舒马曲坦作为周期性呕吐综合征的流产治疗:一项横断面研究

Q3 Medicine
Bixuan Lin, Zhipeng Zhou, T. Venkatesan
{"title":"舒马曲坦作为周期性呕吐综合征的流产治疗:一项横断面研究","authors":"Bixuan Lin, Zhipeng Zhou, T. Venkatesan","doi":"10.1177/2515816320958174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is characterized by episodic vomiting and shares similarities with migraine headache. Guidelines recommend using triptans as abortive therapy in CVS, but there are limited data on its efficacy. Methods: We thus sought to characterize sumatriptan use and performed a cross-sectional study of adults with CVS episodes within the previous 6 months. Questionnaires about demographics, clinical characteristics, and response to sumatriptan (defined as >50% reduction in symptoms) were administered via e-mail. We investigated differences between responders and nonresponders, using χ 2 and Student’s t test. Results: Of 101 participants (age 41 ± 15 years, 74% female, 83% Caucasian), 39 (38%) used sumatriptan during their last CVS attack. Most reported an improvement in nausea (55%), vomiting (59%), and abdominal pain (43%) within 2 h and at 24 h (67%, 73%, and 67%) respectively. Eighteen (46%) reported that sumatriptan helped them avoid emergency department visits and 20 (51%) avoided being hospitalized. Nonresponse to sumatriptan was associated with depression (p = 0.01), current cannabis use (p = 0.02), use of benzodiazepines (p = 0.04), and opioids (0.02) during an episode. No serious side effects were noted. Conclusions: Sumatriptan use reduced symptoms of CVS but did not abort them. Prospective studies to determine its independent effects are needed.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320958174","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sumatriptan as abortive treatment in cyclic vomiting syndrome: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Bixuan Lin, Zhipeng Zhou, T. Venkatesan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2515816320958174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is characterized by episodic vomiting and shares similarities with migraine headache. Guidelines recommend using triptans as abortive therapy in CVS, but there are limited data on its efficacy. Methods: We thus sought to characterize sumatriptan use and performed a cross-sectional study of adults with CVS episodes within the previous 6 months. Questionnaires about demographics, clinical characteristics, and response to sumatriptan (defined as >50% reduction in symptoms) were administered via e-mail. We investigated differences between responders and nonresponders, using χ 2 and Student’s t test. Results: Of 101 participants (age 41 ± 15 years, 74% female, 83% Caucasian), 39 (38%) used sumatriptan during their last CVS attack. Most reported an improvement in nausea (55%), vomiting (59%), and abdominal pain (43%) within 2 h and at 24 h (67%, 73%, and 67%) respectively. Eighteen (46%) reported that sumatriptan helped them avoid emergency department visits and 20 (51%) avoided being hospitalized. Nonresponse to sumatriptan was associated with depression (p = 0.01), current cannabis use (p = 0.02), use of benzodiazepines (p = 0.04), and opioids (0.02) during an episode. No serious side effects were noted. Conclusions: Sumatriptan use reduced symptoms of CVS but did not abort them. Prospective studies to determine its independent effects are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320958174\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320958174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320958174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

周期性呕吐综合征(CVS)以发作性呕吐为特征,与偏头痛有相似之处。指南建议在CVS中使用曲坦作为流产治疗,但关于其疗效的数据有限。方法:因此,我们试图描述舒马曲坦的使用特点,并对前6个月内出现CVS发作的成年人进行了横断面研究。关于人口统计学、临床特征和对舒马曲坦的反应(定义为症状减少50%以上)的问卷调查通过电子邮件进行。我们使用χ2和Student t检验调查了应答者和无应答者之间的差异。结果:在101名参与者(年龄41±15岁,74%为女性,83%为白人)中,39人(38%)在最后一次CVS发作时使用了舒马曲坦。大多数患者报告恶心(55%)、呕吐(59%)和腹痛(43%)在2小时内和24小时内分别得到改善(67%、73%和67%)。18人(46%)报告说,舒马曲坦帮助他们避免了急诊科就诊,20人(51%)避免了住院。舒马曲坦无反应与抑郁症(p=0.01)、当前大麻使用情况(p=0.02)、苯二氮卓类药物使用情况(p=0.04)和阿片类药物(0.02)有关。未发现严重副作用。结论:舒马曲坦的使用减轻了CVS的症状,但没有使其中止。需要进行前瞻性研究以确定其独立影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sumatriptan as abortive treatment in cyclic vomiting syndrome: A cross-sectional study
Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is characterized by episodic vomiting and shares similarities with migraine headache. Guidelines recommend using triptans as abortive therapy in CVS, but there are limited data on its efficacy. Methods: We thus sought to characterize sumatriptan use and performed a cross-sectional study of adults with CVS episodes within the previous 6 months. Questionnaires about demographics, clinical characteristics, and response to sumatriptan (defined as >50% reduction in symptoms) were administered via e-mail. We investigated differences between responders and nonresponders, using χ 2 and Student’s t test. Results: Of 101 participants (age 41 ± 15 years, 74% female, 83% Caucasian), 39 (38%) used sumatriptan during their last CVS attack. Most reported an improvement in nausea (55%), vomiting (59%), and abdominal pain (43%) within 2 h and at 24 h (67%, 73%, and 67%) respectively. Eighteen (46%) reported that sumatriptan helped them avoid emergency department visits and 20 (51%) avoided being hospitalized. Nonresponse to sumatriptan was associated with depression (p = 0.01), current cannabis use (p = 0.02), use of benzodiazepines (p = 0.04), and opioids (0.02) during an episode. No serious side effects were noted. Conclusions: Sumatriptan use reduced symptoms of CVS but did not abort them. Prospective studies to determine its independent effects are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia Reports
Cephalalgia Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信