginalized groups, legitimate unequal resource distribution, credential Whiteness, and decouple practices from official procedures in ways that uphold racial and gender hierarchies. In the context of banks’ familiar and mundane roles of retail banking and customer service, our findings speak to the depths of these organizations’ reliance on racial and gender hierarchies with wide-reaching implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Service Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Service Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721145\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

银行业作为一个行业,银行作为一个组织,在决定获得信贷和常规零售银行业务方面发挥着核心作用。然而,有据可查的不平等现象持续存在,这就需要对银行如何提供准入提出疑问。通过对36名银行员工的深入采访,我们运用种族化和性别化组织的理论来探索银行熟悉的、常规化的做法和程序。银行员工高度可预测、模式化的叙述提供了支持性证据,证明银行是种族化和性别化的组织,削弱了边缘化群体的代理权、合法的不平等资源分配、证书白人化,并以维护种族和性别等级制度的方式将做法与官方程序脱钩。在银行在零售银行和客户服务方面熟悉而平凡的角色背景下,我们的研究结果揭示了这些组织对种族和性别等级制度的依赖程度,具有广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Banks as Racialized and Gendered Organizations: Interviews with Frontline Workers
Banking as an industry and banks as organizations play central roles in determining access to credit and routine retail banking. However, the persistence of well-documented inequalities necessitates questions about how banks provide access. Through in-depth interviews with 36 bank employees, we deployed theories of racialized and gendered organizations to explore banks’ familiar, routinized practices and procedures. Bank employees’ highly predictable, patterned narratives offered supportive evidence of banks as racialized and gendered organizations that diminish the agency of marginalized groups, legitimate unequal resource distribution, credential Whiteness, and decouple practices from official procedures in ways that uphold racial and gender hierarchies. In the context of banks’ familiar and mundane roles of retail banking and customer service, our findings speak to the depths of these organizations’ reliance on racial and gender hierarchies with wide-reaching implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Service Review
Social Service Review SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1927, Social Service Review is devoted to the publication of thought-provoking, original research on social welfare policy, organization, and practice. Articles in the Review analyze issues from the points of view of various disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, view critical problems in context, and carefully consider long-range solutions. The Review features balanced, scholarly contributions from social work and social welfare scholars, as well as from members of the various allied disciplines engaged in research on human behavior, social systems, history, public policy, and social services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信