Abison Logeswaran MB BS, BSc, MSc, Yu Jeat Chong MB BS, BSc, MSc, John Awad MB BS, Matthew R. Edmunds PhD, MRCP, FRCOphth
{"title":"白内障手术在线信息质量评估","authors":"Abison Logeswaran MB BS, BSc, MSc, Yu Jeat Chong MB BS, BSc, MSc, John Awad MB BS, Matthew R. Edmunds PhD, MRCP, FRCOphth","doi":"10.1016/j.jcro.2018.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The quality of health information of 51 unique websites on cataract surgery was assessed using 2 validated instruments, the DISCERN instrument and JAMA benchmark criteria. Quality was evaluated on a combination of different criteria such as aims, resources cited, bias, authorship, and </span>treatment choices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14598,"journal":{"name":"JCRS Online Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 57-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcro.2018.05.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the quality of online information on cataract surgery\",\"authors\":\"Abison Logeswaran MB BS, BSc, MSc, Yu Jeat Chong MB BS, BSc, MSc, John Awad MB BS, Matthew R. Edmunds PhD, MRCP, FRCOphth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcro.2018.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The quality of health information of 51 unique websites on cataract surgery was assessed using 2 validated instruments, the DISCERN instrument and JAMA benchmark criteria. Quality was evaluated on a combination of different criteria such as aims, resources cited, bias, authorship, and </span>treatment choices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCRS Online Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 57-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcro.2018.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCRS Online Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214167718300425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCRS Online Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214167718300425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of the quality of online information on cataract surgery
The quality of health information of 51 unique websites on cataract surgery was assessed using 2 validated instruments, the DISCERN instrument and JAMA benchmark criteria. Quality was evaluated on a combination of different criteria such as aims, resources cited, bias, authorship, and treatment choices.