我们是X吗,应该/应该X吗,让我们X

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Robin Sokol
{"title":"我们是X吗,应该/应该X吗,让我们X","authors":"Robin Sokol","doi":"10.1075/is.17013.sok","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article studies the formats Do we X, Should/Shall we X, and Let’s X in\n order to deepen our understanding of face-to-face collaborative interactions at the computer. We use 6 hours of data of university\n students collaborating in British and American English, and our methodology is Conversation Analysis. We demonstrate that the\n participants display and orient to the immediacy/remoteness of the task, as well as their entitlement to carry out the proposed\n task, when they put forward a proposed action. To do so, they use specific formats, specific verbs, and display specific tasks\n depending on their needs, emerging from the unfolding of the collaboration. We argue that collaboration is not only a matter of\n organising the accomplishment of a set of tasks, but also of displaying what kind of task is being proposed, and to what extent\n the speaker is entitled to the proposed task.","PeriodicalId":46494,"journal":{"name":"Interaction Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we X, Should/Shall we X, Let’s X\",\"authors\":\"Robin Sokol\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/is.17013.sok\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article studies the formats Do we X, Should/Shall we X, and Let’s X in\\n order to deepen our understanding of face-to-face collaborative interactions at the computer. We use 6 hours of data of university\\n students collaborating in British and American English, and our methodology is Conversation Analysis. We demonstrate that the\\n participants display and orient to the immediacy/remoteness of the task, as well as their entitlement to carry out the proposed\\n task, when they put forward a proposed action. To do so, they use specific formats, specific verbs, and display specific tasks\\n depending on their needs, emerging from the unfolding of the collaboration. We argue that collaboration is not only a matter of\\n organising the accomplishment of a set of tasks, but also of displaying what kind of task is being proposed, and to what extent\\n the speaker is entitled to the proposed task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interaction Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interaction Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17013.sok\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interaction Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17013.sok","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了Do we X、Should/Show we X和Let’s X的格式,以加深我们对计算机上面对面协作交互的理解。我们使用了6个小时的大学生英美英语合作数据,我们的方法是会话分析。我们证明,当参与者提出拟议的行动时,他们表现出并倾向于任务的即时性/远程性,以及他们执行拟议任务的权利。为了做到这一点,他们使用特定的格式、特定的动词,并根据自己的需求显示特定的任务,这是在合作的展开中产生的。我们认为,协作不仅是组织完成一组任务的问题,而且是展示提出的任务类型,以及演讲者有权在多大程度上获得提出的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do we X, Should/Shall we X, Let’s X
This article studies the formats Do we X, Should/Shall we X, and Let’s X in order to deepen our understanding of face-to-face collaborative interactions at the computer. We use 6 hours of data of university students collaborating in British and American English, and our methodology is Conversation Analysis. We demonstrate that the participants display and orient to the immediacy/remoteness of the task, as well as their entitlement to carry out the proposed task, when they put forward a proposed action. To do so, they use specific formats, specific verbs, and display specific tasks depending on their needs, emerging from the unfolding of the collaboration. We argue that collaboration is not only a matter of organising the accomplishment of a set of tasks, but also of displaying what kind of task is being proposed, and to what extent the speaker is entitled to the proposed task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: This international peer-reviewed journal aims to advance knowledge in the growing and strongly interdisciplinary area of Interaction Studies in biological and artificial systems. Understanding social behaviour and communication in biological and artificial systems requires knowledge of evolutionary, developmental and neurobiological aspects of social behaviour and communication; the embodied nature of interactions; origins and characteristics of social and narrative intelligence; perception, action and communication in the context of dynamic and social environments; social learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信