工作家庭平衡与任期合理:教师评估中的性别差异

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Rodica Lisnic, A. Zajicek, Brinck Kerr
{"title":"工作家庭平衡与任期合理:教师评估中的性别差异","authors":"Rodica Lisnic, A. Zajicek, Brinck Kerr","doi":"10.1080/02732173.2019.1691097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Perceptions of work–family balance and of the reasonableness of tenure expectations are key faculty retention factors. Using a national job satisfaction survey with 2438 tenure-track assistant professors, we explore whether faculty assessment of departmental and institutional support for family–work balance and their satisfaction with family-friendly policies influence their perceptions of the reasonableness of tenure expectations. We pay attention to the importance of gender in our models. Results reveal that women are less likely than men to report tenure expectations as scholars are reasonable and that departments and institutions are supportive of family–work balance. Departmental support for family–work balance, caring for an ill family member, satisfaction with family-friendly policies, and workload have the strongest association with reasonableness. Satisfaction with family-friendly policies has a significant relationship with reasonableness of tenure expectations only for faculty with family care responsibilities. Implications for family-friendly policies and practices in academia are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47106,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Spectrum","volume":"39 1","pages":"340 - 358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02732173.2019.1691097","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work–Family Balance and Tenure Reasonableness: Gender Differences in Faculty Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Rodica Lisnic, A. Zajicek, Brinck Kerr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02732173.2019.1691097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Perceptions of work–family balance and of the reasonableness of tenure expectations are key faculty retention factors. Using a national job satisfaction survey with 2438 tenure-track assistant professors, we explore whether faculty assessment of departmental and institutional support for family–work balance and their satisfaction with family-friendly policies influence their perceptions of the reasonableness of tenure expectations. We pay attention to the importance of gender in our models. Results reveal that women are less likely than men to report tenure expectations as scholars are reasonable and that departments and institutions are supportive of family–work balance. Departmental support for family–work balance, caring for an ill family member, satisfaction with family-friendly policies, and workload have the strongest association with reasonableness. Satisfaction with family-friendly policies has a significant relationship with reasonableness of tenure expectations only for faculty with family care responsibilities. Implications for family-friendly policies and practices in academia are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Spectrum\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"340 - 358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02732173.2019.1691097\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2019.1691097\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2019.1691097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

对工作与家庭平衡的认知和对终身教职期望的合理性是留住教师的关键因素。通过对2438名终身助理教授的全国工作满意度调查,我们探讨了教师对部门和机构对家庭工作平衡支持的评估以及他们对家庭友好政策的满意度是否会影响他们对终身期望合理性的看法。在我们的模型中,我们关注性别的重要性。结果显示,女性比男性更不可能报告终身职位期望,因为学者是合理的,部门和机构支持家庭与工作的平衡。部门对家庭工作平衡的支持、照顾生病的家庭成员、对家庭友好政策的满意度和工作量与合理性的关系最密切。对家庭友好政策的满意度与任期期望的合理性有显著的关系,只有对有家庭照顾责任的教师。讨论了学术界对家庭友好政策和做法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work–Family Balance and Tenure Reasonableness: Gender Differences in Faculty Assessment
Abstract Perceptions of work–family balance and of the reasonableness of tenure expectations are key faculty retention factors. Using a national job satisfaction survey with 2438 tenure-track assistant professors, we explore whether faculty assessment of departmental and institutional support for family–work balance and their satisfaction with family-friendly policies influence their perceptions of the reasonableness of tenure expectations. We pay attention to the importance of gender in our models. Results reveal that women are less likely than men to report tenure expectations as scholars are reasonable and that departments and institutions are supportive of family–work balance. Departmental support for family–work balance, caring for an ill family member, satisfaction with family-friendly policies, and workload have the strongest association with reasonableness. Satisfaction with family-friendly policies has a significant relationship with reasonableness of tenure expectations only for faculty with family care responsibilities. Implications for family-friendly policies and practices in academia are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Sociological Spectrum publishes papers on theoretical, methodological, quantitative and qualitative research, and applied research in areas of sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信