产前药物使用政策对患有阿片类药物使用障碍的商业保险孕妇的影响

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nadia Tabatabaeepour , Jake R. Morgan , Ali Jalali , Shashi N. Kapadia , Angélica Meinhofer
{"title":"产前药物使用政策对患有阿片类药物使用障碍的商业保险孕妇的影响","authors":"Nadia Tabatabaeepour ,&nbsp;Jake R. Morgan ,&nbsp;Ali Jalali ,&nbsp;Shashi N. Kapadia ,&nbsp;Angélica Meinhofer","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>States' approaches to addressing prenatal substance use are widely heterogeneous, ranging from supportive policies that enhance access to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment to punitive policies that criminalize prenatal substance use. We studied the effect of these prenatal substance use policies (PSUPs) on medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, including buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone, psychosocial services for SUD treatment, opioid prescriptions, and opioid overdoses among commercially insured pregnant females with OUD. We evaluated: (1) punitive PSUPs criminalizing prenatal substance use or defining it as child maltreatment; (2) supportive PSUPs granting pregnant females priority access to SUD treatment; and (3) supportive PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs for pregnant females.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed 2006–2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data. The longitudinal sample comprised females aged 15–45 with an OUD diagnosis at least once during the study period. We estimated fixed effects models that compared changes in outcomes between pregnant and nonpregnant females, in states with and without a PSUP, before and after PSUP implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our analytical sample comprised 2,438,875 person-quarters from 164,538 unique females, of which 13% were pregnant at least once during the study period. We found that following the implementation of PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs, the proportion of opioid overdoses decreased 45% and of any OUD medication increased 11%, with buprenorphine driving this increase (13%). The implementation of SUD treatment priority PSUPs was not associated with significant changes in outcomes. Following punitive PSUP implementation, the proportion receiving psychosocial services for SUD (12%) and methadone (30%) services decreased. In specifications that estimated the impact of criminalizing policies only, the strongest type of punitive PSUP, opioid overdoses increased 45%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that supportive approaches that enhance access to SUD treatment may effectively reduce adverse maternal outcomes associated with prenatal opioid use. In contrast, punitive approaches may have harmful effects. These findings support leading medical organizations' stance on PSUPs, which advocate for supportive policies that are centered on increased access to SUD treatment and safeguard against discrimination and stigmatization. Our findings also oppose punitive policies, as they may intensify marginalization of pregnant females with OUD seeking treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 108800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357143/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of prenatal substance use policies on commercially insured pregnant females with opioid use disorder\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Tabatabaeepour ,&nbsp;Jake R. Morgan ,&nbsp;Ali Jalali ,&nbsp;Shashi N. Kapadia ,&nbsp;Angélica Meinhofer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>States' approaches to addressing prenatal substance use are widely heterogeneous, ranging from supportive policies that enhance access to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment to punitive policies that criminalize prenatal substance use. We studied the effect of these prenatal substance use policies (PSUPs) on medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, including buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone, psychosocial services for SUD treatment, opioid prescriptions, and opioid overdoses among commercially insured pregnant females with OUD. We evaluated: (1) punitive PSUPs criminalizing prenatal substance use or defining it as child maltreatment; (2) supportive PSUPs granting pregnant females priority access to SUD treatment; and (3) supportive PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs for pregnant females.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed 2006–2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data. The longitudinal sample comprised females aged 15–45 with an OUD diagnosis at least once during the study period. We estimated fixed effects models that compared changes in outcomes between pregnant and nonpregnant females, in states with and without a PSUP, before and after PSUP implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our analytical sample comprised 2,438,875 person-quarters from 164,538 unique females, of which 13% were pregnant at least once during the study period. We found that following the implementation of PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs, the proportion of opioid overdoses decreased 45% and of any OUD medication increased 11%, with buprenorphine driving this increase (13%). The implementation of SUD treatment priority PSUPs was not associated with significant changes in outcomes. Following punitive PSUP implementation, the proportion receiving psychosocial services for SUD (12%) and methadone (30%) services decreased. In specifications that estimated the impact of criminalizing policies only, the strongest type of punitive PSUP, opioid overdoses increased 45%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that supportive approaches that enhance access to SUD treatment may effectively reduce adverse maternal outcomes associated with prenatal opioid use. In contrast, punitive approaches may have harmful effects. These findings support leading medical organizations' stance on PSUPs, which advocate for supportive policies that are centered on increased access to SUD treatment and safeguard against discrimination and stigmatization. Our findings also oppose punitive policies, as they may intensify marginalization of pregnant females with OUD seeking treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000824\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

