印刷媒体上的代表:厄瓜多尔的土著运动和国家失业

IF 0.1 Q4 COMMUNICATION
D. Pérez
{"title":"印刷媒体上的代表:厄瓜多尔的土著运动和国家失业","authors":"D. Pérez","doi":"10.26422/AUCOM.2020.0902.PER","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecuador’s Organic Law of Communication (LOC) and its 2008 Constitution promote the production of contents that reflect the worldviews of the country’s 17 nationalities and ethnicities, and tasks news media with producing information based on intercultural and pluricultural principles. Our paper analyzes this regulatory framework in the context of how the El Comercio newspaper in Ecuador covered the protests of October 2019. This period was marked by popular demands and unrest, as civil society rose in opposition to the economic policies of president Lenin Moreno. From October 1 to October 13, Ecuador – like other countries in the region – was torn between dissent, collective action, and social mobilization, on the one hand; and state intimidation, repression, and biased media coverage, on the other. Our survey reveals the stigmas and belittlement that indigenous peoples continue to face as political subjects. This can be seen both in the dispute over public space – an arena crisscrossed by tensions, asymmetries of power, and class conflict – and in the debate over political participation and legitimacy, where the media discourse has woven a discriminatory imaginary against indigenous peoples. In both cases, communication is instrumentalized by traditional media outlets, contributing to differentiation, social exclusion, and the legitimation of accumulation and hegemony.","PeriodicalId":41332,"journal":{"name":"Austral Comunicacion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representaciones en los medios impresos:Movimiento indígena y paro nacional en Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"D. Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.26422/AUCOM.2020.0902.PER\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ecuador’s Organic Law of Communication (LOC) and its 2008 Constitution promote the production of contents that reflect the worldviews of the country’s 17 nationalities and ethnicities, and tasks news media with producing information based on intercultural and pluricultural principles. Our paper analyzes this regulatory framework in the context of how the El Comercio newspaper in Ecuador covered the protests of October 2019. This period was marked by popular demands and unrest, as civil society rose in opposition to the economic policies of president Lenin Moreno. From October 1 to October 13, Ecuador – like other countries in the region – was torn between dissent, collective action, and social mobilization, on the one hand; and state intimidation, repression, and biased media coverage, on the other. Our survey reveals the stigmas and belittlement that indigenous peoples continue to face as political subjects. This can be seen both in the dispute over public space – an arena crisscrossed by tensions, asymmetries of power, and class conflict – and in the debate over political participation and legitimacy, where the media discourse has woven a discriminatory imaginary against indigenous peoples. In both cases, communication is instrumentalized by traditional media outlets, contributing to differentiation, social exclusion, and the legitimation of accumulation and hegemony.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Comunicacion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Comunicacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26422/AUCOM.2020.0902.PER\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Comunicacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26422/AUCOM.2020.0902.PER","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

厄瓜多尔的《传播组织法》及其2008年《宪法》促进制作反映该国17个民族和族裔世界观的内容,并要求新闻媒体制作基于文化间和多元文化原则的信息。我们的论文结合厄瓜多尔《商业报》如何报道2019年10月的抗议活动来分析这一监管框架。这一时期的特点是民众的要求和动乱,民间社会奋起反对列宁-莫雷诺总统的经济政策。从10月1日到10月13日,厄瓜多尔和该地区其他国家一样,一方面在异议、集体行动和社会动员之间左右为难;另一方面是国家恐吓、镇压和有偏见的媒体报道。我们的调查揭示了土著人民作为政治主体继续面临的耻辱和贬低。这既可以在公共空间的争议中看到——这是一个充满紧张局势、权力不对称和阶级冲突的舞台——也可以在关于政治参与和合法性的辩论中看到,在这场辩论中,媒体话语编织了对土著人民的歧视性想象。在这两种情况下,传播都被传统媒体工具化,导致分化、社会排斥,以及积累和霸权的合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representaciones en los medios impresos:Movimiento indígena y paro nacional en Ecuador
Ecuador’s Organic Law of Communication (LOC) and its 2008 Constitution promote the production of contents that reflect the worldviews of the country’s 17 nationalities and ethnicities, and tasks news media with producing information based on intercultural and pluricultural principles. Our paper analyzes this regulatory framework in the context of how the El Comercio newspaper in Ecuador covered the protests of October 2019. This period was marked by popular demands and unrest, as civil society rose in opposition to the economic policies of president Lenin Moreno. From October 1 to October 13, Ecuador – like other countries in the region – was torn between dissent, collective action, and social mobilization, on the one hand; and state intimidation, repression, and biased media coverage, on the other. Our survey reveals the stigmas and belittlement that indigenous peoples continue to face as political subjects. This can be seen both in the dispute over public space – an arena crisscrossed by tensions, asymmetries of power, and class conflict – and in the debate over political participation and legitimacy, where the media discourse has woven a discriminatory imaginary against indigenous peoples. In both cases, communication is instrumentalized by traditional media outlets, contributing to differentiation, social exclusion, and the legitimation of accumulation and hegemony.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Comunicacion
Austral Comunicacion COMMUNICATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信