Paul M. Johnson, H. Baroud, C. Philip, M. Abkowitz
{"title":"利用经济相互依赖、基于主体和贝叶斯模型评估内河航道破坏的综合方法","authors":"Paul M. Johnson, H. Baroud, C. Philip, M. Abkowitz","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The U.S. inland waterways play a vital role in the domestic economy, but extreme weather events, especially floods, perennially threaten to disrupt their operations. Here, we develop a data-driven approach to analyzing economic risks due to flood closures along the inland waterways that combines agent-based, economic interdependence, and Bayesian modeling. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating economic impacts of various flood disruptions along the Upper Mississippi River and determining cases where a publicly operated, flood-resilient port located near the mouth of the river can reroute shipments and mitigate production losses for the region. We find that Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Missouri are the states that suffer the most production losses from flood disruptions and that agriculture and chemical manufacturing are the most impacted industries. However, during floods whose return periods exceed 30-years, the flood resilient port becomes cost-effective in mitigating losses for the region. Our methodology can be easily extended to other hazards and sections of the inland waterways.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"68 1","pages":"2 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated approach to evaluating inland waterway disruptions using economic interdependence, agent-based, and Bayesian models\",\"authors\":\"Paul M. Johnson, H. Baroud, C. Philip, M. Abkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The U.S. inland waterways play a vital role in the domestic economy, but extreme weather events, especially floods, perennially threaten to disrupt their operations. Here, we develop a data-driven approach to analyzing economic risks due to flood closures along the inland waterways that combines agent-based, economic interdependence, and Bayesian modeling. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating economic impacts of various flood disruptions along the Upper Mississippi River and determining cases where a publicly operated, flood-resilient port located near the mouth of the river can reroute shipments and mitigate production losses for the region. We find that Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Missouri are the states that suffer the most production losses from flood disruptions and that agriculture and chemical manufacturing are the most impacted industries. However, during floods whose return periods exceed 30-years, the flood resilient port becomes cost-effective in mitigating losses for the region. Our methodology can be easily extended to other hazards and sections of the inland waterways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"2 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An integrated approach to evaluating inland waterway disruptions using economic interdependence, agent-based, and Bayesian models
Abstract The U.S. inland waterways play a vital role in the domestic economy, but extreme weather events, especially floods, perennially threaten to disrupt their operations. Here, we develop a data-driven approach to analyzing economic risks due to flood closures along the inland waterways that combines agent-based, economic interdependence, and Bayesian modeling. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating economic impacts of various flood disruptions along the Upper Mississippi River and determining cases where a publicly operated, flood-resilient port located near the mouth of the river can reroute shipments and mitigate production losses for the region. We find that Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Missouri are the states that suffer the most production losses from flood disruptions and that agriculture and chemical manufacturing are the most impacted industries. However, during floods whose return periods exceed 30-years, the flood resilient port becomes cost-effective in mitigating losses for the region. Our methodology can be easily extended to other hazards and sections of the inland waterways.
Engineering EconomistENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment.
The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.