引言:各国处理产前药物使用问题的方法多种多样,从增加药物使用障碍治疗机会的支持性政策到将产前药物使用定为刑事犯罪的惩罚性政策。我们研究了这些产前药物使用政策(PSUP)对阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗药物的影响,包括丁丙诺啡、纳曲酮和美沙酮、SUD治疗的心理社会服务、阿片类处方和商业保险的OUD孕妇阿片类药过量。我们评估了:(1)惩罚性PSUP将产前使用药物定为犯罪或将其定义为虐待儿童;(2) 支持性PSUP给予孕妇优先获得SUD治疗的机会;以及(3)支持性PSUP资助针对孕妇的SUD治疗计划。方法:分析2006-2019年MarketScan商业索赔和遭遇数据。纵向样本包括15-45岁的女性,在研究期间至少有一次OUD诊断。我们估计了固定效应模型,该模型比较了在实施PSUP之前和之后,在有和没有PSUP的州,孕妇和非孕妇之间的结果变化。结果:我们的分析样本包括来自164538名独特女性的2438875人,其中13%在研究期间至少怀孕过一次。我们发现,在实施PSUPs资助的有针对性的SUD治疗项目后,阿片类药物过量的比例下降了45%,任何OUD药物的比例上升了11%,丁丙诺啡推动了这一增长(13%)。SUD治疗优先PSUP的实施与结果的显著变化无关。实施惩罚性PSUP后,接受SUD(12%)和美沙酮(30%)心理社会服务的比例下降。在仅估计刑事政策影响的规范中,阿片类药物过量增加了45%,这是最严厉的惩罚性PSUP类型。结论:我们的研究结果表明,增加SUD治疗机会的支持性方法可以有效减少与产前阿片类药使用相关的不良母体结局。相比之下,惩罚性做法可能会产生有害影响。这些发现支持了领先的医疗组织对PSUP的立场,PSUP倡导以增加获得SUD治疗的机会为中心的支持政策,并防止歧视和污名化。我们的研究结果也反对惩罚性政策,因为这些政策可能会加剧患有强迫症的孕妇寻求治疗的边缘化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of prenatal substance use policies on commercially insured pregnant females with opioid use disorder

Impact of prenatal substance use policies on commercially insured pregnant females with opioid use disorder

Introduction

States' approaches to addressing prenatal substance use are widely heterogeneous, ranging from supportive policies that enhance access to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment to punitive policies that criminalize prenatal substance use. We studied the effect of these prenatal substance use policies (PSUPs) on medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, including buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone, psychosocial services for SUD treatment, opioid prescriptions, and opioid overdoses among commercially insured pregnant females with OUD. We evaluated: (1) punitive PSUPs criminalizing prenatal substance use or defining it as child maltreatment; (2) supportive PSUPs granting pregnant females priority access to SUD treatment; and (3) supportive PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs for pregnant females.

Methods

We analyzed 2006–2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data. The longitudinal sample comprised females aged 15–45 with an OUD diagnosis at least once during the study period. We estimated fixed effects models that compared changes in outcomes between pregnant and nonpregnant females, in states with and without a PSUP, before and after PSUP implementation.

Results

Our analytical sample comprised 2,438,875 person-quarters from 164,538 unique females, of which 13% were pregnant at least once during the study period. We found that following the implementation of PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs, the proportion of opioid overdoses decreased 45% and of any OUD medication increased 11%, with buprenorphine driving this increase (13%). The implementation of SUD treatment priority PSUPs was not associated with significant changes in outcomes. Following punitive PSUP implementation, the proportion receiving psychosocial services for SUD (12%) and methadone (30%) services decreased. In specifications that estimated the impact of criminalizing policies only, the strongest type of punitive PSUP, opioid overdoses increased 45%.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that supportive approaches that enhance access to SUD treatment may effectively reduce adverse maternal outcomes associated with prenatal opioid use. In contrast, punitive approaches may have harmful effects. These findings support leading medical organizations' stance on PSUPs, which advocate for supportive policies that are centered on increased access to SUD treatment and safeguard against discrimination and stigmatization. Our findings also oppose punitive policies, as they may intensify marginalization of pregnant females with OUD seeking treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信