{"title":"对现代主义与现代性的再思考:一种舞蹈方法","authors":"Huafei Chen","doi":"10.1080/01472526.2021.1927433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ramsay Burt and Michael Huxley’s Dance, Modernism, and Modernity offers an important contribution to our understanding of the nexus of dance, modernism, and modernity. The term “modernity,” cited from sociologist Anthony Giddens, is defined as “a certain set of attitudes towards the world, the idea of the world as open to transformation, by human intervention” (p. 26). This openness to change and transformation, according to Burt and Huxley, is exemplified by the potential of dance to bring about “the diversity, fluidity, and contradictions of modernism” (p. 30). However, in this book, “modernism” no longer connotes “male, heteronormative, resolutely literary, Anglophone” (p. 16), but is characterized by the “expansion” proposed by Douglas Mao and Rebecca Walkowitz in their 2008 article “The New Modernist Studies.” Such an expansion, “in terms of discipline, geography, definition and identity” (p. 18), takes place along three axes—temporal, spatial, and vertical—through which the authors conduct a multiple-angled analysis of how dance has developed and responded to the experience of living in modern times. Thus Burt and Huxley’s critical approach is to eschew early writings on modernism in dance that are concerned solely with formal and aesthetic issues—such as Marshall Cohen’s questioning of Susanne K. Langer’s claim that dance creates the illusion of the conquest of gravity as an embodiment of modernism—and attempt to develop a wider and more inclusive interpretation of modernism. After the lengthy and thorough foreword by Claire Warden, this collection of eleven essays—four by Burt, three by Huxley, and four by them both—is thoughtfully organized into two parts. Part 1, co-written by Burt and Huxley, is concerned with key factors and issues about modernism and modernity in dance during the period, with chapter 1 serving as the introduction. Chapter 2 centers on a historiographical (temporal axis) consideration of modern dance from the early 1900s to the mid-1950s. The authors","PeriodicalId":42141,"journal":{"name":"DANCE CHRONICLE","volume":"44 1","pages":"182 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01472526.2021.1927433","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Modernism and Modernity: A Dance Approach\",\"authors\":\"Huafei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01472526.2021.1927433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ramsay Burt and Michael Huxley’s Dance, Modernism, and Modernity offers an important contribution to our understanding of the nexus of dance, modernism, and modernity. The term “modernity,” cited from sociologist Anthony Giddens, is defined as “a certain set of attitudes towards the world, the idea of the world as open to transformation, by human intervention” (p. 26). This openness to change and transformation, according to Burt and Huxley, is exemplified by the potential of dance to bring about “the diversity, fluidity, and contradictions of modernism” (p. 30). However, in this book, “modernism” no longer connotes “male, heteronormative, resolutely literary, Anglophone” (p. 16), but is characterized by the “expansion” proposed by Douglas Mao and Rebecca Walkowitz in their 2008 article “The New Modernist Studies.” Such an expansion, “in terms of discipline, geography, definition and identity” (p. 18), takes place along three axes—temporal, spatial, and vertical—through which the authors conduct a multiple-angled analysis of how dance has developed and responded to the experience of living in modern times. Thus Burt and Huxley’s critical approach is to eschew early writings on modernism in dance that are concerned solely with formal and aesthetic issues—such as Marshall Cohen’s questioning of Susanne K. Langer’s claim that dance creates the illusion of the conquest of gravity as an embodiment of modernism—and attempt to develop a wider and more inclusive interpretation of modernism. After the lengthy and thorough foreword by Claire Warden, this collection of eleven essays—four by Burt, three by Huxley, and four by them both—is thoughtfully organized into two parts. Part 1, co-written by Burt and Huxley, is concerned with key factors and issues about modernism and modernity in dance during the period, with chapter 1 serving as the introduction. Chapter 2 centers on a historiographical (temporal axis) consideration of modern dance from the early 1900s to the mid-1950s. The authors\",\"PeriodicalId\":42141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DANCE CHRONICLE\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01472526.2021.1927433\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DANCE CHRONICLE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01472526.2021.1927433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"DANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DANCE CHRONICLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01472526.2021.1927433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"DANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rethinking Modernism and Modernity: A Dance Approach
Ramsay Burt and Michael Huxley’s Dance, Modernism, and Modernity offers an important contribution to our understanding of the nexus of dance, modernism, and modernity. The term “modernity,” cited from sociologist Anthony Giddens, is defined as “a certain set of attitudes towards the world, the idea of the world as open to transformation, by human intervention” (p. 26). This openness to change and transformation, according to Burt and Huxley, is exemplified by the potential of dance to bring about “the diversity, fluidity, and contradictions of modernism” (p. 30). However, in this book, “modernism” no longer connotes “male, heteronormative, resolutely literary, Anglophone” (p. 16), but is characterized by the “expansion” proposed by Douglas Mao and Rebecca Walkowitz in their 2008 article “The New Modernist Studies.” Such an expansion, “in terms of discipline, geography, definition and identity” (p. 18), takes place along three axes—temporal, spatial, and vertical—through which the authors conduct a multiple-angled analysis of how dance has developed and responded to the experience of living in modern times. Thus Burt and Huxley’s critical approach is to eschew early writings on modernism in dance that are concerned solely with formal and aesthetic issues—such as Marshall Cohen’s questioning of Susanne K. Langer’s claim that dance creates the illusion of the conquest of gravity as an embodiment of modernism—and attempt to develop a wider and more inclusive interpretation of modernism. After the lengthy and thorough foreword by Claire Warden, this collection of eleven essays—four by Burt, three by Huxley, and four by them both—is thoughtfully organized into two parts. Part 1, co-written by Burt and Huxley, is concerned with key factors and issues about modernism and modernity in dance during the period, with chapter 1 serving as the introduction. Chapter 2 centers on a historiographical (temporal axis) consideration of modern dance from the early 1900s to the mid-1950s. The authors
期刊介绍:
For dance scholars, professors, practitioners, and aficionados, Dance Chronicle is indispensable for keeping up with the rapidly changing field of dance studies. Dance Chronicle publishes research on a wide variety of Western and non-Western forms, including classical, avant-garde, and popular genres, often in connection with the related arts: music, literature, visual arts, theatre, and film. Our purview encompasses research rooted in humanities-based paradigms: historical, theoretical, aesthetic, ethnographic, and multi-modal inquiries into dance as art and/or cultural practice. Offering the best from both established and emerging dance scholars, Dance Chronicle is an ideal resource for those who love dance, past and present. Recently, Dance Chronicle has featured special issues on visual arts and dance, literature and dance, music and dance, dance criticism, preserving dance as a living legacy, dancing identity in diaspora, choreographers at the cutting edge, Martha Graham, women choreographers in ballet, and ballet in a global world.