威斯敏斯特大厅的罗马式屋顶结构

IF 0.2 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
N. Hill
{"title":"威斯敏斯特大厅的罗马式屋顶结构","authors":"N. Hill","doi":"10.1080/00681288.2022.2033012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little direct evidence remains for the original 1090s roof structure of Westminster Hall. The prevailing view has been that, until its replacement in the 1390s, the interior must have been divided by aisles to support the very wide span of the roof. This view was challenged by Roland Harris and Daniel Miles in 2013, with a proposal for a clear-spanning roof structure, which would be quite exceptional for the period. This article uses evidence from both Westminster and comparable buildings to explore the feasibility of alternative structural forms in some detail, with reconstruction drawings. Significant problems are encountered with all of the alternative forms, leading to a strong affirmation of the theory proposed by Harris and Miles. The Norman hall at Westminster was planned and roofed without internal arcades or piers, whether of timber or masonry. Westminster Hall thus played no part in the development of the English aisled hall.","PeriodicalId":42723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Archaeological Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Romanesque Roof Structure of Westminster Hall\",\"authors\":\"N. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00681288.2022.2033012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Little direct evidence remains for the original 1090s roof structure of Westminster Hall. The prevailing view has been that, until its replacement in the 1390s, the interior must have been divided by aisles to support the very wide span of the roof. This view was challenged by Roland Harris and Daniel Miles in 2013, with a proposal for a clear-spanning roof structure, which would be quite exceptional for the period. This article uses evidence from both Westminster and comparable buildings to explore the feasibility of alternative structural forms in some detail, with reconstruction drawings. Significant problems are encountered with all of the alternative forms, leading to a strong affirmation of the theory proposed by Harris and Miles. The Norman hall at Westminster was planned and roofed without internal arcades or piers, whether of timber or masonry. Westminster Hall thus played no part in the development of the English aisled hall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the British Archaeological Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the British Archaeological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00681288.2022.2033012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Archaeological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00681288.2022.2033012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几乎没有直接证据表明威斯敏斯特大厅的原始屋顶结构是在20世纪90年代。流行的观点是,在1390年代被替换之前,教堂内部一定是由过道分隔的,以支撑非常大的屋顶跨度。这一观点在2013年受到了Roland Harris和Daniel Miles的挑战,他们提出了一个清晰的屋顶结构,这在当时是非常特殊的。本文利用威斯敏斯特和类似建筑的证据,详细探讨了替代结构形式的可行性,并附有重建图纸。所有的替代形式都遇到了重大的问题,这导致了对哈里斯和迈尔斯提出的理论的强烈肯定。威斯敏斯特的诺曼大厅是有计划的,屋顶没有内部拱廊或桥墩,无论是木材还是砖石。因此,威斯敏斯特大厅在英国走廊大厅的发展中没有发挥任何作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Romanesque Roof Structure of Westminster Hall
Little direct evidence remains for the original 1090s roof structure of Westminster Hall. The prevailing view has been that, until its replacement in the 1390s, the interior must have been divided by aisles to support the very wide span of the roof. This view was challenged by Roland Harris and Daniel Miles in 2013, with a proposal for a clear-spanning roof structure, which would be quite exceptional for the period. This article uses evidence from both Westminster and comparable buildings to explore the feasibility of alternative structural forms in some detail, with reconstruction drawings. Significant problems are encountered with all of the alternative forms, leading to a strong affirmation of the theory proposed by Harris and Miles. The Norman hall at Westminster was planned and roofed without internal arcades or piers, whether of timber or masonry. Westminster Hall thus played no part in the development of the English aisled hall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信