米沙石碑中所谓的“贝斯·大卫”:反对它的案例

IF 1.3 1区历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/03344355.2019.1650494

N. Na’aman

{"title":"米沙石碑中所谓的“贝斯·大卫”:反对它的案例","authors":"N. Na’aman","doi":"10.1080/03344355.2019.1650494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article examines the validity of the rendering בתדוד in Line 31 of the Mesha Stele (“And as for Ḥāwrônên, בתדוד dwelt in it”). Examination of the corpus of West Semitic royal inscriptions reveals only one parallel to a kingdom's name that functions as the operative agent in a royal inscription. Evidently, the suggested restoration בתדוד that is governed by the verb ישב in the badly eroded Line 31 should be rejected. Rather, the best proposal thus far for the controversial line is the recently posited restoration, “And as for Ḥāwrônên, there dwelt Ba[lak]”.","PeriodicalId":51839,"journal":{"name":"Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University","volume":"46 1","pages":"192 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03344355.2019.1650494","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Alleged ‘Beth David’ in the Mesha Stele: The Case Against It\",\"authors\":\"N. Na’aman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03344355.2019.1650494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The article examines the validity of the rendering בתדוד in Line 31 of the Mesha Stele (“And as for Ḥāwrônên, בתדוד dwelt in it”). Examination of the corpus of West Semitic royal inscriptions reveals only one parallel to a kingdom's name that functions as the operative agent in a royal inscription. Evidently, the suggested restoration בתדוד that is governed by the verb ישב in the badly eroded Line 31 should be rejected. Rather, the best proposal thus far for the controversial line is the recently posited restoration, “And as for Ḥāwrônên, there dwelt Ba[lak]”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"192 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03344355.2019.1650494\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03344355.2019.1650494\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03344355.2019.1650494","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

文摘本文研究的有效性呈现בתדוד石碑米沙的第31行(“至于Ḥāwronen,בתדוד住在”)。对西闪族王室铭文语料库的研究显示，在王室铭文中，只有一个与王国名称相似的词作为有效代理。显然，在被严重侵蚀的第31行中，由动词“”支配的修复建议应该被拒绝。相反，对于有争议的路线，迄今为止最好的建议是最近提出的修复，“至于Ḥāwrônên，那里住着Ba[lak]”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Alleged ‘Beth David’ in the Mesha Stele: The Case Against It

Abstract The article examines the validity of the rendering בתדוד in Line 31 of the Mesha Stele (“And as for Ḥāwrônên, בתדוד dwelt in it”). Examination of the corpus of West Semitic royal inscriptions reveals only one parallel to a kingdom's name that functions as the operative agent in a royal inscription. Evidently, the suggested restoration בתדוד that is governed by the verb ישב in the badly eroded Line 31 should be rejected. Rather, the best proposal thus far for the controversial line is the recently posited restoration, “And as for Ḥāwrônên, there dwelt Ba[lak]”.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tel Aviv-Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University ARCHAEOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

12.50%

发文量