经济学复制危机的部分解决方案

W. Briggs
{"title":"经济学复制危机的部分解决方案","authors":"W. Briggs","doi":"10.1108/ajeb-03-2023-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeImportant research once thought unassailable has failed to replicate. Not just in economics, but in all science. The problem is therefore not in dispute nor are some of the causes, like low power, selective reporting, the file drawer effect, publicly unavailable data and so forth. Some partially worthy solutions have already been offered, like pre-registering hypotheses and data analysis plans.Design/methodology/approachThis is a review paper on the replication crisis, which is by now very well known.FindingsThis study offers another partial solution, which is to remind researchers that correlation does not logically imply causation. The effect of this reminder is to eschew “significance” testing, whether in frequentist or Bayesian form (like Bayes factors) and to report models in predictive form, so that anybody can check the veracity of any model. In effect, all papers could undergo replication testing.Originality/value The author argues that this, or any solution, will never eliminate all errors.","PeriodicalId":34606,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A partial solution for the replication crisis in economics\",\"authors\":\"W. Briggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ajeb-03-2023-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeImportant research once thought unassailable has failed to replicate. Not just in economics, but in all science. The problem is therefore not in dispute nor are some of the causes, like low power, selective reporting, the file drawer effect, publicly unavailable data and so forth. Some partially worthy solutions have already been offered, like pre-registering hypotheses and data analysis plans.Design/methodology/approachThis is a review paper on the replication crisis, which is by now very well known.FindingsThis study offers another partial solution, which is to remind researchers that correlation does not logically imply causation. The effect of this reminder is to eschew “significance” testing, whether in frequentist or Bayesian form (like Bayes factors) and to report models in predictive form, so that anybody can check the veracity of any model. In effect, all papers could undergo replication testing.Originality/value The author argues that this, or any solution, will never eliminate all errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-03-2023-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-03-2023-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的曾经被认为无懈可击的重要研究已经无法复制。不仅在经济学,而且在所有科学领域。因此,这个问题没有争议,一些原因也没有争议,比如权力低、选择性报告、文件抽屉效应、公开不可用的数据等等。已经提供了一些部分有价值的解决方案,如预先注册的假设和数据分析计划。设计/方法论/方法这是一篇关于复制危机的综述论文,目前已广为人知。发现这项研究提供了另一个部分解决方案,即提醒研究人员相关性在逻辑上并不意味着因果关系。这一提醒的效果是避免“显著性”测试,无论是以频率论还是贝叶斯形式(如贝叶斯因子),并以预测形式报告模型,这样任何人都可以检查任何模型的准确性。实际上,所有论文都可以进行复制测试。独创性/价值作者认为,这或任何解决方案都永远不会消除所有错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A partial solution for the replication crisis in economics
PurposeImportant research once thought unassailable has failed to replicate. Not just in economics, but in all science. The problem is therefore not in dispute nor are some of the causes, like low power, selective reporting, the file drawer effect, publicly unavailable data and so forth. Some partially worthy solutions have already been offered, like pre-registering hypotheses and data analysis plans.Design/methodology/approachThis is a review paper on the replication crisis, which is by now very well known.FindingsThis study offers another partial solution, which is to remind researchers that correlation does not logically imply causation. The effect of this reminder is to eschew “significance” testing, whether in frequentist or Bayesian form (like Bayes factors) and to report models in predictive form, so that anybody can check the veracity of any model. In effect, all papers could undergo replication testing.Originality/value The author argues that this, or any solution, will never eliminate all errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信