评估印度中部森林竹子管理的可持续性

IF 1.1 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
S. Tambe, S. Patnaik, A. Upadhyay, A. Edgaonkar, Rekha Singhal, Jigyasa Bisaria, P. Srivastava, Kailash Dahake, Mohan H. Hiralal, Devaji Tofa, Sanjay Telharkar, Vijay Edlabadkar, V. Dethe, Kunal Shekhar
{"title":"评估印度中部森林竹子管理的可持续性","authors":"S. Tambe, S. Patnaik, A. Upadhyay, A. Edgaonkar, Rekha Singhal, Jigyasa Bisaria, P. Srivastava, Kailash Dahake, Mohan H. Hiralal, Devaji Tofa, Sanjay Telharkar, Vijay Edlabadkar, V. Dethe, Kunal Shekhar","doi":"10.1080/14728028.2020.1852975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to assess the management of bamboo across the gradient of government and community-managed forests in Maharashtra, a leading Central-Indian state in decentralized forest governance. Over the last few decades, new right-based legislations have paved the way for decentralizing forest governance in India. We first pioneered the multi-stakeholder co-production of criteria and indicators to assess the sustainability of bamboo management. Following this, the sustainability assessment was carried out using mixed methods combining vegetation surveys, focus group discussions and secondary records. We could not detect a significant role of governance in determining bamboo health across governance systems. Instead, sites with favourable locality and biotic factors supported a healthy bamboo crop. We found that while government institutions maximized financial efficiency, community institutions performed better on delivering livelihood benefits and participatory decision making. We could not find evidence of large scale over-harvesting in the community-managed forests. On the contrary, less than 5% of the bamboo potential in these villages was harvested. Traditional bamboo management across the governance gradient focused largely on production aspects. Graduating to sustainable bamboo management will require better protection, resource augmentation, sustainable harvest, enhancing livelihood benefits and creating new bulk markets.","PeriodicalId":12422,"journal":{"name":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","volume":"30 1","pages":"28 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14728028.2020.1852975","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the sustainability of bamboo management in central Indian forests\",\"authors\":\"S. Tambe, S. Patnaik, A. Upadhyay, A. Edgaonkar, Rekha Singhal, Jigyasa Bisaria, P. Srivastava, Kailash Dahake, Mohan H. Hiralal, Devaji Tofa, Sanjay Telharkar, Vijay Edlabadkar, V. Dethe, Kunal Shekhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14728028.2020.1852975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to assess the management of bamboo across the gradient of government and community-managed forests in Maharashtra, a leading Central-Indian state in decentralized forest governance. Over the last few decades, new right-based legislations have paved the way for decentralizing forest governance in India. We first pioneered the multi-stakeholder co-production of criteria and indicators to assess the sustainability of bamboo management. Following this, the sustainability assessment was carried out using mixed methods combining vegetation surveys, focus group discussions and secondary records. We could not detect a significant role of governance in determining bamboo health across governance systems. Instead, sites with favourable locality and biotic factors supported a healthy bamboo crop. We found that while government institutions maximized financial efficiency, community institutions performed better on delivering livelihood benefits and participatory decision making. We could not find evidence of large scale over-harvesting in the community-managed forests. On the contrary, less than 5% of the bamboo potential in these villages was harvested. Traditional bamboo management across the governance gradient focused largely on production aspects. Graduating to sustainable bamboo management will require better protection, resource augmentation, sustainable harvest, enhancing livelihood benefits and creating new bulk markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14728028.2020.1852975\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1852975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1852975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是评估马哈拉施特拉邦政府和社区管理森林的管理情况。马哈拉施特拉邦是印度中部分散森林管理的领先州。在过去的几十年里,新的基于权利的立法为印度的森林治理权力下放铺平了道路。我们首先倡导多方利益相关者共同制定标准和指标,以评估竹子管理的可持续性。随后,采用植被调查、焦点小组讨论和二次记录相结合的混合方法进行了可持续性评估。我们无法发现治理在决定整个治理体系中竹子健康方面的重要作用。相反,具有有利地理位置和生物因素的地点支持了健康的竹子作物。我们发现,虽然政府机构最大限度地提高了财政效率,但社区机构在提供生计福利和参与决策方面表现更好。在社区管理的森林中,我们找不到大规模过度采伐的证据。相反,这些村庄只有不到5%的竹子被收割。传统的竹子管理在治理梯度上主要集中在生产方面。向可持续竹子管理过渡需要更好的保护、资源增加、可持续收获、提高生计效益和创造新的大宗市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the sustainability of bamboo management in central Indian forests
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to assess the management of bamboo across the gradient of government and community-managed forests in Maharashtra, a leading Central-Indian state in decentralized forest governance. Over the last few decades, new right-based legislations have paved the way for decentralizing forest governance in India. We first pioneered the multi-stakeholder co-production of criteria and indicators to assess the sustainability of bamboo management. Following this, the sustainability assessment was carried out using mixed methods combining vegetation surveys, focus group discussions and secondary records. We could not detect a significant role of governance in determining bamboo health across governance systems. Instead, sites with favourable locality and biotic factors supported a healthy bamboo crop. We found that while government institutions maximized financial efficiency, community institutions performed better on delivering livelihood benefits and participatory decision making. We could not find evidence of large scale over-harvesting in the community-managed forests. On the contrary, less than 5% of the bamboo potential in these villages was harvested. Traditional bamboo management across the governance gradient focused largely on production aspects. Graduating to sustainable bamboo management will require better protection, resource augmentation, sustainable harvest, enhancing livelihood benefits and creating new bulk markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Forests, Trees and Livelihoods originated in 1979 under the name of the International Tree Crops Journal and adopted its new name in 2001 in order to reflect its emphasis on the diversity of tree based systems within the field of rural development. It is a peer-reviewed international journal publishing comments, reviews, case studies, research methodologies and research findings and articles on policies in this general field in order to promote discussion, debate and the exchange of information and views in the main subject areas of.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信